22s Ss Sf 3 wine iy ®t 7 ’ ig Ce ES A, me ae “ a an i” Beco: LIBERTE, pe nis red Moi’ The Bulletin of the DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY-SCHOOL PRINCIPALS National Education Association VOLU ME 22 DEVELOPING A FACULTY COMMITTEE ON PUPIL ADJUSTMENT K. J. CLARK Principal, Murphy High School, Mobile, Alabama The purpose of this article is to explain the development of “A Faculty Committee on Student Adjustments” as clearly and completely as possible. The philosophy behind the idea, the arrangement of the plan, the changes that have been made in these as the committee has worked upon them during the past two years, and the nature of the problems that have been handled by the Committee will be considered. Not long ago, the writer was visiting one of the largest high schools in the South. While I was there, the principal of that school was asked how he dealt with his problem cases and what he considered the greatest weakness of his method. To this he replied that he had found nothing which took the place of the personal conference, and that he recognized that he often failed to get the desired results with problem cases be- cause of the lack of sufficient time to deal properly with the individual, or the need of an organization which would pro- vide persons who could give such problems the necessary con- sideration. For some time after that discussion, the writer’s atten- tion was centered on this problem—one that every high-school principal must face: What shall be done with and for the prob- lem cases? Often teachers complain that too much time and attention are given to the least promising pupils. Every prin- cipal knows that these problems will demand more than their share of time and attention. The best method of dealing with these cases, however, is that which gets the most advantageous results with the individuals concerned and which the most pro- gressively decreases the time each of them demands. About two years ago the writer was asked to lead a dis- cussion on the problem of guidance at a state conference of [April, 2 DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY-SCHOOL PRINCIPALS high-school principals. In preparation for this discussion, some of the teachers of our local high school were requested to write an answer to this question: “What should a pupil en- tering high school expect from the administration in the way of guidance?” In response to this question, one teacher gave the following written reply. (1) A student should expect the school to do him no harm, in any way. This throws a great responsibility on the administration. Much of our education has been, and still is, not education, but malpractice. Re- quired gymnastics may injure some bodies; courses pitched too high or too low in requirements may smother or warp a capacity; social contacts permitted may invite bad habits or vice; clashes of personalities in the classroom may breed sullenness or a sense of injustice; the organizations setup in a large school may so bewilder a student as to cheat him out of their benefits. All of these factors of school life, if not worked out to the benefit of the student, will positively result in harming him. If an elaborate, expensive provision is not possible, a simple, carefully thought- out plan will work and is an obligation on the part of the administration. There follows then that... (2) A student should expect his physical make-up to be understood. This is a tremendous challenge in itself, opening vistas of service without end. If any records have been kept for individual students in the elementary schools, they should be filed with the high school when the student enters as a freshman. If not, some records should be begun by the high school. If the aid of regular school physicians is financially impossible, records should be undertaken on a simpler scale by the faculty setup appointed by the office. The study of these record cards should be an obligation on class-room teachers especially if they are referred to them. A child’s physical requirements should take precedence over all official routine. Some guidance setup should centralize a watchfulness with authority. (3) A student should expect a school to understand his capacities better than he understands them himself. His I. Q. should be on record and should be used in mapping his course. Too difficult courses and too easy courses are equally harmful; yet there should be enough latitude and scope on a horizontal plane to allow considerable freedom of choice along vocational lines possible to that level of ability. A forward look to a choice of vocation has its place here, involving endless detail. (4) A student cannot have a bird’s-eye-view of all the detailed offerings of a school. Even a classroom teacher has no such concept. A student has the right to expect to be aided expertly as to the best choices for himself. That is, every student’s program should be an individual study made by a centralized authority which is well versed in the offer- ings of the school and the community, in the outlook of the child’s home, in his health, in his I.Q., and in his disposition. The student should even expect to be relieved of the confusion, embarrassment, and the loneliness of a crowd of personalities and of mechanical details. (5)