RESEARCH BULLETIN Ore NATIONAL VOL. XV - No. 4 EDUCATION SEPTEMBER 1937 ASSOCIATION Federal Support for Education The Issues and the Facts Published by the RESEARCH DIVISION of the NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION 1201 Sixteenth Street, N. W., Washington, D. C. RESEARCH BULLETIN oF wn Published five times each year in January, March, May, September, and November President, CAROLINE S. WOODRUFF NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION Executive Secretary, WILLARD E. GIVENS Director of Research: William G. Carr; Associate Director: Frank W. Hubbard Assistant Directors: Richard R. Foster, lvan A. Booker, Hazel Davis Research Assistants and Section Heads: Frances G. Bradley, Louise B. Sease, Helen H. Cox, Anna Haddow, Madaline K. Remmlein, Ruth Shirley, Mildred Wharton, and Vera D. Vinogradoff Executive and Editorial Offices 1201 Sixteenth Street, N. W., Washington, D. C. Copyright, 1937, by the National Education Association Entered as second-class matter February 10, 1923, at the Post Office at Washington, D. C., under Act of August 24, 1912. Acceptance for mailing at special rate of postage provided for in Section 1103, Act of October 3, 1917, authorized February 10, 1923. Subscriptions The payment of the $5 membership fee of the National Education Association entitles one to receive for one year the Research Bulletin, the Journal, the An- nual Volume of Addresses and Proceed- ings, and certain other publications of the Association. One dollar of each $5 mem- bership fee is for a year’s subscription to the Research Bulletin. The Research Bulletin may be received regularly thru a special subscription at $1 per year. Many of the early issues of the Research Bulletin are already out of print. The special subscription at $1 per year offers an opportunity to maintain a complete file of future Research Bulletins. Those entitled to receive the Research Bulletin regularly are asked to report at once any change of residence, giving old as well as new address. Purchasing Copies Additional copies of this issue of the Research Bulletin may be obtained at the following prices, postpaid if remittance accompanies order: Single copies, 25¢. 2 to 9 copies—10% reduction. 10 to 99 copies—25% reduction. 100 or more copies—33%4 % reduction. Orders for Research Bulletins not ac- companied by remittance are subject to transportation charges. Make checks pay- able to National Education Association. Reproduction of Material in Research Bulletins Material appearing in the Research Bulletin is copyrighted. However, De- partments and regularly affiliated organi- zations of the National Education Asso- ciation may reproduce parts of these bulletins for the advancement of education. These departments and organizations need no authority other than this notice previous to such reproduction. In other cases appli- cation for the release of materials is re- quired. Address communications to the Research Division, National Education As- sociation, 1201 Sixteenth Street, N. W., Washington, D. C. CONTENTS FoREWORD INTRODUCTION INEQUALITIES OF EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY Economic ABILITY OF THE STATES To SupporT SCHOOLS THE SIZE OF THE EDUCATIONAL TASK THE DEcLINING BirTH-RATE MIGRATION FROM FARMS GROWTH IN CorPORATE OWNERSHIP OF WEALTH Errorts Requirep To Support AN ADEQUATE SCHOOL PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT OF STATE TAX SYSTEMS ScHOOL CosTs AND OTHER EXPENDITURES THE INCIDENCE OF FEDERAL TAXATION Mopsitity oF PoPULATION FURTHER QUESTIONS ON FEDERAL AID VIII. em . Percent of State Tax Revenues from Sources Other Than Property Taxes, 1930 XI. XII. XIII. XIV. LIST OF FIGURES . Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Schools, Per Pupil Enrolled, 1933-34 . Relative Per Capita Taxpaying Ability of the States, 1930 . Number of Children Aged 5 to 13 for Each 1000 Adults 20 to 64, by Regions, 1930 . Percent of Nation’s Children and Percent of Nation’s Income in Each of Six Geographic Regions, 1930 . Net Change in Rates of Natural Increase in Population, by Regions, 1929-36 . Net Migration of Farm Population by Regions, 1920-1930 . Movement of Wealth Away from Farms, 1920-1930 Comparative Trends in Corporate and National Wealth Effort, Based on Chism’s Data, Required To Support National Minimum Program, 1932 Index of Educational Expenditures and Other Governmental Expenditures, 1926-34 Percent of Federal Tax Collections from Twelve States, 1935 Growth in Number of Stockholders in Three Large Corporations Gain and Loss thru Interstate Migration, 1920-1930 [155] 1S2 Page 160 162 164 164 166 168 178 180 FOREWORD it there is not the remotest possibility of providing an equitable minimum standard of educational opportunity thruout the nation. This conclusion is based upon the following indisputable facts: Fite: PARTICIPATION in the support of education is inevitable. Without (1) There are the most appalling differences in educational opportunity, both among the states and within the states. (2) These differences in educational opportunity are the result of economic con- ditions largely beyond the control of the states. (3) Regardless of the effort made, many states will never be able to provide, from their own resources, a minimum acceptable program of educational opportunity. (4) The recent development of corporations and holding companies, and changes in the forms of wealth, have made it impossible for the states to tax the greatest potential sources of revenue. The federal government has an inescapable interest in the maintenance of public education, and it must bear with the states the financial burden ot supporting school facilities thruout the nation. Considerations leading to this conclusion are as follows: (1) Citizens of the state are none the less citizens of the nation, and, as has been pronounced by every American statesman, schools and the means of public education are indispensable to a democratic nation. (2) The mobility of our population and the higher birth-rates among the poor states compel the interest of each of the states, and hence of the nation, in the character of educational opportunity offered everywhere in the nation. During the past two or three years there has been considerable legislation designed to reform various economic and social conditions. For example, Con- gress voted twenty million dollars to enable tenant farmers of the South to become farm owners. Desirable as reform legislation may be, there is often an underlying problem of education. This fact is recognized in a Works Prog- ress Administration publication entitled Landlord and Tenant on the Cotton Plantation: The new order in agriculture, necessary to rehabilitate the South, gives rise to entirely different problems, and these modern agricultural problems cannot be successfully met with ignorance. Yet the schools, the chief agencies by which ignorance may be dispelled, are allowed to languish for want of interest and adequate financial support. The ignorance and shortsightedness of the cotton share-cropper of this generation is but a reflection of his training in the past. In like manner succeeding generations of adults will be handicapped by the inadequacies of their childhood training unless a new order of rural education can be effected. In this bulletin the Research Division brings before the profession the gist of the argument presented at recent Senate and House hearings on the Harrison- Black-Fletcher Bill. The cause of federal aid goes forward. Let teachers in their local and state groups review the evidence and prepare themselves for the next advance. Witarp E. Givens, Executive Secretary, National Education Association. [156] Introduction Prior to the last two decades the public schools with but few exceptions were supported thru the resources of local communities. Under pressure of sweeping social and economic forces state participation eventually became necessary. These same forces have made it just as essential for the federal government to contribute to the support of education as it has been for the states to do so. What are the facts to support this point of view? The purpose of the present bul- letin is to review the evidence in the case for federal aid to education. Is Federal Aid a New Idea? Between 1781 and 1802 the thirteen original states ceded to the federal government their claims to the land between the Alleghanies and the Mississippi River. In 1783 Colonel Timothy Pickering, in a proposal for settling soldiers of the Revolution in a part of the present state of Ohio, suggested that surplus western lands should be disposed for the com- mon good including the establishing of schools and academies. The Ordinance of 1785, order- ing the rectangle system of survey of public lands, provided that “lot No. 16 of every town- ship” should be reserved for the maintenance of public schools. The Ordinance of 1787 stated that “schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged” in the states to be de- veloped from the western territory. In the same year the Ohio Company purchased land on the Ohio River with the understanding that Sec- tion 16 should be reserved for schools. Similar terms were made in the sale of Ohio land to John C. Symmes in 1788. In these laws and grants of Congress we have the beginnings of a national land-grant policy for the promotion of education. The earlier policy was definitely established and extended in the admission of states carved from the western lands.' In the admission of Ohio in 1802 the sixteenth section of land in each township was granted for schools, on the condition that the state should exempt from taxation for five years all public lands sold by Congress. Similar bargains were made in the admission of Tennessee, Indiana, Mississippi, Illinois, and Alabama. With the exception of Maine, Texas, and West Virginia, all states 1 Cubberley, Ellwood P. State School Administration. Boston: admitted after the establishment of this land policy received grants for schools. Most of the states west of the Mississippi River received two and sometimes four sections in every town- ship. In most of the states, also, similar grants were made for college and university purposes. By the Morrill Act of 1862 additional grants for colleges of agricultural and mechanical arts were made not only to the western states in the form of land, but to the southern and east- ern states in the form of land scrip. ‘l'aken to- gether, the federal land specifically granted for common schools constituted an area larger than Italy, over twice as large as England and Wales, and twenty-five times the size of Con- necticut.” After the Civil War there were several pro- posals that federal aid to the states for educa- tion should take the form of money grants. The Hoar Bill of 1870 provided that proceeds from the sale of public lands should be distributed in proportion to illiteracy in each state. This bill was never enacted into law. The three Blair bills (between 1884 and 1887), also providing for the distribution of funds to the states on the basis of illiteracy, passed the Senate but were never approved by the House. In 1887, by the passing of the Hatch Act, Congress appropriated $15,000 a year to each of the land-grant colleges for agricultural ex- perimental stations. Later the basic amount was increased and provision was made for an- nual increases. By the so-called “Second Mor- rill Act” of 1890 Congress granted additional money to the land-grant colleges. Beginning at $15,000 per year for each college, the law has been amended to provide for grants up to a maximum of $50,000 per year. The Hatch Act and the Second Morrill Act together make it possible for each state to receive $140,000 each year in direct aid for higher education. Since 1911 the general policy of federal aid, other than that of recent emergency grants, has followed the pattern set by the Weeks Act for fire protection. The significant features of this act were: (1) state matching of federal funds; (2) details of administration in state hands; and (3) federal supervision and inspec- tion of the operation of the plan. In 1914 the Smith-Lever Act provided na- Houghton Mifflin Co., 1927. p. 15-76 2See Table V in F. H. Swift’s Federal and State Policies in Public School Finance in the United States. Boston: Ginn and Co., 1931. p. 26. { 157] tional aid to the states for the diffusion of in- formation on subjects relating to agriculture and home economics. In 1924-25 the total fed- eral grants under this act amounted to nearly six million dollars. The Smith-Hughes Act of 1917 provided federal aid for vocational edu- cation. The states must appropriate a sum equal to the federal grant. In August 1937 a sup- plementary law was enacted, providing $14,- 000,000 of federal funds to meet the provisions of this bill and subsequent legislation. In addition to the foregoing provisions for federal aid to education, there have been other less well-known grants of assistance. These in- clude gifts of saline and swamp lands, grants from the sale of public lands, the distribution of “surplus revenue” from the federal treasury, the gifts of public lands for internal improve- ments, and various enabling acts upon the ad- mission of territories to statehood. Since the World War, there have been large federal ap- propriations for the vocational reeducation both of veterans and of persons disabled in industry. Federal assistance in the form of money grants has been given during the recent depression years to help “closed” schools, to provide nursery and adult education, to construct school buildings, and to carry out the programs of the Civilian Conservation Corps and the Na- tional Youth Administration. The National Education Association and Proposals for Federal Aid As early as 1869 the National Teachers’ Association, a forerunner of the present Na- tional Education Association, became interested in the establishment of a national university. A bill was introduced in 1873, providing that the federal government should pay the pro- posed university 5 percent on an endowment of $20,000,000. Congress took no action on this measure or on similar proposals which have been introduced from time to time. The idea, however, is discussed from year to year by members of the Association who believe that the proposition has considerable merit. A committee of the Association proposed in 1919 that there be established a Department of Education with a Secretary in the Presi- dent’s Cabinet and that $100,000,000 a year be granted to the states for the improvement of schools. In essentially the same form (Smith- Towner, 1919; Sterling-Towner, 1921; Ster- ling-Reed, 1923) the bill was reintroduced into [158] Congress. Without the provision for feders| aid, a similar bill was unsuccessfully advocate, in 1925. In 1936, thru its Legislative Commission, the National Education Association had troduced into Congress the Harrison-Blac! Fletcher Bill. The main provisions of the p; posal were: Appropriations to the states—Funds are a; priated to the states to be used by them for sci The manner in which the funds received sha}! used for the maintenance of a program of p education is left wholly to the respective state levi. latures. Basis of apportionment—The funds are a tioned to the states and territories according ¢ number of persons 5 to 20 years old in each ($25 per person the first year and increasing to $7.63 ; fifth year). Each state can then apportion the funds to its districts according to any plan it may choos Federal control prohibited—All control, adm tration, and supervision of schools and educatio: programs are reserved strictly to the states and { bidden to all federal officers and agencies. What the states must do—In order to qualify { receiving the federal allotments each state or t tory must do three things: (a) maintain a syste: public schools available thruout the state or territ wherein each school in said system shall be hy session for a term of not less than 160 days, closing of schools due to epidemics, fires, and acts of God being excepted; (b) spend from combined state and local revenues for elementary and secondary sch as much per person 5 to 20 years old as was spent in the school year ending 1936, taking into conside: tion the total population and each population g: for which schools are specifically maintained; and (c) have legislative enactments for the distributior expenditure, and administration of the fund a; priated by the federal government, and for a and equitable distribution and expenditure of said funds among the several public schools of that state or territory. Amount of funds to be required—An initia propriation of $100,000,000 and an increase of $5 000,000 each year until $300,000,000 per ye provided. Publ; ernm: State. Ist S In the spring of 1937 hearings were held be fore the Senate Committee on Labor and Edu cation and the Committee on Education of the House of Representatives. The Senate Com mittee voted favorably on the bill, but an “economy wave” prevented its further con sideration by the Senate. The House Commit tee postponed action, pending action by ¢! Senate. Meanwhile educators await with terest the report on the role of the federal government in education which is now being prepared by the President’s Advisory Commit tee on Education. e deral Cated ssion, d in slack- > pro- appro- chools all be public legis- appor to the ($2 $4 .63 the funds thoose lminis- ational id for ify for . terri- ‘tem of rritory held in closing »f God ite and schools S$ spent sidera- ) group d; and bution, appro- a just of said of that ‘ial ap- of $50,- year is eld be- | Edu- of the Com- yut an r con- ommit- by the ith in- federal r being ommit- How the Bulletin Is Organized The published reports * of the congressional hearings on the Harrison-Black-Fletcher Bill cover over one thousand pages of statistical evidence and expert opinion. It is doubtful whether any educational proposal considered by Congress has had a more carefully con- sidered and detailed body of supporting evi- dence. One of the principal purposes of the present bulletin is to make this collection of information available in concise and systematic form. In presenting the case for federal aid to the congressional committees, the Association drew upon the studies of the Research Division, the investigations of educational and tax authori- ties, and the experience of experts in numerous fields. In a brief presentation of the data this bulletin will discuss the following major ques- tions: (1) What inequalities among the states make federal aid a necessity? Three topics will be treated in this connection: (a) the inequalities of educational opportunity, (b) the economic ability of the states to support schools, and (c) the size of the educational task. (2) Do present conditions tend to perpetuate the inequalities among the states? Evidence will be presented on three topics: (a) the de- clining birth-rate, (b) migration from farms, and (c) growth in corporate ownership of wealth. (3) Could the states themselves overcome the existing inequalities? The points two treated in answer to this question are: (a) ettorts required to support an adequate school program, and (b) improvement ot state tax systems. (4+) Can the nation afford to support educa- tion? Particular attention is given here to the topics: (a) school costs and other expenditures, and (b) the incidence of federal taxation. (5) Why is the education of children in all of the states of national concern? This question is answered by evidence on the mobility of population. (6) What other questions artse with regard to federal aid for education? Passing reference is made to several problems discussed at the congressional hearings which do not lend them- selves readily to statistical treatment. How This Bulletin May Be Used The history of federal legislation indicates an increasing sentiment for a recognition by the federal government of its obligations to education. At some future time appropriate legislation will be passed—either the Harrison- Black-Fletcher Bill or some other. Desirable action will be hastened if teachers themselves are aware of the issues and the facts involved. The evidence needs to be thoroly studied by individual teachers and by groups in local and state associations. Laymen need to be informed by discussions in parent-teacher associations and in the many civic organizations. The present bulletin should prove to be a valuable hand- book in all such activities. 5U. S. Congress. Senate, Committee on Education and Labor. Assistance to States and Territories in Providing Programs of Public Education. Hearings on S. 419, February 9, 10, 11, and 15, 1937. 75th Congress, Ist Session. Washington, D. C.: Gov- ernment Printing Office, 1937. 307 p. 1 U. S. Congress. House of Representatives, Committee on Education. Federal Aid to the States for the Support of Public Schools. Hearings on H. R. 5962, March 30 and 31, April 1, 2, 6, 8, and 13, 1937. 75th Congress, Ist Session. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1937. 485 p. O MORE FUNDAMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY rests upon Congress than that of devising N appropriate measures of financial aid to education, supplemental to local action in the states and territories and in the District of Columbia. The wise forethought of the founders of our government has not only furnished the basis for the support of the common-school systems of the newer states, but laid the foundations for the maintenance of their universities and colleges of agricultural and mechanic arts. Measures in accord- ance with this traditional policy for the further benefit of all these interests and the extension of the same advantages to every portion of the country, it is hoped will receive your favorable consideration.” —Message to Congress, 1879, Rutherford B. Hayes. [159] FIGURE I EXPENDITURES FOR PUBLIC ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS, PER PUPIL ENROLLED, 1933-34 $80 $120 °o had 3 “ 48 3 Jo 4 New York Nevada California New Jersey Delaware Massachusetts Rhode Island Wyoming Connecticut Minois Ohio New Hampshire Montana Maryland Pennsylvania Arizona Colorado Wisconsin Minnesota Michigan Oregon Kansas Washington lowa Hi Indiana New Mexico South Dakota North Dakota Utah Idaho Missouri Vermont Nebraska Maine West Virginia Texas Oklahoma Florida Virginia — Louisiana United States Tennessee Kentucky Alabama North Carolina Georgia South Carolina Arkansas Mississippi $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 a“ Research Divisic.n, National Education Associa | Based on the “Biennial Survey of Education, 1932-34."" Federal Office of Education [ 160 } tion Inequalities of Educational Opportunity There are wide differences in the extent and quality of the school programs offered by the various states.’ The full significance of these differences can never be shown statistically, yet their presence is clearly reflected in certain types of data. Some of the more striking disparities revealed by figures on per pupil expenditures, length of school term, ratio of high-school en- rolment to total enrolment, salaries paid teach- ers, and the per pupil value of school property are cited in the following paragraphs. Figure I, on the opposite page, makes use of only the first of these measures—expenditures per pupil enrolled—to demonstrate the com- parative inadequacy of the educational oppor- tunities afforded the children of some of our states. The year 1933-34 is the latest for which reliable and complete information is available. Inequalities in Pupil Expenditures Contrast the kind of schools that can be bought for $18.93 per pupil, annually, with those which cost an annual sum of $124.32 per pupil. Yet Figure I shows that these were the average amounts spent in 1933-34 for each pupil enrolled in the public schools of Missis- sippi and New York, respectively. According to these figures the average school child of New York state has about 6% times as much money spent on his education, each year, as the average school child of Mississippi. Figure I ranks all of the states in the order of their annual expenditures per pupil enrolled in the public schools, in 1933-34. In the United States as a whole, this expenditure was $64.76 —more than three times as great as that of Mississippi. Seven states spent more than $80 per pupil enrolled, but eight states spent less than $30, and eleven states less than $40 per pupil enrolled. Other Disparities The average school term in the nation as a whole is about 8'%4 months. The average terms supported by the states range from 914 months to less than 6% months. In seven states the average number of days attended by rural pupils is less than 6 months. More than 600,- 000 children attend rural schools which are in session for less than 6 months per year. Are these rural children expected to learn as much 1 Based upon Senate Hearings on S. 419, p. 29-32; House Hearings on H. R. 5962, pp. 34-37 in 6 months as children in some other states, and in city schools of the same states, can learn in 8 or 9 months? Can a teacher be employed for $465 annually who will be equal in training and ability to one who is paid an annual salary of $2361? The former figure is the average, not the minimum, salary paid public school teachers in Arkansas in 1933-34. The latter figure is the average salary paid teachers in New York state. Four states pay teachers an average of less than $600 a year; nine states pay less than $750. The ratio of high-school enrolments to total enrolments varies, among the states, from 30.9 percent in Wisconsin to only 10.6 percent in Mississippi. Eleven states have more than 25 percent of their total enrolment in high schools while in eleven other states high-school enrol- ments represent less than 16 percent of the total enrolment. With our present population, if high schools were universally available and universally attended, high-school enrolments would constitute approximately 331% percent of total enrolments. The range among the states in the value of public school property per pupil in attend- ance is from $570 in Massachusetts to $60 in Mississippi. Over 65 percent of all school build- ings in the latter state are one-room schools. In the former state, one-room schools represent less than 15 percent of total school buildings. A study by PWA engineers reveals that about two and one-half million children are not provided with public school facilities. Nearly as many pupils attend school only part- time or in buildings that are unsanitary and unsafe. Differences among the states in breadth of educational opportunity are as great as the more material differences reflected in the sta- tistical data cited above. Differences Not Due to Lack of Interest in Education The differences in educational opportunity cited above are not the result of reluctance upon the part of some states to support schools. They are, in almost every case, due to economic conditions over which the states -affected have no control. ‘These conditions are discussed in the following pages. and U. S. Office of Education, Biennial Survey of Education, 1932-1934, Chapter II, ‘Statistics of State School Systems, 1933-34 [161 ] FIGURE II RELATIVE PER CAPITA TAXPAYING ABILITY OF THE STATES, 1930 $64 $96 $128 $160 $400 at — j Delaware oe Nevada New York New Jersey Connecticut California Wyoming Massachusetts Mlinois Rhode Island lows Montana Oregon Michigan Washington Nebraske Ohio Pennsylvania ro “ re UN Arizona Colorado Kansas Maryland Minnesota Wisconsin Idaho South Dakota Missouri Utah New Hampshire m Indiana . West Virginia North Dakota Floride Vermont Mt) Oklahoma Texas Sead Stotes k New Mexico al Virginia ; Tennessee North Carolina Kentucky Louisiana Arkansas T] Georgia C, Alabama , South Carolina ( Mississippi l | | l 1 — M $64 $96 $128 $160 $400 o tad w LJ) Research Division, National Education Associat Based on data from Mabel Newcomer's "An Index of the Taxpaying Ability of State and Local Governments.” { 162] Economic Ability of the States To Support Schools The states are unequal in their economic abil- ity to support schools." Differences among the states in financial ability to support schools have been measured in several ways. In an early investigation Norton measured ability in terms of income and wealth. The expenses of govern- ment, however, are paid out of taxes so that the state which can collect the most taxes is un- doubtedly the most able to support schools or any other public function. T'wo more recent investigations of tax resources have been made by Newcomer and Chism. Figure II, on the opposite page, is based on data from New- comer’s study. Differences in Taxpaying Ability Newcomer based her measures of taxpaying ability on the estimated yield, in each of the states, of a uniform system of taxation, recom- mended by a committee of the National Tax Association in 1933. The committee recom- mended that every tax system should include a personal income tax, a tax on tangible property, and a business income tax. In addition, New- comer included in her proposed uniform tax system three supplementary taxes—a severance tax, a corporate organization tax, and a stock transfer tax—on grounds that these taxes rep- resent extraordinary taxpaying ability in cer- tain states which should be reflected in any measure of the relative taxpaying ability of the forty-eight states. According to Newcomer, the estimated tax resources of New York state were $1 ,038,000,- 000 in 1930, 115 times as great as the $9,000,- 000 of estimated tax resources of New Mexico. Figure III is based on these data and compar- able data for the other states reduced to a per capita basis. Figure III shows that in 1930, Delaware had a per capita taxpaying ability of $390—39 times that of South Carolina and Mississippi. The average taxpaying ability in the United States as a whole was $40, which is just equal to the taxpaying ability of each resident of Michigan, Washington, Nebraska, and Ohio. Nevada, which ranks second to Delaware, had a per capita taxpaying ability of $141, and the figure for New York, which ranks third on this basis, is $79. Residents of eight states had an average taxpaying ability of less than $20 average taxpaying ability of less than $20. Using similar methods, Chism also found a wide divergence in the estimated tax resources of the various states. Differences in Ability as Measured by Income and Wealth The United States Department of Com- merce has estimated the national income, in the year 1934, at $50,174,000,000. A distribution of this total among the states, as estimated by the National Industrial Conference Board, in- dicates that $8,650,000,000, or about 17 per- cent of the total, was received by the inhabitants of New York state. The people of only seven states—New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Cal- ifornia, Ohio, Massachusetts, and New Jersey -received $27,053,821,000, or almost 54 per- cent of the national total. The total estimated wealth of the nation in 1932, according to the National Industrial Conference Board, was $247,300,000,000. The Conference Board’s estimate ot the distribution of national wealth among the states shows al- most one-third of the total wealth of the nation located in four states—New York, Pennsyl- vania, Illinois, and Ohio. All available data on the relative financial re- sources of the states tend to bear out the con- clusion that wide differences exist. According to the most conservative of the figures the abil- ity of the richest state to support education is at least six times as great as that of the poorest state. Other estimates indicate that this diver- gence is even greater. On any basis, so far presented, the taxpaying ability of states like Delaware, Nevada, New York, New Jersey, California, Connecticut, Wyoming, and Massachusetts averages from two to four times as great as that of the states of North Carolina, Kentucky, Louisiana, Ar- kansas, Georgia, Alabam&, South Carolina, and Mississippi. ‘hese differences are great enough to account for many of the variations in educa- tional opportunity cited on page 161, even if they were not aggravated by conditions dis- cussed in later sections of this bulletin. ‘ Based upon Senate Hearings on S. 419, p. 21-27, 242-45. 1 House Hearings on H. R. 5962, p. 32-34. 1 Newcomer, Mabel. An Index of the Taxpaying Ability of State and Local Governments. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1935. 85p. For further reference consult Norton, John K., and Norton, Margaret A. Wealth, Children and Education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1937. p. 1-48. Mort, Paul R., and others. Federal Support for Public Education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1936. p. 115-205. [ 163 ] FIGURE III NUMBER OF CHILDREN AGED 5 TO 13 FOR EACH 1000 ADULTS 20 TO 64, BY REGIONS, 1930 ? 190 a 390 400 a bs Southeast South west Northwest Midd le States Northeast Far West t T T T 7 0 100 200 300 400 500 Research Division, Nationa! Education Based on data from the Fifteenth Census of the United States, 1930. FIGURE IV PERCENT OF NATION'S CHILDREN AND PERCENT OF NATION'S INCOME IN EACH OF SIX GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS, 1930 PERCENT c 10 20 30 40 50 Northeast Middle States Southeast U Southwest P. t of child on SEMMEE 51517 core of ase GE Percent of national income Far West -_ ¥ ' T T 7 0 10 20 30 40 50 Research Division, National Education Based on population figures from U. S. Census, 1930, and data on the distribution of income for 1929 published by the Brookings Institution. ton The Size of the Educational Task Inequalities in the economic ability of the ites to support education are emphasized by differences in the size of the educational task.’ It is significant that almost invariably the states with the lowest taxpaying ability and the most meager educational programs are those with the highest number of children in propor- rion to adults. Figure III, on page 164, shows the number of children 5 to 13 years of age for each 1000 adults in the total population in six geographical regions. Figure IV presents data bearing on the relationship of financial ability to educational load by comparing the percent of the nation’s children with the percent of na- tional income received in each of these regions. Ratio of Children to Adults Figure III reveals striking regional differ- ences in the ratios of children to adults in the main productive age group. For every 1000 persons between the ages of 20 and 64, there are in the Southeast 426 children of elementary- school age (between the ages of 5 and 13). In the Southwest section of the country the ratio of children ages 5 to 13 years per 1000 adults is 380. There are 350 children per 1000 adults in the Northwest; 297 in the Middle States; 295 in the Northeast, and only 236 in the Pa- cific Coast States of the Far West. In other words, the productive population of the South- east is carrying a burden of child care and edu- cation which is 44 percent greater than that carried by the Northeast and 80 percent greater than that carried by the Far West. Differences in the distribution of school pop- ulation among the individual states are even greater than among the geographical regions. Only a few comparisons between states will be made at this point. ‘Che number of children, 5 to 13 years of age, for each 1000 adults between the ages of 20 and 64 is 523 in South Carolina as compared with 225 in California. Similar ratios are 491 in North Carolina and 441 in Alabama, as compared with 254 in New York state and 270 in Illinois. Usually the relation of the number of chil- dren to adults is in inverse ratio to the size of the community. In cities of 100,000 popula- tion or more the ratio of children to adults is relatively small. In towns and villages with a population of less than 2500, this ratio is con siderably higher than in large cities, but it is upon the rural farm population that the cost of educating children rests most heavily. Fo: each 1000 adults of the rural farm population in the Southwest and Southeast, there are twice as many children of school age as for each 1000 adults of the population in the large cities. In other regions of the United States the rural farm population is carrying an educational load which is from 65 to 85 percent greater than in the cities. Percent of the Nation’s Children and Percent of the Nation’s Income in Dif- ferent Areas The rural sections of the nation, by and large, are the ones least able to support schools. The states shown to have the least taxpaying ability in the preceding section of this bulletin are for the most part predominantly rural. When these facts are considered in the light of the data presented above, showing that predom inantly rural states and rural areas within states are those which carry the heaviest educational loads, the problem assumes serious proportions. Figure IV, on the opposite page, compares the distribution of the nation’s children with the distribution of the national income among the six geographical regions. In the industrial Northeastern states are 29.65 percent of the nation’s children between the ages of 5 and 13. The people in that section receive about 43 per cent of the national income. By way of contrast, the people of the rural Southeastern states re ceive only 10 percent of the income, yet have over 24 percent (almost one-fourth) of all the children of school age in the nation to feed, clothe, and educate. Similar figures for the other geographic regions are as follows: Mid dle States, 26.05 percent of children and 28.38 percent of total national income; Northwest, 6.25 percent of children and 4.59 percent of in- come ; Southwest, 8.13 percent of children, 5.22 percent of income; Far West, 5.48 percent of children and 9.87 percent of income. Differences in educational opportunity are due to a lack of financial resources in the very states where educational load is heaviest. These differences are not likely to decrease with the passing years. 1 Based upon Senate Hearings on S. 419, p. 44-59. 1 House Hearings on H. R. 5962, p. 33-37. § U. S. Department of Con merce, Bureau of Census. Fifteenth Census of the United States, 1930. ‘‘Population,”’ Vol. II, p. 591. § Leven, M.; Moulton, H. G and Warburton, C. A. America’s Capacity To Consume. Washington, D. ( >.: Brookings Institution, 1934. p. 172 { 165 J ‘NOILW1NdOd NI 9€61-6361 “SNOIDIY AG W 3 ISVIIONI TWANLWN 4O SALVY NI JONWHD LIN 63 ‘ss yb Ol "Tim 2582193 QN3931 A aanold Mersey VPONM. WEPaErtnenmt OF VOMMEercEe, VUrESaYU OF Lensus 10 424.7 4.2 ORes Div Nat Educ Assn | 1929 and 1936 Spec ial Reports for 3 = * a 3 > The Declining Birth-Rate Differences in the rate of natural increase of sulation in various regions of the United Sates tend to perpetuate and increase educa- jonal inequalities.‘ In Figure V the forty-eight sates have been grouped into the six major geo- sraphic regions used by Odum to illustrate these variations. Rates of natural increase in the population, that is, the excess of live births over jeaths per 1000 population, have been used in- sead of crude birth-rates (live births per 1000 estimated population). Tho it is a well-known fact that the national birth-rate has been de- clining, a rapidly decreasing death-rate may vive the false impression that the actual increase n population has not been seriously affected. If : birth-rate falls more rapidly than a death-rate which includes infant mortality) the rate of natural increase will drop correspondingly, in- dicating a decrease in the number of children srowing up to replace the maturing population. \ study of the changes in rates of natural in- crease over a period of years, as shown in Figure V, will reveal the true situation created by de- clining birth-rates in the six major regions of the United States. Regional Variations In comparing the net changes in rates of nat- ural increase in population it is significant that certain regions are experiencing far greater dif- terences between falling birth- and death-rates than are other regions. The national birth-rate dropped from 18.9 in 1929 to 16.6 in 1936, and the death-rate from 11.9 to 11.5, thus produc- ing a met decrease of 1.9 in the rate of natural increase for the nation as a whole. But the rate of natural increase in the Northeast region de- creased 2.7 as compared with a falling off of 0.9 for the Southeast during this same period. The Middle States showed a decrease of 2.2 compared with drops of 0.3 for the Southwest, 1.4 for the Northwest, and 1.5 for the Far West. These regional variations in the net changes between 1929 and 1936 are particu- larly important because of the pronounced dif- terences between the actual rates of natural in- crease for the six geographical regions. In 1929 the Southeast had a 9.5 rate of natural increase compared with 8.9 for the Northwest, 8.1 for 1 Based upon Senate Hearings on S. 419, p. 28-29, 44-59. | House Hearings on H. R. 5962, p University of North Carolina Press, 1936. p merce, Bureau of Census. Vital Statistics, Special Reports, 1929 and 1936. For further reference consult Macmillan Co., 1934 3 Southern Regions of the United States. Chapel Hill Osborn, Frederick. Dynamics of Population. New York the Southwest, 6.4 for the Middle States, 6.1 for the Northeast, and 3.1 for the Far West. Thus the small drop of 0.9 for the Southeast leaves its 1936 rate standing at 8.6, while the net change for the Middle States sets the 1936 figure at 4.2, the rate for the Northeast drops to 3.4, and a decrease of 1.5 gives the Far West a rate of natural increase of only 1.6 for 1936 A comparison of rates of natural increase in 1936 with population estimates for that same year shows that approximately 55 percent of the natural increase is coming from three re gions—Southeast, Southwest, and Northwest that contain altogether only about one-third ot the total population. Conversely, the Northeast, Middle States, and Far West, with 65 percent of the total population, account for only 45 per cent of the total excess of births over deaths. If rates of natural increase continue to decline less rapidly for some years to come in the three regions which contain one-third of the national population, the ratio of children to adults of the productive ages will be disproportionatel\ large in these regions. With the above situation in mind, this trend resulting from the declining birth-rate is of sig nificance in our problem of the inequality of educational opportunity. It has been shown in previous sections of this bulletin that, on the whole, the states of the Northeast, the Middle States, and the Far West are best prepared to bear the costs of an adequate educational op portunity for their children. In all six regions there are notable exceptions to this general clas sification, but it is definitely true that the states which are furnishing the larger propor tion of the nation’s new population are the least able financially to educate it. These states in the Southeast, Southwest, and Northwest have ex tensive rural areas with low incomes and less desirable levels of living. If movement of population from rural to uw ban areas continues, it will be the children of the rural areas who will replace a considerable part of the urban population of the Northeast, Middle States, and Far West. Thus the present trend in rates of natural increase in the six yveographic regions may have a profound eftect on the distribution and social characteristics of the people of the United States. Howard W Department of C¢ Lorimer, Frank 33-34. 7 Odum 7¢u.% Chapters ind { 167 ] FIGURE VI NET MIGRATION OF FARM POPULATION BY REGIONS, 1920-1930 Wines hoe LEGEND BE Ove: 2,000,000 1,000,000-2,000,000 om Under 1,000,000 [] Approximately no net migration Research Division, Nationa Based on the President's Research Committee, ‘Recent Social Trends in the United States." 1933. p. 111. FIGURE VII MOVEMENT OF WEALTH AWAY FROM FARMS, 1920-1930 PERCENT 9 20 40 60 80 100 T t ' Total farm income Wealth | leaving farms Division of wealth leaving farms Cost of care and education of Interest on debts paid by migrants to age of economic farmers to non-farmers productivity Settlement of estates inherited Rs. Rents paid by farmers to y migrants non-farmers Research Division, Nationa! Education’ Ass Based on O. E. Baker's ‘Migrant Wealth and Farmers’ Income" in Annals of Association of American Geographers 33; 85-89; June 1933. [ 168 ] Migration from Farms \fovement of population from farms to non m and urban areas results in a movement of ealth in the same direction.’ In Figure V1 the ipproximate net migration of the rural-farm r population away from farms during the decade 1920 to 1930 is shown for six regions. For com parative purposes the estimates of the move ment of wealth away from farms for the same period are shown in Figure VII. Regional esti mates of the movement of wealth are not avail able, but a clear picture of the situation may be ascertained by consideration of the farm in- comes of the six regions in comparison with their net migration from farms. Migration Moves Wealth Since the World War much of the migration from rural-farm to rural-non-farm and urban areas has come from the Southeast, the eastern corn belt of the Middle States, and the South- west. Approximately 60 percent of the net mi- gration during the decade 1920-1930, or about 3,437,000 people, came from the combined re- gions of the Southeast and Southwest. Negroes constituted one-third of this migration from southern farms. About 24 percent of the migra- tion came from the Middle States alone, and the remaining 16 percent moved from the farms of the Northwest and Northeast regions. Tho the movement from farms in New York and Pennsylvania was relatively large, a net migra- tion to farms in Massachusetts and Rhode Island reduced the average for the Northeast region. In the Far West the extensive move- ment to the farm areas of California counter- balanced the small migration from farms in Oregon, Washington, and Nevada with the re- sult that there was virtually no gain or loss for the non-farm areas of the Far West region dur- ing the decade. In all regions the migrants from farm to city were mostly young people. Not quite a third were under 15 years of age, more than a third were 15 to 25 years of age, and about a tenth were 25 to 35 years old. Non-farm areas ob- tained these people near the beginning of their productive life almost free of cost. The expense of care and education of these migrants up to the age of economic productivity was borne by ‘ Based upon Senate Hearings on S. 419, p. 28-29. § louse Hearings on H. R. 5962, p. 33-34 | . Tt . r ; : . , . + Migration and the National Welfare.”’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers Migration and Economi ence consult Goodrich, Carter, and others. Press, 1936 the rural areas which lost their investment the young persons when they left for no: centers. According to Baker the net migration fro the farms during the decade 1920-1930 sented a contribution of about $14,000,000, 000. ‘This amounts to $1,400,000,000 a year, a sum almost equivalent to the annual value of the wheat crop plus half the cotton crop. ‘To of wealth must be added be $4,000,000 000 this movement tween $3,000,000,000 and which was considered to have gone from farms as estates of farm parents were settled among migrant children, about $7,500,000,000 inter est on debts paid by farmers to non-farmers, and approximately $10,500,000,000 rent paid by farmers to non-farmers. The resultant total of $35,000,000,000, which left farms between 1920 and 1930, represented 56 percent of the total farm income for the decade. This found in all six regions, but the areas of low movement of wealth from farms is farm income naturally suffer most. Again the southern regions are affected out of proportion to other sections of the country because the greatest migration from farms occurred there. The Southeast and Southwest, with meager re sources for taxation, are left with a dispropo: tionately large number of children. The rural sections of the South must support nearly a third of their population in school, the indus trial sections of the North and West less than one-fourth. This means that even when an equal expenditure per adult is made for educa tion, a discrepancy in costs per child remains. Authorities predict that future migration is likely to continue and possibly to accentuate the trends of the decade from 1920 to 1930. The early years of the depression brought a re versal of the direction of migration, and many unemployed city-dwellers trekked ‘“‘back to the land” to seek subsistence security. But, because of the competition of commercial agriculture and the ever increasing attractions of non-farm life, already the movement is again away from that self-sufficing type of farming. In the long run no material change has taken place in the great movement to non-farm centers which has persisted for many decades. { Baker, O. E. ‘“‘Rural-l 85-90; June 1933. For further 1 Opportunity. Philadelphia: University of Pent [ 169 ] FIGURE VIII COMPARATIVE TRENDS IN CORPORATE AND NATIONAL WEALTH Index of Change Based on 1923 } L Corporate 140 }— a _ oe | Wealth | | | | } | 130 [2s Se — T = | | | | | { | j | | | | | | | | | | 120 + = ME © ote ' —- — | | | 110, -/—_—_—_fA-—_____+—___—__+_____ National - fees ™=<«/, pow 2 eee P ae | - Wealth i 4 ~~ _ a a 4 ~ i, Poel 4 ~ Pa 7 => Z ft >a ; 1923 = 100 90 4 | ' | L 1993 1924 1995 1926 1927 1928 1929 Research Division, National Education Associat Based on estimates of national wealth by the National Industrial Conf Board, ‘Conference Board Bulletin,” May 20, 1933; and estimates of the wealth of all non-financial corporations by the Federal Trade Commission, ‘Nationa! Wealth and income" (for 1923) and by Gardiner C. Means, American Economic Review 2: 10-42; March 1931 (for the years 1924-1928 inclusive). [170] Growth in Corporate Ownership of Wealth Growth in corporate ownership and control of wealth is making it increasingly difficult for the states to tap their own economtc resources for the support of education and other publi services. This growth in corporate wealth re- ceived its first major impetus in the develop ment of railroads in this country, spread to other industries, and proceeded at an acceler- ated rate after the World War. Figure VIII compares trends in corporate wealth and total national wealth in the years between 1923 and 1929, as shown by figures compiled by Means, supplemented by data from U. S. Internal Revenue Reports, and estimates by the Federal Trade Commission and the National Industrial Conference Board. Trends in National Wealth and Corporate Wealth The National Industrial Conference Board estimates the amount of our national wealth in 1923 at $339,960,000,000. In the same year corporate wealth equaled $90,507,000,000 or 27 percent of the total. By 1929 national wealth had increased to $361,837,000,000 and corporate wealth to $127,318,000,000—an amount equal to 35 percent of the national wealth. Thus, while the total wealth of the na- tion increased something more than 6 percent in the years between 1923 and 1929, the growth of corporate wealth about 41 percent. Means estimates that in 1929 the two hundred largest corporations alone, controlled wealth equal to about one-fifth of the total national wealth. What does this increasing concentration of wealth in the hands of corporations mean in terms of adequate school support from state sources? In the first place, it means absentee ownership of much of the wealth in the form of natural resources located in some of our states. Absentee ownership may mean removal of this wealth, at least to a large extent, as a source of taxation. Often this movement of wealth is from other parts of the country to- ward the industrial Northeast. For instance, a large corporation organized in the state of Del- aware may run pipe lines for gas or oil out of | the state of Texas to other states and may carry on a large proportion of its business operations was Based upon Senate Hearings on S. 419, p. 227-33; House Hearings on H. R. 5962, p. 260-71; Large Corporation in American Economic Life.’’ American Economic Review 21 in these other states. Ownership may be vested in stockholders scattered all over the country, with a large block of the stock controlled by financial interests in New York City. Such a company probably would pay its corporate or ganization tax in Delaware and would pay only a small proportion of its corporation in come tax, even if one were levied, in ‘Texas. Texas could levy taxes on the property of the corporation located within its borders and it could collect severance or sales taxes on the amount produced or sold within the state but it is dificult to pass legislation levying severance or sales taxes at sufficiently high rates to retrieve the loss in revenues suffered, since competitive efforts of the states to attract business tend to limit the rates of state taxation. Fortunes made by the exploitation of the natural resources lo cated in Texas would be principally taxable i: other states. The creates technical problems in the administra It becomes difh corporate torm of organization ilso tion and assessment of taxes. cult to define each state’s jurisdiction in the taxation of an interstate business and it compli cates the collection of taxes actually levied. The only agency which can alleviate the in justice resulting from the interstate character of our industrial system is the federal govern ment. The provision of federal assistance to the states in support of education, from taxes col lected from the whole nation, would be a step in this adjustment. Federal taxes do not pro duce the disturbance of competitive conditions which often result from unequal rates of state taxes. Some economists believe that the federal government must more and more act the part of the tax collector and distributor. It is already collecting a major portion of the revenues in certain fields of taxation also occupied by the states. It is not intended here to imply that the states of the Northeast are at fault because the movement of wealth is preponderantly in thei: direction. This phenomenon is the natural re sult of many historical and geographical factors. Because of this fact it is all the more true, how ever, that the citizens of these states should ex pect to make some contribution to the well being of those states which are in a less for tunate situation, thru federal aid for education and Means, Gardiner ( The 10-42; March 1931 {171 ] FIGURE IX EFFORT, BASED ON CHISM’'S DATA, REQUIRED TO SUPPORT NATIONAL MINIMUM PROGRAM, 1932 Percent of Tax Resources Required To Support a Defensible Program of $60 per Unit of Educational Need 50 60 70 80 90 100 fo] - °o jro o w °o & Mississippi Alabama South Carolina North Carolina Georgia Arkansas Kentucky Oklahoma New Mexico Tennessee Texas Louisiana Utah Virginia Florida Idaho Wyoming North Dakota Colorado Arizona Kansas Indiana Vermont West Virginia Oregon Wisconsin Michigan Maine Montana Nebraska Missouri South Dakota Minnesota California Washington Ohio Maryland Delaware Pennsylvania lowa Illinois New Jersey NAA - United States 50 60 70 80 90 100 o — ° -] or aw So & Research Division, Nationa! Education [172] ation ——__—— Efforts Required To Support an Adequate School Program Educational inequalities cannot be removed oven tho the states adopt modern tax systems and allot a suitable proportion of resulting rev- enues to the financing of education. The state- ment has sometimes been made that the wide differences in educational opportunities are due less to differences in ability to support schools than to the willingness to do so. Figure LX shows the percent of tax resources in each state which would be required, even under a modern tax plan, to support a mini- mum defensible school program. Ability on the Basis of a Uniform Tax System In October 1933 the National Tax Associa- tion proposed a model tax system. This plan in- cluded a personal income tax levied by the state of residence, a business tax levied in the state where the business is conducted, a tax on tangi- ble property, and supplementary taxes made up of an automobile license tax, gasoline tax, and an inheritance tax. With this plan as a basis, supplemented by a 2 percent general retail sales tax, Chism applied a tax program at uniform and reasonable rates to the 48 states. In this way Chism estimated the relative tax resources of the states under a model tax plan between the years 1922 and 1932. By taking the 1931-32 data it can be shown that even under a uniform system great differ- ences in ability would exist among the states. For example, New York could raise 82 times as much as Nevada; 22 times as much as Missis- sippi; 19 times as much as Arkansas; 2% times as much as California. However, to bring these differences into perspective as related to the sup- port of education it is necessary to take into account the number of children to be educated and the quality of the educational program to be provided. Chism assumes in his investigation that the schools can reasonably claim 31.27 percent of the revenues of each state (the average percent of total tax collection expended on schools in all states in 1932). He then divides this amount for each state by the number of units of educa- tional need in the state. The resulting amounts indicate the ability of the states to support edu- cation as related to the children and to the edu cational program. ‘he range among the states in the value of tax resources per unit of educa tional need is, according to Chism, from $19.45 in Mississippi to $113.57 in Nevada. In other words, the richest state has a per capita taxpay ing ability nearly six times that of the poorest state, Effort Required To Support a Minimum Program If it is assumed that the minimum national educational program should cost $60 per child, it is possible to calculate the total cost of this defensible program in each state. By comparing these totals with the total revenues collected under a uniform tax plan it is possible to dete: mine what proportion of the revenues would be required for school purposes. ‘These proportions are shown in Figure IX. To carry out the proposed minimum national school program Mississippi would need to use almost 100 percent of all revenue produced under a model tax plan. Twelve of the states (Figure 1X) would require 50 percent or more of all revenues for education. Obviously, under such conditions there would be inadequate amounts available for the other services of go ernment in those states. On the other hand, Nevada would require for education only slightly more than 15 per cent of its revenues under a model tax plan. New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and New Jersey could provide a program comparable to the average in the nation by the utilization of only about 20 percent of their tax resources. The obvious conclusions from the foregoing facts are (1) that even tho the states “put their fiscal houses in order” by adopting a uniform model tax plan there would still be great dif ferences in their ability to support education; and (2) that if the states provided a minimum defensible program of education, under a model tax plan, the majority of them would be unable to properly support other necessary services of government. Greater effort on the part of the states, even under ideal conditions of taxation, will not eliminate the underlying causes of in equality in educational opportunity. 1 Based upon Senate Hearings on S. 419; p. 21-26; House Hearings on H. R. 5962, p. 39-43: and Ashby, Lyle W. The Effort f the States To Support Education. Washington, D. C.: Research Bulletin, National Education Association.) National Education Association, 1936. (Also published as May 1936 [173 ] FIGURE X PERCENT OF STATE TAX REVENUES FROM SOURCES OTHER THAN PROPERTY TAXES, 1930 PERCENT 9 ae 2 _60 gs __—_100 T T North Carolina Virginia Tennessee South Carolina Georgia Arkansas Florida Louisiana Alabama Kentucky Mississippi Southeast (Average) = eee Northwest (Average) ae | mm Southwest (Average) Far West (Average) Middle States (Average) Northeast (Average) Research Division, Nationa! Education Based on data from U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, ‘Financial Statistics of States, 1930." { 174] Improvement of State Tax Systems Inequalities in educational opportunity can- not be eliminated by the improvement of state tax systems.’ The preceding section of this bul letin has already demonstrated that if all states operated uniform model tax systems, such as those suggested by Chism and Newcomer, many of them would still be unable to support a sat isfactory school program and at the same time maintain other government services. ‘his sec- tion considers the states which have tax systems most in need of revision. Undoubtedly there is room for improvement in the systems of many states, which would yield increased support of schools and other functions of government. But is this true of the states which are now afford- ing the least adequate educational opportu- nities? How do these states compare in this re- spect with those which rank higher both in the amount of their economic resources and the amount of their pupil expenditures ? It is impossible here to apply all of the cri- teria of a good tax system to the methods of raising revenues used by individual states. One of the first and most universally selected cri- teria of the adequacy of a state tax system is diversification. Figure X uses this criterion, de termined by the percent of state revenues from sources other than property taxes, as a basis for judging the tax systems of the low-pupil-ex- penditure states of the Southeast. Diversification of Revenues Figure I on page 160 of this bulletin has shown that the eleven states with the lowest expenditures per pupil enrolled in 1934 were Mississippi, Arkansas, South Carolina, Geor- gia, North Carolina, Alabama, Kentucky, Ten- nessee, Louisiana, Virginia, and Florida. These are the states which, according to Odum’s grouping, comprise the predominantly rural Southeast region of the country where economic resources are low and educational load is heavy. Not one of these states spent as much as $40 per enrolled pupil for public schools in 1934, and eight of the eleven spent less than $30. Two states spent less than $20. When the criterion of diversification is ap- plied to the tax systems of these states, we dis- cover that not one of them derived as much as a) ‘ Based upon Senate Hearings on S. 419, p. 233-52 State Support for Public Education. Washington, D. C Commerce, Bureau of Census 7 Financial Statistics of States, 19 1 House Hearings on H.R : American Council 7 ; 50 percent of its revenues from general prop erty taxes in 1930. North Carolina and South Carolina raised 100 percent and 85 percent, re spectively, of their total state revenues from non-property tax sources. These other taxes contributed more than 75 percent of state rev enues in Georgia and Arkansas. More than 88 percent of state revenues in Virginia and more than 86 percent in Tennessee were raised by the recently developed tax methods. For the whole Southeast region the average of state revenues from non-property tax sources is 75.1 percent. The only other region which shows so high a percent of state revenues derived from special taxes is the Northeast with 83.7 percent. Simi lar percentages for the other regions are: Mid dle States, 71.5; Far West, 70.3; Southwest 60.2; and Northwest, 60.1. In the states of the Southeast, moreover, the trend toward the increased use of diversified 1930. Ala bama, Arkansas, and Georgia have added sales tax methods has continued since taxes since that year. Florida has enacted new chain store tax laws and raised the rates of gas oline taxes. South Carolina has increased its in come tax rates. Louisiana has adopted a long line of special taxes. There is, without question, room for im provements in many state tax systems which would benefit schools as well as other public services. It is probable that if some of the states in the Middle States and Northwestern regions were to make the same effort to diversify their tax methods as has been made, on the average, by the states of the Southeast, their pupil ex penditures could be raised to a level equal to those of the highest ranking states in this re spect. But it is obvious that diversification has been tried already in the states which are spend ing the least for public school support and fur ther efforts in this direction would, relatively speaking, yield a much lower return than would the same efforts in states which have a large amount of economic resources to draw upon. Educational opportunities can never be equal ized thru state revision of tax systems. Unless the federal government steps in to aid the states where economic resources are least abundant, the democratic ideal of an adequate education for every child will not be realized. 1 R Paes 1932. 1 5962, p. 4 43 Mor Pat nd other on Education, 1 196 S Washington, D. C.: Governr , r Office ent ol! [175] FIGURE XI INDEX OF EDUCATIONAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES, 1926-34 Federal, state, and jlocal expenditures \excluding education State and local “expenditures, ___ excluding education —+TOTAL ENROLMENT ie ~ ” 4 ' jLocal expenditures oo | excluding education 1926= 100 IPublic educationa expenditures 1934 Research Division, National Education Ass Based on “Cost of Government in the United States, 1933-35,"" National Industrial Conference Board; and ‘'Biennia! Survey of Education, 1932-34," Federal Office of Education. School Costs and Other Expenditures That the nation can afford to extend federal vid to education is shown by what the people vay for government and for certain commodt- ties and services.’ During the congressional hearings the question was raised: “Where is Congress to obtain the money required for fed- eral participation in the support of education?” \lembers of Congress who appeared before the House committee pointed out that in 1937 al- most $1,000,000,000 was appropriated for na- tional defense, the largest allotment ever made for this purpose in the peace-time history of the nation. Between 1916 and 1932 Congress sub- sidized the merchant marine to the extent of $3,000,000,000. Where, then, will federal money be found for education? Obviously, what the nation pays for education and other governmental services is a matter of choice on the part of the people and their representatives. Since 1926 governmental expenditures have steadily risen. Between 1926 and 1930 the cost of all types of public education increased and then declined rapidly during the depression years. These trends are shown graphically in Figure XI. Expenditures for Government In 1926 the total expenditure for local, state, and national government amounted to over $10,000,000,000—28 percent of the total being spent by the federal government, 14 percent by the states, and 58 percent by local governments. The combined expenditure in 1926 for public elementary, secondary, and collegiate education totaled $2,250,000,000. Expenditures for all types of government in 1934 amounted to $14,500,000,000—an_in- crease of about 40 percent over the 1926 figure. The federal government spent 46 percent of the total, the states 16 percent, and the localities 38 percent. The total cost of education meanwhile dropped to less than $2,000,000,000—over $500,000,000 under the highest point in 1930. Why did governmental costs increase? Between 1934 and 1936 federal expenditures for veterans’ pensions and benefits rose from $500,000,000 to nearly $2,500,000,000. In this period the postal deficit increased almost $30,- 000,000. In 1936 national defense required nearly twice as much as it did in 1934. An even larger share of the increased cost of 1 Based upon Senate Hearings on S. 419, p. 30, 41. 1 House Hearings on I]. R. 5962, p government has arisen from new and presun ably emergency activities. Federal expenditures for relief and recovery amounted to $892,600, 000 in 1932, increased to $4,000,000,000 in 1934, and then declined to slightly $3,000,000,000 in 1936. Since 1933, federal grants to the states and localities for unem over ployment relief and works projects have been larger than all other types of federal aid com bined. In the one year of 1936 direct payments to the states by the federal amounted to $2,000,000,000. Are certain governmental services developing government at the expense of education? While relief meas ures have been necessary, there is considerable evidence that the need for some new federal services could be prevented if the federal gov ernment assumed its rightful place in the fi nancing of education. Under the circumstances, the people have the right to demand of their legislators that in the selection of fields for fed eral expenditure political expediency shall not be permitted to outweigh larger social consid- erations. Education is one of the most essential and fundamental activities of government, and in the budgeting of the available resources it should be made an effective service to all of the people. Certain Private Expenditures In addition to their choices of various gov ernmental services, the people, thru their ex penditures, indicate certain preferences for va rious commodities and services. By these private expenditures, the nation indicates that it has a high degree of purchasing power. Among the large bills paid by the American people in 1934 were the following: $1,344,000,000 for to bacco; $1,229,073,000 for ice cream, candy, and chewing gum; $600,000,000 for theaters, movies, and similar amusements; and $314.- 368,000 for toilet preparations and beauty par- lor services. In this same year $1,229,400,000 was spent in purchasing new passenger auto- mobiles, and $3,066,304,933 was set aside for life insurance premiums. By 1934 the accumu- lated savings deposits in the United States amounted to nearly $22,000,000,000. Whether the economic ability represented by these facts will be used for the satisfaction of individual or collective wants, the people will decide. 27-28, 124-29, 384-85, 433-36. Also Kimmel, Lewis H. Cost of Government in the United States, 1934-36. New York: National Industrial Conference Board, Inc., 1937, 127 p. { 177] FIGURE XII PERCENT OF FEDERAL TAX COLLECTIONS* FROM TWELVE STATES, 1935 New York North Carolina Pennsylvania Ilinois California Ohio Virginia Michigan Massachusetts New Jersey Kentucky Missouri i i L —_ 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 *including internal revenues and customs receipts, but omitting agricultural adjustment taxes. Research Division, National Education Associa Based on ‘Annual Report of the Secretary of the Treasury for the Year Ending June 30, 1935."" p. 345-46, 355. FIGURE XIII GROWTH IN NUMBER OF STOCKHOLDERS IN THREE LARGE CORPORATIONS Number of Stockholders in Hundreds of Thousands 1 2 3 4 5 6 Z 8 ~ 10 11 _12 T T T | ! T 1 T T T 1910 1920 1930 1934 Research Division, National Education Associa Based on “The Modern Corporation and Private Property" by A. A. Berle and G. C. Means, p. 55; and annual reports of American Teleph and Telegraph Co., the Pennsylvania Railroad, and the United States Stee! Corp. {178 ] The Incidence of Federal Taxation Federal aid for education would place no un- due burden upon states where federal tax col- lections are already relatively large.’ An argu- ment frequently advanced against any extension of federal aid for education runs as follows. Federal aid payments now made vary widely smong the states and bear no relation to the amounts contributed by the individual states toward the support of the federal government. Any extension of federal aid, distributed on the basis of need, would only increase the discrep- incy between federal each state and the amount of federal aid re- tax collections within ceived. States already carrying a large share of federal government costs should not be ex pected to contribute still more for aid from which they would receive a less than propor tionate return. In refutation of this argument, Figures XII and XIII, on page 178, present statistics on the proportionate contributions of taxes collected in twelve states to total federal tax revenues and on the incidence of federal corporation income tax payments. Relation of Area of Collection to Incidence of Federal Taxes Generally speaking, the place where federal taxes are collected gives no indication whatso- ever of the place where these taxes are ulti- mately paid. In the last analysis, it is the indi- vidual citizen who pays federal taxes, regardless of where they are collected. Figure XIII shows the proportion of these taxes coming from the twelve states in which collections were highest in 1936. It will be noted that New York, according to the data of this chart, is credited with over 25 percent of total collections. But were these taxes ac- tually paid by the citizens of New York state ? The Bureau of Internal Revenue figures show that about one-fifth of the total federal revenue collected in New York consisted of customs duties imposed at the Port of New York. The purchaser of an imported Paris gown may be a resident of New York, or of any other city or state in the nation. Yet New York is credited with the payment of this tax in the federal reports where it is often misin- terpreted as an actual contribution made by the people of that state to the federal government. 1 Based upon Senate Hearings on S. 419, p. 33-37, 127-34 Annual Report of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1935, 1935, p. 345-46, 355. 1 House Hearings on H. R Approximately another one-fifth of federal tax collections in New York state consists of corporation income taxes. Economists generally agree that the corporation income tax is shifted backward to the stockholders instead of for ward to the consumers of the products sold by the corporation. This being so, the facts pre sented in Figure XIII are of interest. This chart shows a growing diffusion of corporate ownership among small, or relatively small, stockholders. A previous section of this bulletin has shown an increasing concentration of the wealth of the nation in the control of corpora but counterbalanced by an this movement is to some extent tions, Increasing number of stockholders. It is these stockholders who ult ] CUI mately pay the corporation income taxes lected in New York. ranking state with respect to The second the percent of federal taxes collected is North Carolina. North Carolina, with only cent of the nation’s population and 1.5 percent 2.6 per of the national income, is credited with having paid 8.3 percent of total federal taxes. The fed North Carolina, how ever, consisted of over $231,000,000 of taxes eral taxes collected in on tobacco products manufactured in the state and collected at the source. This $231,000,000 was not paid by residents of North Carolina but by tobacco users thruout the nation. Thus, the citizens of New York and North Carolina are not bearing as heavy a burden of federal government costs as the statistics on federal tax collections would, at first thought, seem to indicate. The same conclusion is war ranted with respect to the shares of federal taxes collected in other states, especially the ten XII. Manufac- turers’ excise taxes and liquor taxes, which con states shown in Figure stitute important items of federal tax income under the Revenue Acts of 1932 and 1934, are collected at the source, the same as tobacco taxes. Like tobacco taxes they are paid by con sumers thruout the nation. Any increase in the cost of the national government due to federal assistance in the support of education would be slight in comparison with the cost of other services that recently have been added. But whatever its amount, the incidence of this cost would be widely distributed. 46-47. 7 U. S. Treasury Secretary of the Treasury, 5962, p 94-95, and Annual Report of the [179 ] FIGURE XIV GAIN AND LOSS THRU INTERSTATE MIGRATION, 1920-1930 Born in State Living in Other States Hundred Thousand _= 5 8 9. 8 Living in Born in ¢ Maine New Hampshire Born in State iv Living in Other States Borr state ther States Hundred Tt __16 — a North Dakota South Dakota Vermont Nebraska Massachusetts Kansas Rhode Island Montana Connecticut Idaho New York W yoming New Jersey Colorado Pennsylvania Utah Delaware Virginia Maryland *® North Carolina West Virginia South Carolina Ohio Georgia Indiana Florida Minors Kentucky Michigan Tennessee Wisconsin Alabama Minnesota Mississippi lowa Arkansas Missouri Louisiana Oklahoma Nevade Texas Washington New Mexico Oregon Aritona California Gam 1920 Gam 1930 *including District of Columbia Research Division, Nationa! Education / Based on the Federal Census for 1920 and for 1930, U. S. Department of Commerce. Asso Mobility of Population The mobility of population makes the educa- tion of children in all states of national con- ern’ The migration of the population from farm to non-farm areas, as discussed in a pre ‘ous section, is one problem when it occurs within a state and quite another when it be comes interstate. Figure X1V shows graphicaily the gain and loss thru interstate migration, as indicated by state of birth and state of residence jata from the census, 1920 and 1930. Only native population, that is, population born in the United States, is being considered. By srouping the states into the six geographic regions referred to in earlier sections the areas of greatest mobility are plainly seen. A Problem for All States Population is being constantly redistributed thru migration, largely motivated by repulsion from areas of low economic opportunity and attraction to areas offering greater economic, social, and cultural advantages. Attracted by new opportunities in manufacturing and com- merce, many people moved into the industrial area around the Great Lakes, into California, and back into the Middle Atlantic States dur- ing the decade following the World War. Be- tween 1920 and 1930 the territory New York City gained 1,120,000 native-born people; the Great Lake States of Michigan, Ohio, and Illinois added around 700,000 native white migrants to their population; and the Pacific Coast States of Oregon, Washington, and California showed a net gain of about 1,750,000 people during the ten-year period. The movement of 1,600,000 native-born people into California alone was phenomenal. Texas, Florida, and Maryland (including the District of Columbia) were other areas with net gains in population thru migration. In all cases the economic attractiveness of these sections of the country drew migrants from the less favored areas. Balancing these net gains thru interstate migration are the losses in two sections of the country: (1) the states south of the Ohio and Potomac and east of the Mississippi Rivers, around except Florida; and (2) the Rocky River, except Arizona and ‘Texas. These areas the states between Mountains and the Mississippi each lost about 1,700,000 persons. In addition, about 115,000 moved out of New England, and around 390,900 migrated from northern Pennsylvania. This movement of people in and out of state presents a significant problem for education It is not surprising that the states with bette: educational opportunities are attracting the These migrants enter such states, California, for ex greater proportion of new residents. ample, with conglomerate educational back grounds granted them by the states of thei birth, childhood, and early adolescence. Nat urally, many of these people from other for tunate states make distinct contributions to the educational level of the citizenry of California by bringing with them superior training. How ever, the proportion of migrants who come into the state from less favored areas is large. In 1930, 29 percent of the native population living in California but born in other states had come from the 19 states which in 1929-30 had spent less for education per pupil enrolled than the average for the continental United States. It is important to recognize that internal migration affects the life of receiving communi ties quite as profoundly as immigration from other countries as long as there is wide disparity in educational opportunities among the several states. The interchange of people and of ideas from region to region is becoming more rapid The impact and conflict of divergent social traditions demonstrate clearly the federal aid for education. The richer states anc need for those whose educational systems already rank considerably above the average of the country need not be moved by altruism to participate in any program of national equalization. From a purely selfish point of view, if nothing else, these very states are concerned in the develop ment of superior schools in all the other states, for it is from these other states that many of the wealthiest states gain their future popula tion. 1 Based upon Senate Hearings on S. 419, p. 61-63. { House Hearings on H. R. 5962, p. 80-86. § Dorn, Harold F. and Lorimer, Frank, “Migration, Reproduction, and Population Adjustment.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 188:280-89; November 1936. U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census figures for 1920 and 1930. For further reference consult: Goodrich, Carter, and others. Migration and Economic 1936. { President’s Research Committee on Social Trends. Recent Social Trends in the United States. New Book Co., 1933. Chapter I. Pennsylvania Pres McGraw Hill Opportunity. Philadelphia: University of York Further Questions on Federal Aid Preceding sections of the bulletin have pre- sented the social and economic facts which make federal aid for education imperative. In spite of these facts certain questions regarding federal aid arise. Some of the problems raised have to do with federal aid in general, some are questions about the principles and practises to be used in a federal program, and a few ques- tions may have to do with the specific pro- visions of legislative proposals. It is the pur- pose of this section to consider briefly several issues raised in the recent congressional hear ings. Does Federal Aid Mean Federal Control of Education? First, it is necessary to agree as to what is meant by “federal control.” The use of the term may refer to the fact that federal agencies will have to divide the available money, audit accounts, and make sure that the provisions of the law are carried out. Since most people are agreed that there should be minimum require- ments and safeguards in the distribution of public funds, this type of “federal control” need not be objectionable. A properly drawn law, however, would reduce even fiscal ad- ministration to a minimum. A second and more common use of the term “federal control” refers to the possibility that state and local direction of education might be endangered. Those who raise this question are afraid not only of the loss of state and local control but of the danger that courses of in- struction would be prescribed from Washing- ton. In this way public education might be re- duced to a dead level of uniformity and might become a powerful instrument of propaganda for whatever political faction is in control at a given time. It does not follow, however, that federal interference with the administrative control of states and localities must necessarily accompany federal appropriations to education. Two ways of preventing federal direction are: (1) to appropriate funds for education in gen- eral, not for special subjects or types of train- ing; and (2) to provide in the legislation spe- cific prohibitions against the exercise of un- desired authority by federal officials. Should Federal Aid Be Provided Befor,. the States Have Eliminated Allegeg Inefficiencies in School Administra tion? The fact that there are thousands of room schools is often cited as a willingn: many states to go on using obsolete org tion. It is contended by some that fede: will only tend to perpetuate existing tions; that not until states eliminate poo: ministrative organization, equalize educat opportunity within state boundaries, and taxes comparable to best practise shoul federal government assume its rightful in school support. Questions of educational opportunity w state boundaries and of the progressive: states in adopting new methods of tay have been analyzed statistically in previo tions. There is abundant room for differ: of opinion and experimentation in many of educational management. The facts that many states, and particularly the p ones, are making more than an average ef to modernize their school administration tax systems. There is reason, too, for beli that thru federal aid the reorganizatio: improvement of state school systems wou! speeded up. Whether it does or not, it is diff to justify the penalty imposed upon child by withholding federal aid simply becaus« provements in school machinery are not ceeding as rapidly as some may wish. Why Should the Federal Government Have an Interest in the Education Its People? Education is a state function. No proy was made in the Constitution for the fed government to organize and to finance a tem of public schools. It is contended that { eral appropriations for education means assumption of state prerogatives not cont plated by the Founding Fathers. Under the American form of governn the final power and authority rest upon the w of the people as expressed by the ballot. ‘This no less true of the federal government than state and local governments. It is necess therefore, that the federal government, es, and the communities provide oppor nities whereby every person may acquire the attributes necessary to exercise intelligently Jefore honestly, and effectively the privilege of suf lleged frage. Immediately after the American Revolu tion articles, pamphlets, and books revealed the Primary has been placed bulleti : : the Dulletin upon th federal must be added the political argument economic tactors ‘To th A citizer aid to education a necessity listra- reign states is none the { nder the Constitut the United States guarantees to every state While the Oo ganization and administration of education | nterest of many in the function of education of one of the sove the new social order. Washington, Jefferson, a citizen of the nation . John Quincy Adams, and others less well known anticipated in their writings many edu republican form of government cational developments of the past century and a half. As Charles A. Beard has pointed out, “They nearly all insisted that there should major function of state governments the finan cial support of which the federal government cannot continu education is a_ responsibility be a nationwide system of popular education, universal . . . supported by general taxation, to avoid without endangering democracy itself Beard, Charles A and Beard, Mary R. The Rise of American Civilization. New York: Macmillar RELATED NUMBERS OF THE RESEARCH BULLETIN The Ability of the States To Support Education. January-March 1926. 96 p. 50¢. Can the Nation Afford To Educate Its Children? November 1928. 48 p. 25¢. Can the States Afford To Educate Their Children? January 1929. 44 p. 25¢. The Outlook for Rural Education. September 1931. 72 p. 25¢. Estimating State School Efficiency. May 1932. 68 p. 25¢. The Nation’s School Building Needs. January 1935. 36 p. 25¢. Efforts of the States To Support Education As Related to Adequacy and Ability. May 1936. 64 p. 50¢. iment sadings Financing Public Education. January 1937. 56 p. 50¢. Vision edera All orders for publications should be accompanied by funds in payment for same and must be so accom a sys panied when orders for material amount to $1.00 or less. Orders not accompanied by funds in payment are the National Education Associa subject to transportation charges. Make checks or money orders payable to tion, 1201 Sixteenth Street, N. W., Washington, D. ¢ nment e will This is lan oO! >ssary, 4 the HE PREAMBLE to the Constitution of the United States declares that the Constitution is ordained and established “in order to form a more perfect Union, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common de fense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.”’ It is an obvious fact to enlightened people everywhere that none of these blessings is possible unless each genera- tion of citizens is educated. Hence the schools are our most fundamental public institutions and are a matter of first concern for our govern- ment.—Senator Pat Harrison. Introduction nce the World War increasing attention :s been given to the social studies program of elementary and This reased interest has been shown in part by secondary schools. In oreat ictivity in the preparation of courses of study, by the appearance of numerous new textbooks ind supplementary materials, and by the spe- cial reports of various professional groups.' Yet in all these extensive activities little effort has been made, at least on a national scale, to prol ™ the depths of the experience of classroom teach ers. The present study is an attempt to explore this little known area. Thru the cooperation of 1764 classroom teachers, the Research Division s able to present facts and opinions of interest to both instructors and administrators. Method of Procedure In September 1936 city superintendents of schools were asked to supply the names of ele mentary, junior high-, and senior high-school teachers who gave all or a large share of their time to the teaching of the social studies. The term “social studies” was defined as “‘the topics ind the courses ordinarily designated as his tory, geography, economics, current events, sociology, social problems, problems of Ameri an democracy, and general social studies.” About one-third (942) of the superintend ents of schools in cities over 2500 in popula tion supplied a total of 6776 names, divided ibout equally among the three school levels, elementary, junior high, and senior high. If in- structions were followed, all were teachers of ‘recognized ability who had been teaching at least two years in the school to which they are now assigned.” Copies of a questionnaire (reproduced on pages 247-54 of this bulletin) were mailed in November 1936 to the 6776 teachers recom mended by superintendents. The inquiry form defined the panied by a letter requesting the cooperation of the recipients. Without any administrative in fluence by superintendents or a second request trom the Research Division, 1764, or 26.0 percent, of the teachers returned usable replies. “c ° . ” social studies” and was accom ‘For example, various reports of the National ntendence; (2) Implications of Social-Economic Goals for Historical Association (available from Charles Scribner’s Sons For example, ‘““‘The Questionnaire,”’ Research Bulletin of Education . Edu National Council on the Social Studies. Also numerous monograph New the As listribution of blanks [able | lhe extent ot the replies is shown in Limitations of the Study limitation is that the basi t he tor the study were obtained by questionnaires first Since several professional publications have inalyzed the weaknesses of this procedure it be this The inquiry will not necessary to discuss them at form was formulated as pol carefully as possible to insure thoughtful and nt. iccurate responses, and the completenes oT most of the replies was reassuring. A second limitation is that the survey was confined to city school systems. It was necessary resources to ‘do this because of the time and available to the Research Division. The restriction of the study to teachers ot recognized ability with at least two vears’ ex perience in their present assignments consti tutes a third limitation. Obviously, it was ne« essary to take a sampling from among the thou sands of teachers who give all or a portion ot their time to the social studies. Since the pri mary purpose of the study was to obtain com petent judgment on instructional problems and the to ascertain facts on superior practises, selective criteria of ability and experience ap peared to be amply justified. Some of the char acteristics of the respondents and the communi ties which they represent are shown in Table 2 Except for city size these characteristics are based upon teacher opinions. Participants in the study were asked to rate themselves as radicals, liberals, conservatives, or reactionaries on social questions. Therefore, a term such as “liberal teachers” as used thruout the bulletin really means “teachers who rated themselves as liberals.” In much the same way teachers indicated the predominant attitude of parents on social questions, the economic status of the community near the school, the general type of community (residential, factory, etc.), and the predominant nationality group. In each case these ratings were the opinions of the teachers and should be so interpreted when presented thruout this report (1) 1 1937; and Commiss earbook of the Departme: cent yearbooks and the Studie ociation tion Social the York) National Educat No . 189 | TABLE 1—NUMBER OF QUESTIONNAIRES SENT OUT AND TABULATE! GEOGRAPHICAL AREAS AND BY CITY SIZE Cities Cities Cities Cities Cities 2,500-5,000 5,000-10,000 10,000-30,000 30,000-100,000 over 100,000 Tota population population population population population Geographical area Num Nun Bianks Re- Blanks Re- Blanks Re- Blanks Re- Blanks Re ber ber sent plies sent plies sent plies sent plies sent plies sent re celyv 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 New England 15 4 93 17 314 75 144 40 100 34 666 1 Middle Atlanti 225 53 268 58 611 163 318 94 291 84 1,713 r East North Central 208 37 243 53 440 «111 380 «121 254 96 1,525 $1 West North Central 196 30 99 26 293 80 108 31 138 73 R34 4 South Atlantic 24 6 61 11 o4 13 163 31 134 45 476 10 East South Central 23 4 46 0 42 9 42 5 86 14 39 ; West South Central 51 3 102 11 111 26 53 23 161 65 478 ] Mountain 65 10 81 20 71 11 37 10 24 10 278 Pacific o4 11 55 9 193 52 85 39 140 46 567 15 Total 901 158 1,048 205 2.169 540 1,330 394 1,328 467 6,7/6 1 64 Percent returned of blanks sent to each city-size group 17.5 19.6 24.9 29.6 35.2 Finally, the question may be raised as to whether or not 1764 teachers are enough to represent truly the opinions of teachers of rec- ognized ability and experience. No final answer can be given on this question. First, it is with great difficulty that estimates can be made of the total number of teachers of social studies in elementary and secondary schools. In the second place, it is a matter of judgment as to how many of the total number, in the estima tion of their respective superintendents, have the necessary ability and experience to have qualified for the survey. Because of these limitations, particularly the last one mentioned, most of the data in the bulletin are presented in terms of city size and school levels only. Other classifications (see Table 2), such as the characteristics of the communities and the attitudes of the teachers, were used in tabulating the replies. Most of these results, based upon the grouping of teach- ers according to these other classifications, show no statistically significant relationships between the classification factors and the findings. The few that are reliable have been included from time to time thruout the report. With respect to city size and school level, especially the latter, differences in the reports from teachers are large enough to be sta- tistically significant. That is to say, when the teachers are grouped by grade level, and in 8 The probable error was computed for each percent and the critical ratio of the difference in each most cases by city size, the findings diff such a way as to indicate a reliable corre| with these two classification factors. The letin includes only those differences whic! sufficiently large that there is a nine-out chance that a difference in the same dir that is, favoring the same classification would be found if other samplings of te were investigated.* Plan of the Bulletin The data are presented in general same sequence as the questions in the o1 inquiry form. Part I deals with the object of social studies instruction; first, in te: their estimated importance and, second, t! gree of adequacy with which they are Part II treats the adequacy and importa: certain areas of instruction. Part III consists of an analysis of cou: study in terms of teachers’ practises and p: ences. This section is followed by Part I\ viewing the methods and aids in teachin, formation is given not only of the te actually used and preferred, but of the su mentary sources available and found to be useful. Parts V and VI deal with two specific | lems: first, the teaching of controversial is and, second, the use of the community social studies laboratory. comparison ot No difference in percents is reported unless the critical ratio is 1.9 or higher. [ 190 ] ee A Ge 2 A oe es. a iar +> TA DY rm j [B30] jU—UBTaIO 4 uZ1910 4 a AIO} a | jooyos punoswe AuNUIWIOD JO adA] 000'00T 4240 000'00 1-000 '0¢ 000'0¢ —000°01 000°0T —000'S 0000'S -O0S'Z AYO JO 8ZI5 s £ Zz Jequinyy wusv10g Jequinyy yue210g Jequiny ju9019g sequinyy qu9019g i senna UONVIgISSE]>) AZAUNS NI GALNASAAdAA SAILINNWWOOD GNV SYAHOVAL AO SOILSIMALOVAYVHD ANOS—Z AIAVL Part VII consists primarily of the standard tests reported by teachers as most helpful in evaluating their teaching of the social studies. Part VIII presents lists of the textbooks most frequently used at the various school levels. Uses of the Bulletin The contents of the bulletin may be of value Parts II and VI may be suggestive with regard to the grade to curriculum committees. placement of social studies topics. Parts II] and V should be helpful in matters of devices and aids. Part VIII suggests the many helpful textbooks which are now available. Many sections of the bulletin represent the considered opinion of teachers results of controlled research studies. suggests the possibility of using the | extensive professional investigation tion with the in-service training of Principals and supervisors will port, as indeed many have already fou questionnaire itself, challenging topics { fessional study and discussion. Individual teachers will discussion offers many suggestions for disc over provement of their own work. The f the bulletin is based upon actual classro periences of others should increase bility of usefulness to most teachers. HEN WE COME TO THE PURPOSES of the social studies in the school, we face the question of our thought about them and our desires. The billions of facts recorded in books on history, economics, politics, and sociology, or any selections of them, do not tell us what use we must make of them, any more than chemicals in themselves tell us whether they are to be employed to poison neighbors or to heal the sick. We ourselves individually and in groups decide the question of purposes and uses. Since matters of opinion enter at this point, we necessarily find more or less variety in our thoughts. Yet on many points there is agreement, such a general agreement that large numbers of us can work together in a certain way and go along together a certain distance. It is true that some educators in the United States hold that schools should merely incul cate a love of the good life for the individual or a purely “scientific” spirit and that it is not the business of the schools to make “‘good citizens,” or use learning as a means to any ends. But the number of such persons is small. Doubtless the great majority of people believe that it is the function of the social studies to serve some purposes.—1936 Yearbook, Department of Superintendence. p. 56-57. I. Objectives of the Social Studies Curriculum What are the prime purposes of the social studies program? Which of these objectives do reachers think are of first importance in ele mentary schools, in junior high schools, and in senior high schools? In the opinion of teachers, do these objectives shift in their relative im portance? Do feel that under present conditions these objectives are classroom teachers being adequately met? Before proceeding to the more definite fields of content and method, it is highly desirable that some attention be paid to the goals of social science instruction. Relative Importance of Objectives Objectives in education serve two primary purposes: (1) as guides to the curriculum maker in selecting the large areas of experience and subjectmatter, and (2) as goals for teach ers and pupils in selecting specific activities of the classroom and in judging the effectiveness of instruction. Objectives may be classified as either immediate or ultimate. They may also be classified as those of (1) general education, (2) subjects, (3) grades, and (4) teaching units. Many examples of these vari- specific ous types may be found in professional litera- ture and in current course-of-study bulletins. Objectives selected for study—As a basis for obtaining the opinions of classroom teachers the present study used the statement of objectives published in The Social Studies Curriculum,’ the 1936 Yearbook of the Department of Superintendence (now known as the Amer- ican Association of School The original list of objectives in the year- book included only the first four in the follow- ing list. For the purpose of locating teachers who might still emphasize the “‘subjectmatter”’ aim, a fifth statement was included in the in- quiry. A few slight changes in the original wording were made in the interest of brevity and clarity. The statements used and a brief characterization of each are as follows: Administrators). (1) To give pupils the truest and most realistic knowledge that is possible of the com- ' For a statement of social-economic goals of America consult /mplications of Social-Economi by the National Education Association, 1937, 126 p. For a historical treatment of the Sciences, consult Rolla M. Tryon’s The Social Sciences as School Subjects, Part XI of the Social Studies, American Historical Association, published by Charles Scribner’s Sons, New treatment of the nature and objectives of the social studies see Charles A American Historical Association, 1934, 236 p of the report of the Commission on the Social Studies * National Education Association, Department of Superintendence 56-59. This statement of objectives may Washington, D. C.: the Department, 1936. p. references cited in the first footnote above »rld—the social and phys hich realism. A r Slate munity, 1 al setting in the \ liz Cc. I he essence of this objective is teacher who worked toward this goal would of necessity avoid a purely idealistic and highly generalized picture of human affairs. He would require freedom to point out the conflicting groups in society and to deal with controversial issues. (2) To prepare pupils for promoting a wiser and more effective cooperation among regions, areas, individuals, groups, states, and nations—a cooperation interracial, interrellt gious, and intereconomic. Here the emphasis is upon increasing interdependence in society. In struction aimed toward this goal would of necessity deal with the changing nature of American civilization, the trend away from rugged individualism and the increase in asso ciational and cooperative activities. > (3) To develop character by giving pupils a love of truth, an appreciation of the beautiful, a bent toward the good, and a desire and will to use knowledge for beneficent social ends. Obviously this objective stresses the character training aspects of the social studies. The at tainment of this aim would require emphasis upon the social values, the mores, and standards of people both in the past and in the present (4) To train in the intellectual processes indispensable to the functioning of society, such as: skill in locating sources of information on social questions, skill in using these sources skill in exploring and stating both sides of con troversial questions, skill in selecting and veri fying information, and skill in discussing social problems. In this case the emphasis is upon the intellectual processes necessary for individual effectiveness in group living. Content is by im plication secondary in importance to the meth ods necessary to develop certain habits, skills, and attitudes. (5) To give pupils knowledge of historical, geographical, social, political, and economic facts which may be of importance to them in Goals for Education, published values and purposes of various social report of the Commission on the York, 1935, 541 p. For a general Beard’s The Natmre of the Social Sciences, Part VII Studies Curriculum. Fourteenth Yearbook be compared with those given fn the The Social [ 193 ] later life. Most teachers will recognize in this objective the emphasis upon cataloged facts ob- tained primarily from past events. The cur riculum organized on the basis of ‘“‘subject matter-set-out-to-be-learned”’ assumes that the acquisition of certain so-called essentials ade- quately prepares one for future civic duties. this goal has led in the of the interests of the Primary emphasis on past to subordination learner and to neglect of instruction in the activities of contemporary social life. No statement of objectives consists of items which are mutually exclusive. Nor have there been many teachers, even in the past, who have focused their efforts upon a single goal to the exclusion of all others. However, it seemed pertinent for the present investigation to see whether or not there were differences of opin- ion as to the importance of the foregoing ob- jectives at the various school levels. It seemed the which teachers thought the objectives were pertinent also to determine degree to being successfully obtained. Competent judg- ment on these points may suggest the possibility of redirection of current practises in social studies instruction. Teacher opinion as to the relative importance of objectives for various grade levels—To dis- cover which objectives should receive major TABLE 3.—JUDGMENTS OF SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS AS TO THE RELA attention at the various school levels t were asked to rate each statement as great importance, “2” of secondary impo and “3” of minor importance. The tot ber of teachers and the percent makir Table 3. In th the objectives are listed in accordance w evaluation are shown in rank order of composite judgment of tance, The order of arrangement in Table considerable interest. Both elementary ar ondary teachers placed the “‘character’’ tive first and “subjectmatter” at the bott the list. Of all the teachers giving the ions, about three in four rated characte cation of great importance. On the othe: about one in four believed that subject: was of primary importance. With refer the three other objectives, the ratings of s ary teachers differed considerably from t elementary teachers. Senior high-school ers particularly believed that realism, pendence, and the intellectual process of inquiry apparently should assume a posit greater importance at the secondary leve The general pattern of Table 3 is ur edly explained by the current trend of t! not only in social studies instructior among all teachers. Subjectmatter as TIVE IMPORTANCE OF OBJECTIVES Objectives 2 Elem. J.H.S. S.H.S. I. To develop character by giving pupils a love of truth, etc. Elem. J.HS. S.H.S. To give pupils the truest and most realistic knowledge, et« Elem. J.H.S. a wiser among To prepare pupils for and more effective regions, etc. promoting cooperation To train in the intellectual processes in- dispensable to the functioning of society, etc. To give pupils knowledge of historical, geographical, social, political, etc. Read table as follows: 78.5 percent of the 534 elementary-school teachers who rated Percent of teachers rating each objective as of Total nu of teact rating ¢ object Secondary importance Great importance 3 ‘ 6 Little importance 45 the importance of Objective I it was of great importance for attention at the elementary-school level. Only about 22 percent of the 511 elementa teachers rating Objective V thought that it was of great importance for attention at the elementary-school level. [ 194] FIGURE I TEACHER OPINION AS TO RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF TWO SOCIAL STUDIES OBJECTIVES PERCENT 50 CHARACTER Elementary Junior High Senior High SUBJECTMATTER Elementary Junior High Senior High Great importance Eo | Little importance Secondary importance = For details consult Table 3. Research Division, National Education Associat as been definitely subordinated, at least in theory and in discussion, to objectives such as character development. It is not surprising then find the opinions of teachers of recognized ility conforming to the more generally ac- epted view. Whether or not typical practise iso conforms is a question which no inquiry form can determine. Importance of objectives on the basis of assifications other than grade levels—Special tabulations on the basis of city size (not re ported in tables in this bulletin) reveal few mportant differences in teacher opinion. How ever, realism in teaching, emphasis on interde- pendence, and training of the intellectual proc- ess for social inquiry were most often stressed n the cities over 100,000 in population. The proportion of first importance ratings on these tems declined consistently down to the smallest of 2,500 to 5,000 population. If these three objectives should and are to receive in- creased emphasis, it appears that the responsi- bility rests most heavily upon the teachers and administrators of the smaller communities. Adequacy of Attainment of Objectives A complete educational program should ir clude not only the setting up of desirable goals effort to ward these objectives. One method of appraisal but systematic appraise progress to is by means of standardized or new-type tests Other less objective measures are teacher opin ions which may or may not be based upon both tests and observation of changes in pupils. In classroom teachers were the present study asked to give their judgment as to the degree to which the social studies in their schools met each of the five objectives. success in attaining T ea her the objectives indicated the degree of attainment of the ob opinion as to The scale upon which teachers jectives in their schools included four items: (1) in large measure; (2) adequately; (3) to a limited degree; and (4) not at all. The dis tribution of the replies on this request is given by school levels in Table 4. The objectives are listed in Table 4 on the basis of the proportion of teachers rating each objective as attained “in large measure” and [195 ] FIGURE II ) TEACHER OPINION AS TO DEGREE OF ATTAINMENT OF TWO SOCIAL STUDIES OBJECTIVES PERCENT 50 SUBJECTMATTER Elementary L hia Junior High Senior High CHARACTER Elementary Junior High Senior High In large measure [ Adequately To a limited degree Be Not at 4 TABI For details consult Table 4. Research Division, National Education A “adequately.” For example, 70.9 percent of the elementary teachers rated the “subjectmatter” (V) objective as attained at least adequately, if not “in large measure.” Even larger propor- tions of the junior high- and senior high-school teachers rated the objective (V) similarly. Ob- jective III (interdependence) was thought by only 48.8 percent of the elementary teachers to be attained adequately or better. The corre- sponding proportion of junior high-school teachers was 51.0 percent and of senior high- school teachers, 43.4 percent. Looking at it another way, only with regard to Objective V (subjectmatter) and Objective II (realism) were the majority of the teachers rather positive that the goals were attained either adequately or in large measure. On Ob- jective I (character) the elementary teachers were still rather sure of the success of their schools; junior high-school teachers were less sure; and a majority (57.7 percent) of the senior high-school teachers marked the ratings “to a limited degree” or “not at all.” A similar condition of uncertainty of success held true with Objective IV (intellectual processes) ex- cept that here a majority of the senior school teachers were sure that adequa better was attained. Of all the teachers Objective III (interdependence) about believed that the degree of attainment was tainly not adequate. What do the composite ratings mean assume that the opinions of these teache reasonably fair measures of success of! schools ? Apparently, in connection with ( tives I (character), IV (intellectual esses), and III (interdependence), there be impediments to a reasonable level of att ment. Do these difficulties lie in the train the teachers, the methods used, the qua! the supplementary materials, or in the ences upon pupils outside of the schools? cases of Objectives V and II is there no sion for further professional investigation tho 70 to 80 percent of the teachers be! achi that adequate success had been Further questions on the significance of ' findings are raised under the next center | ing: “Comparison of Importance and quacy Ratings of Objectives.” [ 196 } Acie hers’ opintons on adequacy of attain- of objectives when classified in terms ther than grade levels—Tabulations on the hasis of city size did not reveal any important litterences With regard to Objective I (character) and Obiective IV (intellectual processes) the spe- al tabulations show certain reliable differ- ences. For example, relatively more of the teachers who rated themselves as conservative believed that Objective I was adequately at tained than of those who rated themselves as liberals. This difference may indicate merely that “liberal” teachers are more skeptical of their success in teaching character than are ‘conservative’ instructors. Perhaps supervisors need to cultivate a more general skepticism mong the latter. In the communities of the Table 2) teachers showed marked differences of opinion with regard to Objective IV (in- various types tellectual processes). This objective was be lieved to be adequately met more often in American communities than in those of pre- dominantly foreign populations. ‘The estimaced degree of adequacy of treatment also dropped consistently with decreases in economic level In communities considered liberal by the teach ers the degree of attainment of Objective IV was thought to be higher than in the conserva tive districts. These differences suggest several \re foreign-born, and con problems for teachers and supervisors. pupils in the poorer, servative communities less responsive to present directed toward the Objective IV? Would a study and needs of these communities reveal the pos methods attainment of of the nature sibility of other methods and content in social studies instruction? Has success in attainment of Objective LV been caused by a lack of oppor tunity? Comparison of Importance and Ade- quacy Ratings of Objectives It will be apparent that the objectives are not listed in the same order in Tables 3 and 4. For example, in Table 3 the composite judg TABLE 4.—JUDGMENTS OF SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS AS TO THE DEGREE OF ATTAINMENT OF EACH OBJECTIVE IN THEIR SCHOOLS Objectives 1 V. To give pupils knowledge of historical, geographi cal, social, political, and economic facts whic! be of importance to them in later life. may To give pupils the truest and most realistic know edge that is possible of the community nation, and world—the social -in which they live. state ind physical setting To develop character by giving pupils truth, an appreciation of the beautiful toward the good, and a desire and will t knowledge for beneficent social ends. To train in the intellectual processes indispensable to the functioning of society, such as: skill locating sources of information on social questions skill in using these sources, skill in exploring and stating both sides of controversial questions, skill in selecting and verifying information, and skill ir discussing social problems. To prepare pupils for promoting a wiser and mor effective cooperation among regions, areas, indi viduals, groups, communities, states, and nations a cooperation interracial, interreligious, and inter economic. Read table as follows: 21 percent of the 515 elementary-school teachers 49.9 percent Similarly read other items. Column 7 shows that a few teachers at various grade le\ Roman numbers preceding each objective that their own schools attained this objective in large measure; 4 number of teachers at each grade level see Table 2 Percent reporting each adequacy rating Total number of teachers rating each objective In Toa large Ade- limited measure quately degree Not at all 4 : 6 7 149 9 ? 0.4 515 53.8 4 0.4 5? 8 G.2 aso 3 2 0.4 5 0.0 0.0 subjectmatter”’ ‘objective degree of who rated the thought the els did not rate each objective. Fo refer to the rank in attainment was ment of teachers as to the objective of greatest considerable lag between ideals importance placed Objective | (character) How extensive and serious this condi: first in the list. The composite judgment on be the present study did not attem this objective as to the adequacy of attainment cover. Perhaps the lag is more serious (column 3, “in large measure”; and col- 3 4 consumer education’ 60 percent thought for increased emphasi junior high-school level. Similarly interpret other check marks and asterisks. t { 203 ] t turther teachers agreed on the desirability « emphasis on eight topics: ‘Consumer education Facilities of social Investment and personal finance Vocational analysis and information Community analysis Personal analysis International relations Relation of industry and government intercourse Fifty percent or more (asterisks indicate 60 percent or more) of the senior high-school teachers agreed upon the following nine topics: *Consumer education *Facilities of social intercourse *Investment and personal finance *Adult education *Vocational analysis and information *Community analysis *Personal analysis Social effects of the rise of science International relations. It should be noted that five of these topics are found in the lists at all three levels. These topics are: consumer education, vocational analysis and information, community analysis, personal analysis, and international relations. The formation of public opinion is found only on the elementary-school list. Adult education (e.g., agencies and opportunities for) and the * For suggestions on the selection of content, grade placement, and similar problems consult The Sox Present practise and trends, p. 165-77; 1936 Yearbook, Department of Superintendence. 178-232; selection of content, p. 141-64; grade placement, p social effects of the rise of science are tw found only on the senior high-school |i junior high-school list overlaps both mentary and the senior high-school | contains no topic not found on one others. The outcome of this teachers is not presented as a guide to rating by cl cepted uncritically. In specific school and in individual judgment is at variance with Tables 5, schools, where con 7, the use of even the same procedure outlined might result in a listing of ite ferent from that in Table 8. Howeve: in these schools the procedure for obtair judgment of competent teachers and sults in the present case will be helpful placement of the sixteen areas, regarded Commission on the Social Studies C lum as generally inadequately emphasize have to be made largely on the basis o petent opinion. The success of such pla will be determined in large measure skilful use of methods, devices, and sup; tary materials. Adjustment of the plac of the topics will necessarily follow f: observed and tested outcomes. to method and instructional materials w found in the remaining sections of tl letin.* Suggest ial Studies ¢ 63-90; organization of and evaluation of outcomes, p. 312-43 program [ 204 ] III. Characteristics of Course-of-Study Bulletins Learning takes place in the classroom thru . interaction between the pupil, the teacher, 1d “the thing to be learned.” In most city school systems the third of these factors is described in some detail in so-called course-of study bulletins. Observation shows that these bulletins vary widely as to the general and specific nature of their contents, as to their emphasis upon pupil and social or group out- comes, and as to the rigidity of conformance expected of the teacher. Under what conditions in these matters are teachers of recognized ability expected to do their work? How would the preferences of these teachers change exist- ing practises? Upon these two questions the 1764 teachers in the present study were asked give their most careful judgments. General Analysis of Practise and Teachers’ Preferences Rigidity of requirements—Three degrees of prescription of the course of study were sub- mitted for the judgment of classroom teachers: rigid prescription of subjectmatter to be ght; (2) pre- scribed—freedom beyond this; and (3) gen- tau minimum or core content eral areas stated—specific details and topics left largely to the teacher. Each participant in the present investigation was asked to indicate the predominant nature of the present course- of-study bulletin now used in his teaching and then to indicate his preference. The results of these requests are shown by school levels in Table 9. } Twelve and four-tenths percent of all th teachers reported that rigid requirements ar¢ prescribed for them; but only 2 percent pre ferred to have their subjectmatte1 gidly prescribed. More than half the teachers pre ferred to have general areas stated with specific topics and details left to the teacher. There seemed to be little difference among teachet from different grade levels, except that mor teaching so Tl elementary teachers were under rigidly prescribed requirements, whereas greater freedom was given to teachers of older pupils. Size of city, tvpe of community, and social attitudes of teachers and parents had no apparent bearing upon the percent of teache: reporting averseness to rigid prescription of subjectmatter. In general, from 10 to 16 per cent of the teachers used bulletins rigidly pr scribing subjectmatter. General plan of course-of-study bulletins For the most part, the general plans of course of-study bulletins may be classified into three (1) brief lists of topics and pages in summary of and (3) elaborate treat types: textbooks; (2) information, ob jectives, and sources: ment of information, objectives, sources, meth ods, tests, and references. Teachers were asked to report the predominant characteristic of the bulletins they were using and then to indicate the type preferred. These data Table 10 by school levels. Nearly 25 that in actual practise they used the brief-out ) per cent, the summary type; and 19 percent, the are given percent of the teachers reported line type of course-of-study bulletin; 56.: TABLE 9.—PERCENT OF TEACHERS AT EACH SCHOOL LEVEL FOLLOWING AND PREFERRING DIFFERENT TYPES OF COURSE-OF-STUDY REQUIREMENTS Elementary school Requirements Prac- tise ence 2 3 Rigid subjectmatter to be taught Minimum or core content prescribed; free- dom beyond this General areas stated details left largely to teacher prescription ofl 43.5 and specific topics 40.5 100.0 100.0 Read table as follows: 16 percent of the elementary teachers gidly prescribed subjectmatter; only 1.8 percent preferred Prefer- Total all levels Senior high school Junior high school Prefer ence Prac- tise Prefer- ence Prac- tise Prefer ence Prac- tise 6 7 8 100.0 100.0 100 100_0 reported that pract pe of requirement FIGURE III COURSE-OF-STUDY REQUIREMENTS USED IN PRACTISE AND PREFERRED BY TEACHERS PERCENT 50 l ELEMENTARY Practise Preference JUNIOR HIGH Practise Preference SENIOR HIGH Practise Preference Rigid prescription yeneral areas stated Minimum or core content [J For details consult Table 9. Research Division, Nationa! Education Ass more elaborate plans. When preferences were given there was a definite shift in these per- cents. Only 6.3 percent of the total group pre- ferred the brief-outline type and 33.5 percent preferred the elaborate bulletins. The sum- mary plan was preferred by 60.2 percent. Only 10.3 percent of the elementary teachers reported a brief list of topics to be their prefer- ence, and this type of bulletin was even less popular among secondary teachers. The sum- mary type of bulletin is used more generally by senior high-school teachers ; elaborate treatment is less often used and also less popular at the senior high-school level than at the lower grade levels. ‘These facts should be of particular in terest to those responsible for the preparation of course-of-study bulletins. Specific form of bulletins—Proceeding from the general plan of course-of-study bulletins to the specific form of the content, certain pre- dominant types may be found: (1) topical out- line; (2) detailed narrative and descriptions ; (3) questions and answers; (4) problems; (5) projects, units, or activities. Upon these teachers reported their practise as to usag also their preferences. The results by levels are given in Table 11. It should be st that, altho combinations were not provid« in the inquiry form, the teachers wrote on their replies. In most instances thes S various combinations of (1), (4), and About four teachers in ten reported th bulletins in use are predominantly topic line in form. A similar proportion rey bulletins which consist chiefly of projects, and activities. On the basis of preference about one in ten selected the topical « form while six in ten preferred the p1 unit-activities type. At the various school certain differences in practise were ap} and, on the basis of preferences these diff ences were even more marked. A consid larger proportion of the elementary t preferred the project-unit-activity form o! letin than did secondary teachers. Also tively more senior high-school teachers ferred the topical outline than did teach [ 206 ] the elementary or junior high-school ing the type did not show tween types of communities P\ Aly [he project-unit-activities type of bulletin is sie ae : ‘ Individual and Socal CMPAA nore frequently used by elementary teachers ; ? aie : educators there are some who urge , cities over 100,000 population. ‘The topical Pine J h jun; matter emphasis in teaching; some advox tline tvpe increased in use among both junio : ; itline type a = . J ve primary attention to the individual’s need ey . . oh-sc - y : 1- and senior high-school teachers with de interest; others emphasize group or so if 4 reases in the size of city. Preference for the needs: and still others trv to attain a b type increased among between the individual and the soci? aspect Most course-of-study bulletins either by di or indirectly thru lists of desira be classified under one of project-unit-activities elementary teachers with increases in city size; preference for the problem type among sec- treatment f information, objec , sources, met! and refer 19 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 the present study 1 th enecral plan Read table as follows: 24.8 percent of all of the teachers in f topics and pages in textbooks; only 6.3 percent preferre TABLE 11.—PERCENT OF TEACHERS AT EACH SCHOOL LEVEL USING AND PREFERRING VARIOUS FORMS OF PRESENTATION IN COURSE-OF-STUDY BULLETINS Elementary Junior Senior Total all levels school high school high school Prefer- Prac- Prefer ence Specific form of bulletin Prefer- Prac- Prefer- Prac- Prac- tise ence tise tise ence ence tise Q 2 33 2 8 1. Topical outline 37.¢ 2, Detailed narrative and description 6.2 3. Questions and answers 2.9 1.0 y 4. Problems . 4.4 7 10.: 5. Projects, units, or activities 43.4 > 39 6. Combinations 5.6 3.8 11 ) 100.0 100.0 100 100 100.0 of the teachers reported that bulletin f bulletin ot Read table as follows: 37.9 percent of all into topical outlines; 12.1 percent of the total group preferred this erence is shown by school levels in Table 12. letins was about equal between social Combinations not specifically listed in the interests. About 30 percent believ: questionnaire were written in by the re- phasis was predominantiy or spondents. On the basis of preferences the vast At all school levels about 50 percent of the of the teachers chose the balanced s ! | natior teachers thought that the emphasis in the bul- emphasis. Subjectmatter di TABLE 12.—PERCENT OF TEACHERS AT EACH SCHOOL LEVEL REPOR?7 EMPHASIS PRACTISED AND PREFERRED IN COURSE-OF-STUDY BULLET! Elementary Junior Senior school high school high school Emphasis Prac- Prefer- Prac- Prefer- Prac- Prefe tise ence tise ence ence 1 2 ; r group) interests Pupil (or individual) interests 3. About equally—social and pupil interests Subjectmatter Combination of (1) and (4) . Combination of (3) and (4) Combination of (2) and (4) 100.0 { 100.0 100 100.0 100 100.0 Read table as follows: 31.6 percent of all of the teachers reported a subjectmatter emphasis i which they used in practise; 3.7 percent of the total group preferred a subjectmatter emphasis FIGURE IV EMPHASIS IN COURSE-OF-STUDY BULLETINS REPORTED AS PRACTISED AND PREFERRED BY TEACHERS PERCENT 5060 i 1 ELEMENTARY Practise Preference JUNIOR HIGH Practise Preference SENIOR HIGH Practise Preference Social- Subjectmett Baie Social Individual 3S Individual _} Combinat For details consult Table 12. Research Division, Nationa! Education Ass [ 208 ] table to only 3.7 percent of the entire group, the elementary teachers being most nearly mous in rejecting this emphasis. Elementary and junior high-school! teachers eported a decrease in use of subjectmatter popular amon emphasis with increase in city size. Senior high f this type. «chool teachers, however, did not indicate that f bulletins estions and jis was true of high-school courses of study. least liked by tl x such bulletins In all city-size groups relatively few of the bulletins characterized by problems and teachers preferred the subjectmatter emphasis. jects, units, or activities were preferred On other bases of classification important dif large majority of those using them ferences appeared. For example, bulletins em- courses of study organized around p sizing subjectmatter are less generally used were not verv widely used, 6 the problem type \merican-born communities than in foreign those using orn areas; less by teachers in wealthy com kind of bulletin. nunities than in the poorer districts. The Very tew tear he rs whose course of stu ly } hha marked desire of the teachers to move away phasizes subjectmatter preferred that emp from the subjectmatter emphasis should be of | whereas the type of bulletin which balances th irticular interest to curriculum committees. emphasis between individual and group acti ties was well liked by those who have used Relationship between Use and Preferences of Teachers Summary Further investigation into the preferences of \ review of the preceding sections sui that recognition of the preterences of t } teachers and the types of bulletins in use will result in more widespread use of courss showed that many teachers preferred a bulletin bulletins with the following ch form different from the one they were using. of-study Table 13 presents the evidence in support of _ teristics: this finding. Rigid prescription of subjectmat ; st ; aps ‘ : “ 1) Prescription of general areas but cor ter is preferred by less than 10 percent of those apie freedom for the teacher to determine spe 1 who use courses of study of this type; bulletins topics and details It must be remembered that these classifications of communities are based upon teachers’ opinions TABLE 13.—PERCENT OF TEACHERS USING CERTAIN TYPES OF COURSE OF STUDY AND PREFERRING TO USE SAME TYPE Elementary Junior Senior Type of course of study odiaad high school high school Requirements: 1. Rigid prescription of subjectmatter to be taught 2. Minimum or core content prescribed; freedom bey 3. General areas stated—specific topics and details to teacher General plan of bulletin: A. Brief list of topics and pages in textbook 2. Summary of information, objectives, and sources 3. Elaborate treatment of informatior methods, tests, and references Specific form of bulletin: 1. Topical outline 2. Detailed narrative and description 3. Questions and answers 4. Problems ae 5. Projects, units, or activities D. Emphasis: 1. Social (or group) interests 2. Pupil (or individual) interests 3. About equally—social and pupil interests 4. Subjectmatter obiecti 36 42.9 5.9 60.0 » oO Read table as follows: Of the elementary-schoo! this kind of requirement; of those using the ‘‘general (2) Detailed treatment of information, objectives, sources, methods, and other aspects of the curriculum (3) Specific suggestions as to problems, projects, units, and activities (4) Less emphasis upon subjectmatter as such and more upon a combination of social and pupil interests. For years there has been widespread ad- vocacy of the four preceding principles, par- fields of teacher training and curriculum development ticularly among authorities in the That a large proportion of the teache: in their preferences to these principles be encouraging to those interested in improvements in social studies prograr hiatus here revealed between teachers ences (which tend to be idealistic) and | is undoubtedly related to the lag noted ceding sections of the present bulleti: to improve course-of-study bulletins n take into account the methods and aids are discussed in the next section. ROGRESSIVE ADMINISTRATORS and teachers are coming to be lieve that the only way to prepare the oncoming generation to live success fully in a Democracy is to give them the opportunity to practice Democracy i: the classroom, and that teachers for their part cannot develop skill in cooperation successfully unless they, too, are members of a school system which operates democratically from top to bottom. With the great awakening in regard to the importance of emphasis upon the principles of democracy has arisen a desire to democratize education, to take the children into partnership (as some schools have already done), to create schools which shall be an integral part of the community life, in which children will face the future, deal with life problems, and learn to solve such problems democratically. All these new goals and functions mean that attention must be given to the development of skill in cooperation in the schools. Unfortunately the literature on cooperation is meager. New techniques must be invented and new methods of teaching them developed.— Teachers and Cooperation,” published by De- partment of Supervisors and Directors of Instruction, 1937. p. 2-3. IV. Methods and Aids in Teaching What methods are most frequently used by ; Reasons for not using outside agencies What are the reasons given by teachers for making little or no use of non-school agencies ? Five possible impediments or difficulties were listed on the inquiry form and space provided for additional reasons. Teachers were asked to mark the chief reason for not using non-school agencies. The replies on this question are at ranged by school level in Table 20. Reasons ri ported by less than 1 percent of all the teachers have been classified as miscellaneous. Specific items not printed on the inquiry blank are marked with asterisks. According to the replies of these teachers of (Table 20), the chief im pediment to regular contacts with local agencies ane recognized ability was a lack of time in the school schedule. Only 7.1 percent of the entire group were dubious as to the value of these contacts. The reason “disapproval of public and parents” (printed on the questionnaire) was checked by on/y two junior high-school teachers! Since the provision of time in the schedule for outside contacts is primarily an administrative problem the com posite opinion of these teachers puts the ques tion squarely up to school executives. If the use of outside resources is to increase, princi pals and superintendents will have to make the necessary adjustments in school schedules. *It must be remembered that these classifications of teachers and communities are based on teachers’ opinions [ 215 ] ] | TABLE 20.—REASONS GIVEN BY SO- CIAL STUDIES TEACHERS FOR NOT MAKING EXTENSIVE USE OF OUT- SIDE AGENCIES Percent of 402 469 1206 Junior Senior Teach- Reasons high- high- ers school school at all teach- teach- school ers ers levels 1 3 Lack of time in school s hed- ule Teachers’ doubt as to their usefulness in social studies instruction Lack of transportation facil- ities . Disapproval by administra- tive and supervisory officers Unwillingness of these agen- cies to cooperate.... *Size of classes and number of classes to be taken *Combinations of two or more reasons printed in question- naire , *Miscellaneous Total percent giving reasons . 100 100.0 100.0 100.0 Read table as follows: Of the 1764 teachers participating in the study, 1206 gave reasons why they established few or no regular contacts with local agencies. Over 72 percent of the 1206 teachers reported the chief reason as lack of time in the school schedule. Only 7.1 percent felt that these contacts were of doubtful value in social studies instruction. The data revealed that teachers of recog- nized ability in the large cities were more likely to doubt the value of contacts than those in the small towns. There appeared to be less likeli- hood of administrative disapproval in large cities than in cities of population under 30,000. It was reported that agencies in large cities are more likely not to cooperate than those in towns under 10,000. Transportation facilities are more of a problem in the large cities than in the small towns where distances are not so great. Lack of social agencies was not re- ported as a problem in the larger cities and towns, but below 10,000 population a few teachers reported this as a reason for not making the contacts. These differences suggest that school executives in the large cities have more difficulties to overcome in making first-hand contacts available to the pupils of their schools. Can transportation problems be overcome by the use of chartered and bonded buses? Could the service clubs be enlisted in opening stores and factories to visits by pupils? Car ing community agencies be discovered 1 each school ? Needs of Teachers Often an excellent method of in hampered by factors such as a lack of tional materials, inadequate supervisior course-of-study requirements, large cla brief classroom periods. What assista teachers of recognized ability think wou them to do better teaching? Fourtee: were listed on the questionnaire and sp TABLE 21—PERCENT OF SO STUDIES TEACHERS REPOR!’ NEEDS WHICH WOULD IMPRO INSTRUCTION 548 Ele 562 654 men- Junior Senior tary- high- high- Need or change school school school teach- teach- teach ers ers ers 1 2 3 . Smaller classes . Longer periods More reference books . Auditory and visual aids . More bulletins and leaflets on social problems Improved textbooks. . More magazines . More newspapers - More equipment (e.g., maps) on . Improved library facilities o BeRte... . More opportunity to take class on excursions. .. . Freedom from present course requirements. . . . More definitely formu- lated courses . Better coordination of subjectmatter thru grades . Opportunity to observe other teachers aes . More guidance from su- pervisors es, See . Advice from principal... . . Time for preparation, con- ferences... ieee 20. Time and money for travel and study..... 21. Less clerical and extra- class work 0 *22. Miscellaneous 3 2 2.3 Read table as follows: Of the 1764 teachers partic the study, 57.4 percent thought that one of the great in the improvement of their instruction would be classes; 59.8 percent thought instruction could be imp more reference books. Asterisks indicate items not pr the questionnaire [ 216] ded for additional statement of needs hose marked with asterisks were not printed the questionnaire. lable 21 shows the percent of the entire p of teachers and of those at each grad | mentioning various needs. It should be 7 noted that items (1) and (2) are primarily ad ministrative problems; (3) thru (11), matters of improving the quantity and quality of in structional materials; (12) thru (15), items having to do with the course of study; and 16) thru (21), items essentially supervisory in nature. The need for “more reference books”’ is the Next in fre “auditory one most frequently reported. quency were “smaller classes” and ind visual aids.”’ These three needs were re ported by nearly three teachers out of five. Other outstanding wishes expressed by the teachers are for more bulletins dealing with social problems, opportunity for more excur- sions, More magazines, improved textbooks, and opportunity to observe the teaching in othe classrooms. Apparently elementary teachers of recog nized ability, more than senior high-school teachers, felt the need for more reference books ind better textbooks. More elementary-school teachers also expressed a desire for freedom requirements. from course-of-study There was a suggestion, altho the percents were present small, that clerical and extra-class duties intet fered more with classroom instruction on the senior high-school level than in elementary schools. When these data were arranged by estimates of the economic levei of the communities, the poor districts were shown to have consistently inadequate Reference books, magazines, newspapers, excursions, and teaching conditions. auditory and visual aids were reported as needed with one-third to one-half greater fre quency in poor districts as compared with well- to-do communities. Classes also appeared to be larger in the “‘poor’’ districts, and course-of- study requirements more burdensome 3 See footnote 1 in this section Also, Wesley, Edgar B. Tea Summary section has not deen cons lhe present weaknesses of with the strengths and methods and aids in social studies inst: [hese questions have been discussed the inqu the technics and publications. purpose of been to discove I quently used by city teachers of ability, the reasons for not using lo« and the points at which social studies teacl believe that they require help. On the topic « ie 1 . several self-evaluation d To! section teachers and For teachers | opyecti general moved 1) Is it possible that the social studies instruction have ahead past few years while my methods have r« relatively stati 2) Is my teaching characterized by almos clusive use of one or possibly two methods j S jual (3) Do I adjust my instructional procedur t ciously to the implications of research and tested practise or am I merely trying to be fashion educationally 4) Am I attempting to keep the minds bodies of my students confined within the fo of the classroom thereby overlooking the avai resources in non-school agencies? 5) Have quacies of my le I been active in eliminating the ina } instructional environment by confer ences with supervisory officers, by establishing con tacts with non-school groups, by collecting free and inexpensive instructional materials, and by develop ing in pupils the maximum responsibility for self direction ? For administrators 1) Have teachers participated in the preparation of the schedule of classes so as to introduce the ele ment of instructional as well as administrative ef ficiency ? (2) Could funds now used for other purposes be used for more and better instructional materials, the improvement of library facilities, visual aids, and other means for enriching instruction ? (3) Have I been willing to make the administra tive adjustments and provide the facilities for trips excursions, and contacts with resources outside of the school ? (4) What effort have I with the teachers under my supervision to discover made thru conferences the extent and the nature of the instructional prob lems suggested by the foregoing section ? t the Social Studies. New York: D. C. Heath and Co., 1937 V. Dealing with Controversial Subjects Altho closely allied with general methods Controversial Topics Avoided Enti: and aids discussed in the preceding section, the or Treated with Special Tact problem of dealing with controversial subjects is of such importance as to require detailed 1 Since the topics listed by some tea treatment.' The purposes of this phase of the avoided entirely aie pagnnnen oy present study may be suggested by the five ques- merely requiring tactful treatment, the tions included in the questionnaire. What ‘°° these two questions are considered to; controversial topics do teachers of recognized It is interesting to note that of the entire ability think they must avoid entirely? What of 1764 teachers, 63 percent * thought are the chief reasons why these topics must be controversial topics did not have to be ay excluded from the classroom? What topics entirely. Fifty-seven percent of the elem« must be treated with special tact? Specifically, teachers, 62 percent of the junior high-s how does one treat a controversial issue with teachers, and 70 percent of the high-s tact? Do school systems have rules forbidding teachers reported no controversial issues w all discussion of controversial questions ? needed to be avoided. Only 1.3 percent 1 For a summary of studies on the teaching of controversial topics consult Ernest Horn’s Methods of Instruction in th Studies, Part XV of the report of the Commission on the Social Studies, American Historical Association; published by Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1937. p. 87-96. For the general question of ‘“‘What and How To Think the same ref¢ 79-121 2In The Social Studies Curriculum (1936 Yearbook, Department of Superintendence, p. 303) porting that controversial issues did not have to be avoided were: 67.2, senior high schools; 64.2, junior junior high schools; 44.5, eight-year elementary schools; 23.2, six-year elementary schools. The exter two studies is rather significant. TABLE 22.—RANK ORDER OF FREQUENCY OF MENTION OF ISSUES AVOID! AND TACTFULLY HANDLED Elementary school Junior high school Senior high scl Tactfully Tactfully Tactf Type of issue Avoided handled Avoided handled Avoided han 6 SO ee eee Politics—general... . » Sem questions. ......0.6:: . Social legislation and reform 5 ND IDS os oben nccescc . Communism - Racial problems : . Policies and practises of national government..... . Criticism of prominent people I a ec pipe c ee aereeenerass . Class distinctions . School problems and policies . Policies and practises of state and local government . Social customs and attitudes 5. General theories of economics and government . Socialism . Nationalities . Organizations and their influence . Consumer education . International relations . Public control or ownership of industry 22. Policies in commerce or business . War and peace 14 . Fascism tas 18 . 25.5 15.5 CSenNAU es wh = Ne - — NK BDRDASCASU®eWrne 10 12 21 23 21 —_ ~ uN 25.5 25.5 Nw 2nnun a © > . State politics . Civil war... Heaene oe . War involving the U. S. and foreign countries. .. . Naziism wNNN < 16.5 25! 18.5 21 21.5 N NNER eee LD ° ~ = < w — Read table as follows: Among the senior high-school teachers reporting issues as avoided entirely religion were reported most frequently and therefore this area is ranked first. This area was also most frequently reported the subjects dealt with tactfully. y questions having to d [ 218 ] ported that local rules prohibited consideration f all controversial topics. The nature of these mitations will be discussed later in the present section. Twenty-five types of issues and their rank n order of frequency of mention at the senior high-school level 6) lable 22. In many instances, the teachers (column are shown in listed specific topics rather than the general :reas given in the table. For example, strikes, lockouts, picketing, and similar questions have been tabulated under the general heading of labor problems. Comparison of columns 2 thru 7 of Table 22 indicates that issues most frequently reported as needing to be avoided were also reported to be in need of special treatment. In a few cases only were issues ranking high in the “to be woided” list less frequently mentioned in the list of issues requiring tact. Sex questions at the senior high-school level is an area which exemplifies this difference. This type of issue s third in column 6 and tenth in column 7. Obviously, the emphasis on this type of issue has been toward avoidance. Labor problems, ranking tenth in the list of issues to be avoided, is ranked fourth in the list of issues to be treated with tact. In this case, the emphasis has been toward tactful treatment rather than avoid ance. The evidence seems to show that regardless of the background of the teacher, the com- munity, or pupils, certain issues are more ot less perilous. On every basis of classification of the replies controversial religious topics were most frequently mentioned. Politics was the issue second in rank order of frequency of men TABLE 23.—PERCENT OF TEACHERS AT EACH LEVEL tion both on the ‘ iwoidance”’ and the ‘‘tact handled”’ lists. In of teacher, size of both lists neithe1 orade community, type of c munity by several measures, nor attitude parents and teachers affected the relative po Table 22. We these seven issues factors wh cil arouse highly emotionalized partisanship tion of the first seven issues in that debatable } 1 may conclude, then, particularly involve A different sort of picture of the relation ship between controversial topics and the school levels is shown in Table 23, which presents the proportion of teachers in each group reporting that the issues must be avoided or handled tact fully. In this connection, each issue should be examined separately with regard to the number: of teachers listed at the top of columns 2 thru The first issue mentioned is religion. A larger proportion of elementary teachers reported that issues were QvVOlde controversial religious whereas a larger proportion of senior high school teachers reported that debatable reli; ous topics were treated with special tact. The economic background of the commut affects controversial topics as shown by the fact that teachers reporting their communities to be “well oft” did not ligious issues as frequently, proportionately, mention the difhiculty of re did teachers in communities rated to be o lower economic level. Teachers in communities with reactionary and radical parents more often avoided controversial religious issues than thos« having conservative and liberal patrons, while the latter more often reported that religious questions needed to be treated tactfully than did the teachers in reactionary and radical com munities. With regard to political issues, these REPORTING CERTAIN ISSUES AVOIDED OR HANDLED TACTFULLY 548 Elementary-school teachers Type of issue Handled Avoided tactfully 3 . Religion. . . 34.; 25 - Politics... .. : : 18.3 3. Sex questions : 8.§ 3 . Race problems ‘ 13 5, Communism . Local politics . Social legislation and reform Junior high-school teachers Avoided 654 Senior high-school teachers 562 Entire group Handled tactfully Handled tactfully Handled tactfully Avoided Avoided 5 6 7 8 32 y 35.8 29 7 25.1 1 7.5 16. 4 2 ee 13.3 ) 21.4 8 8.7 g 5 7 11 1 Read table as follows: Of the 548 elementary-school teachers, 34.3 percent reported that they avoided religi: percent reported that they handled these topics with special tact 40.3 percent did not mention issues in this area [ 219 ] same findings hold, except that teachers who reported “reactionary parents’ more often avoided the problems than teachers reporting their communities to be conservative, liberal, or radical. ‘The differences suggested by these composite opinions clearly indicate that social studies instruction does not take place in a vacuum. Teachers must be familiar with the opinions and prejudices of the communities in which their pupils live. While certain issues are particularly difficult to handle, wise class- room procedure may win public approval of instruction even on most controversial topics. Considering the issues most frequently men tioned by the entire group of 1764 teachers, we find that religious issues were avoided by 26.8 percent and treated tactfully by 31.6 percent. The next most frequently mentioned area is that of politics which was avoided by only 13.5 percent and treated tactfully by 23.8 percent. The other issues included in Table 23 were the most frequently mentioned issues, yet a very small percent of the teachers reported them. This would indicate that altho the issues ranked in Table 23 assume those relative positions ac- cording to rank order of frequency of mention, religious issues and politics are apparently the areas of the greatest general controversy. Reasons Given for Avoiding Controversial Topics Why do teachers of recognized ability avoid controversial subjects in their classrooms? Is it because they think that the discussion of cer- 8 For evidence concerning this fear of pressure groups, New York, 1936, 855 p.; Bessie L Sons, 1933, 426 p.; *On this point compare with Frederick H to Education, No. 625, Teachers College, Columbia University, Sons, consult Pierce’s Citizens’ Organizations and the Civic and Bruce Raup’s Education and Organized Interests in America, G. P. Putnam’s Son Bair’s The Social Understandings of the Superintendent o/ 1934, p tain topics will bring reprisals from groups? Is it because of local board cluding controversial subjects from class Teachers were asked in the present select a specific topic usually avoided indicate the primary reason for exclud from their classrooms. Reasons given for avoiding controve) jects—Seven possible reasons were id on the questionnaire. Altho space was pri for additional items, few were written few cases teachers gave two or three reas stead of the primary reason as requested. 650 teachers reported various issues as entirely, only 409 gave reasons for so ason are The proportions citing each re Table 24. Table 24 shows that the reason cited frequently for avoiding controversial was “fear of outside pressure groups.’ reason was most frequently given at the high-school level. Immaturity of the pup the reason given the greatest number of by elementary-school teachers. Disapproy parents apparently is a stronger deterr the elementary school than it is at the school levels. Relatively few teachers rep: that they avoided controversial topics be of proscriptions by principals, superintend or schoolboards. Local rules forbidding consideration controversial topics—Of the 1764 tea only 1.3 percent reported the existence of Charles § Charles New York, 19 Schools, Cont Howard K. Beale’s Are Teachers Free? Training of } ‘th, 44-45. Ninety-eight percent of the superinte schools answered affirmatively the question: “Do you think the public schools ought to deal with such [controversial] q TABLE 24.—PERCENT OF TEACHERS CITING CERTAIN REASONS FOR AVOI! ING CONTROVERSIAL TOPICS Total ° number of == +--+ School level teachers Forbidden Forbidden giving by by super- reasons principal intendent 2 3 4 153 4! 9.2 127 $.! 13.4 129 4 Elementary Junior high Senior high 11.2 Total 409 4.9 Read table as follows: the reason ‘‘fear of outside pressure groups”’; Of the 409 teachers giving reasons for avoiding various controversial subjects, 42.5 percent re 61.2 percent of the 129 senior high-school teachers cited this reason. Percent giving each reason Disap- proval of parents Forbidden by school- board Fear side | Lack of maturity of pupils sure gr Forbidden by law 7 31.4 24.4 20.9 25.9 [ 220 ] ['abulations on the basis of school level ir .d that elementary-school teachers taught often under prohibitory rules than seni h-school teachers. When ved the data indicated that t large arran DY Cl he more likely to have rules than the sma P ee cities.” A few teachers commented that ther was no written rule, but a general understand based upon the superintendent’s warning. [hat these cases could not be very many is shown by Table 24 where only 11.2 .2 percent of the teachers mentioned a superintendent’s « ruling against specific controversial topics. Examples of local rules excluding contro versial topics from the schools are the follow ing: No denomi national publication of any kind whatever shall be of library, nor shall any denominational or sectarian doctrines be inculcated. (Population 30,000-100,000) Sectarian publications: sectarian or used in the schools or made a part any school Teachers must carefully guard against the intro duction of all questions of a sectarian, partisan, or controversial character. (Population over 100,000) All questions of a sectarian or partisan character shall be carefully excluded from the schools. (Popu- lation over 100,000) All teachers shall carefully guard against the in troduction of questions of sectarian or partisan po- litical nature into their citizens and have the citizen’s right to form and ex- press opinions. But the schools must not be used for propaganda purposes. (Population over 100,000) instruction. Teachers are The superintendent and teachers shall prevent the introduction or within the of questions of a sectarian nature or of a political char- acter that may become partisan. Only such books shall be used by teachers for class or reference work as are approved by the superintendent or the board of education. There shall not be any teaching in the schools which tends discussion, school, to impair the pupil’s respect for and confidence in our government. (Population 10,000-30,000) In addition to local rules against the con- sideration of controversial topics there are the limitations imposed by general state law and by special laws requiring oaths of teachers. In thirty states the constitutions or statutory laws prohibit sectarian teaching. It is probable that in most instances these laws were designed to safeguard the right of freedom of religion. Teacher oath prescriptions range all the way trom simple promises to fulfil the duties of 5 A similar finding was reported by the American Institute of Public Opinion isms” was 63 percent; in the ten largest cities, 58 percent ® The texts of the oaths now required of teachers will be Division of the National Education Association found in Tea 221 rt S| ofhce tal te icher’s th Deal Controversial Subjects How Teachers with How do lly with controvers! s } yy] 1 as) LOWITY Geal on the otf Space was 1ded INqUITY statements. nun I illust itions level will be given, After each illust: given parenthetically the teacher’s descr ot as examp!| ce ich schor )| the methods re ported. the na and himself community in w teaches. 1? . , ) ’ 4 btions of procedure al the ele De seri tl school level sider the teaching of controversial issues on the level as difficult the secondary level because of the simplicity of ”) Apparently teachers do not con elementary a problem as on the curriculum content and the immaturity of the pupils. According to the reports, elementary teachers aim to present all sides impartially and remain neutral but give simplified explanations of issues as they arise. Pupils are usually taught tolerance of others’ views, broadmindednes fairness, and independent thinking. In the upper elementary grades such questions may arise as ] religious, racial, and national prejudices, and issues of personal social relations. Pupils are likely to express the opinions learned at home has a difficult teacl The teacher task in teaching tolerance to pupils in spite of their family’s prejudices without gaining the ill-will of the For ot think, a few quotations are given with reference parents. illustrations what teacher to several of the major issues. Religion—Introduce_ religion as a worldwide thing. ship, mythology, etc. Show its beginnings, paganism, family wor de veloped as civilization came. Simply mention var Show how Christianity ious kinds of religion existing and speak as if they are all beneficial to persons involved. Show that religion is mostly an influence which comes in the upbringing of the person and that many hay definite belief but are still worthwhile people ported by a conservative teacher in a liberal munity of population between 2,500 and 5,000 community is predominantly foreign-born and busi ness type, in comfortable circumstances. ) Religion—Biography of Martin Luther, emphasiz ] ing his boyhood days in his father’s home, early g In small towns, the vote in fa hers meographed report ] days, singing on the streets; life in the (omitting any criticism of the priests) ; S( hool monastery particular emphasis on the Aeroism of his stand at Worms (omitting all partisan references) ; his valuable contribution of the German transla- tion of the Bible. (Reported by a teacher in a conservative community of population between 5,000 and 10,000. The community is pre dominantly American-born, of factory type, in com- very conservative fortable circumstances. ) Religion—The word Catholic is explained as meaning universal. All Christians were Catholic for many years. Gradually, a group disagreeing with certain beliefs of the Catholics and led by Martin excom- protesters were Luther and Luther, protested. These municated they followed started the Protestant religion. This new group set about to reform the Catholic beliefs to suit their ideas and thus the movement became known as the Reformation. Some men within the Protestant group soon disagreed and broke away from Luther and started a new sect, making the changes they believed were needed. Thus, the Protestant group has many sects. (Reported by a liberal teacher in a liberal community of population over 100,000. The com- munity is predominantly American-born, residen- tial, in comfortable circumstances. ) when thus Labor problems—Begin by showing differences in industrial activities in North and South, the strug- gle between East and West during the westward movement. Show dire results of lack of arbitration in 1863, 1861, and 1865. Class works out adjust- ments made by East and West. Discuss the financial obligations of mill owners such as overhead, wages, markets, foreign competition, safety devices, etc. The workers’ problems such as health, living, and needs are discussed. I lead the class away from di- rect controversial issues in the locality as hosiery and textile industry are directly affected. (Reported by a liberal teacher in a liberal community of popu- lation between 2,500 and 5,000. The community is predominantly American-born and residential type, of high economic level.) Labor problems—All work is honorable; service to others. Men and women must be trained and fitted to the work they choose, otherwise the worker cannot be contented and happy. As schools have superin- tendents and grade one has reporters and leaders, manufacturing plants and stores have different duties for differently trained workers and people to keep all departments working together. (Reported by a conservative teacher in a conservative com- munity of population between 5,000 and 10,000. The community is predominantly American-born, of factory type, in rather poor circumstances. ) Modern health rules—Interesting and convincing materials chosen for showing children. Assimilative materials arranged so as to include posters, graphs, and charts, which they can take into the home. Parents are interested by inviting them to programs in which the new ideas are made reasonable and at- tractive. (Reported by a conservative teacher in a conservative community of population between 5,000 and 10,000. The community is predominantly Ameri- | can-born, factory type, in comfortable stances. ) Family relations—Gain confidence of pupi pathize with their problems; confer with make whatever adjustments are possible in follow-up of cases giving children moral sx (Reported by a liberal teacher in a radix munity of population over 100 he con is predominantly American-born, factory t rather poor circumstances. ) Evolution—Many times no discussion aris casionally some child asks “Does that mean cestors were monkeys?” (or some similar que or a child goes home with Van Loon’s Hist Mankind and returns stating that mother sa was evolution and he couldn’t read it. We the: quite frankly that it is evolution, but that ey simply means change. We are constantly cha to fit our environment and our ancestors d same. Better brains made strong muscles less sary, etc. (Reported by a conservative teach« liberal community of population between 30, 100,000. The community is predominantly Am: born, residential type, in comfortable circumst Evolution—I never let pupils know my o; We never draw any conclusions. We read creation in the scriptures, in other stories of tion. But all are read as stories and not as (Reported by a conservative teacher in a cons tive community of population over 100,000. The munity is predominantly American-born, resid type, in rather poor circumstances. ) Fascism—There are often children whose | are great admirers of Mussolini and Hitler. 7 children are always given a chance to ex their point of view and give their reasons sides of the question are discussed. Class end coming to conclusion that they prefer to live democratic country and that we should strive to our country such so that it will not be necessa resort to a dictatorship. Children are always a to express any opinion, but quietly and calmly ported by a liberal teacher in a conservative « munity of population between 30,000 and 1' The community is predominantly residential type, in comfortable circumstances American Descriptions of procedure at the junior hi school level—At this level, a few teachers n general comments to the effect that contri sial issues are not so pertinent at the ju high-school level because they are not rele) to certain subjects like geography and naturally omitted from other subjects be« of the immaturity of the pupils. Since the n frequently described issue is politics, a few illustrations are given of how the junior hi school teachers handle these problems. Politics—We study the history of each pa Try to pick out the good and weak points in « We study how machine-like they are and how « trolled by political bosses. In conclusion the « ] ese ress soth shows how much alike the two major parties really »re and that much of the campaign literature was an sttempt to ruin the reputation of their opponents Reperted by a conservative teacher in a liberal community of population between 2,500 and 5,000. [he community is predominantly American-born, factory type, in comfortable circumstances.) Politics—Platforms are discussed and bad ones touched only lightly. Good points of both major can jidates are mentioned. Ballots are made. Instruc- tion given in straight and split tickets. Straw votes with returns posted hourly. Each votes as he likes. Reported by liberal teacher in a liberal community of population between 10,000 and 30,000. The com munity is predominantly American-born, residential type, in comfortable circumstances. ) Politics—Pupils give opinions regarding parties and issues. They list parents’ opinions. Project is as- signed to find names of officials. Local government and relation to child’s life are stressed. Speeches by city officials. Class visits city court, police and fire departments. Class discussion on qualities needed in politicians and wherein our city could be im- proved. Personal references are avoided. (Reported by a liberal teacher in a conservative community of population between 10,000 and 30,000. The com munity is predominantly American-born, residential type, in comfortable circumstances. ) Politics newspapers that have different political opinions. Study an issue that is current. Study Study identical issues in each. Use clippings for notebooks which illustrate contrasts in point of view. Pupils comment. Study articles to distinguish be tween fact and propaganda. Study the history of parties and issues. (Reported by a liberal teacher, in a community which the teacher rates as indiffer ent to social issues. The community has a population over 100,000, is predominantly American-born, fac tory type, in poor circumstances. ) To give a more complete picture of the treat ment of controversial issues at the junior high school level, illustrative comments are given below for a few varied issues: Comparative government—Study by definition only of kinds and systems of governments in the world. Identification of each system with country as example. Statement of fundamental aims of each system of government. Causes for rise of these types in a country: (1) stress economic conditions of peo ple, (2) importance of minority parties. Compari son and contrast of features in systems. Each pupil draws own conclusion on basis of comparison. (Re ported by a liberal teacher in a conservative com- munity of population between 30,000 and 100,000 lhe community is predominantly foreign-born, fac- tory type, and in rather poor circumstances.) Labor unions—Good and weak points of each type of labor union. Neutral attitude maintained. En- couraging each pupil to secure sufficient information upon which to base an individual tentative decision. Avoid class conclusions. Develop an attitude of open- mindedness. (Reported by a conservative teacher in [ 223 a conservative community of population between 30,000 and 100,000. The community is predominantly foreign-born, residential type, in comfortab cil cumstances Nationalities—Representatives of various natior ality groups in classes. Desire to foster a democrat spirit among mixed groups. Discuss contributions of each nation to civilization. Reasons for variety of peoples in United States. Desirable traits and merits of each group in this country. How various people have been fitted into American ways and become worthy citizens of our nation. Realization of the value of good fellowship thruout the world or the brotherhood of man. (Reported by a liberal teacher in a liberal community of population between 30,000 and 100,000. The American-born, residential type, in comfortable cir- community is predominantly cumstances. Religion—In general way discuss how it happens each of us goes to a particular church—usually find it is because we were born in a certain house, a thing over which we had no control. From this point develop a spirit of tolerance, emphasizing that we all live together, must do so, and ought to get along with little or no prejudices. Then go back to his torical development of religion (specific) tracing thru various splits down to present time, emphasiz ing similarities rather than differences. (Reported by a liberal teacher in a liberal community of popu lation between 30,000 and 100,000. The community is predominantly American-born, factory type, in poor circumstances Descriptions of procedure at the senior high S¢ hool level ers, many reported on methods of handling con Of the senior high school teach troversial issues pertaining to comparative gov ernment, socialism, and communism. Since this topic was one of the most often described issues for tactful discussion at senior high-school level it will be illustrated by several of the teachers’ descriptions. Communism—Reading of newspaper and maga zine items of each form; brief, explanation; com parison with democracy, pointing out the superi ority of democracy. Light discussion. (Reported conservative teacher in conservative community population 2,500 to 5,000. The community is pre dominantly foreign-born, factory type, in poor ci: cumstances. ) Comparative government—Summary of class opinion and understanding; much reading; parallel outlines on communism, fascism, and democracy Parallel outline on various types of socialism. Dis cussion of original erroneous ideas. Discussion of influences which must follow any accepted facts and principles. (Reported by liberal teacher in a con servative community of population between 2,500 and 5,000. The community is predominantly foreign born, residential type, in comfortable circumstances Communism—Need for knowledge of all forms of government. Purpose of knowledge is not indoc trination. Reports on current articles, pro and con. Discussion of all articles from author’s viewpoint. Comparison of communism with other types of gov- ernment. Weaknesses and strengths in all govern- ments. These are applied to American society and government. All personal animosities and favorit- isms are excluded from discussions. Students draw their own conclusions based on facts. (Reported by liberal teacher in conservative community of 5,000 to 10,000 population. The community is predomi- nantly American-born, factory type, in comfortable circumstances. ) Communism—Cause of the philosophy. Absence of conditions in United States which foster this philosophy. Comparison of communism and democ- racy as to (a) participation of the individual; (b) wage scales and standards of living; (c) social and moral conditions. The purpose or aim of government is health and happiness. Can best be achieved by education and self-direction. (Reported by conserva- tive teacher in conservative community of population 5,000 to 10,000. The community is predominantly American-born, residential type, in comfortable circumstances. ) Socialism—The origin, growth, and aims of socialism are treated under the topic of Third Party Movements along with other parties. A chart is used giving differences and similarities of various types of government. Questions are answered as im- partially as possible. (Reported by liberal teacher in liberal community of population 10,000 to 30,000. The community is predominantly American-born, residential type, in comfortable circumstances. ) Communism—I strictly follow the analysis of communism as outlined by the November 23, 1936, issue of the American Observer. If any word, phrase, or paragraph is not clear, I explain it as well as I can. Then, of course, I ask questions, and a general discussion follows. In the course of the discussion, we generally discover whether or not the arguments in favor of communism are sound. If one or two of them are sound, we make no pretense by way of denial. In conclusion, we say that the only way we can overcome communism is by offering society a better system of capitalism. (Reported by a liberal teacher in a conservative community of population between 10,000 and 30,000. The community is pre- dominantly foreign-born, residential type, in com- fortable circumstances. ) Communism—The good and bad ideas in com- munism and methods for obtaining a communistic state. Criticisms pro and con. Discussion of how good ideas can be secured by other methods. No out- side speakers or news item in school paper, no de- bates or programs or anything to work up emotion. (Reported by a liberal teacher in a conservative community of population between 30,000 and 100,- 000. The community is predominantly American- born, business type, in comfortable circumstances. ) Communism—Allowed to develop naturally out of major problems of better production and distri- bution of goods. Avoids sensationalism by naming it one of several solutions. Students evaluate capital- ism and present their own plans for reform. Au- [ 224 ] thoritative sources used by stud socialism. Teacher guides investig and organization. Critical discussion fo sides of issue. Students are then guided major problem and discuss better product distribution of goods. (Reported by a liberal! in a conservative community of population and 100,000. The nantly American-born, factory type, in con 30,000 community is circumstances. ) Comparative government—We use book phlets, pictures. We are particular about pr: both sides of the question. As a teacher I 1 neutral and I also tell the class | l sides in any discussion nor shall I attempt to « their ideas on the subject. This announcems made for this subjéct alone, but is one I shal use for any question in order to prevent a pro shal ment of fact or conclusion. The question thus remains open to continued discussion. (Report a liberal teacher in a liberal community of tion over 100,000. The community is predom foreign-born, residential type, in comforta cumstances. ) Analysis of teachers’ procedures—Fro reading of several hundred descriptions of cedure given by the teachers, it appeared certain common practises existed. First, the vailing method appeared to be discussion signed primarily to bring out facts and of view rather than to reach final cone Second, the teachers were interested in de ing certain attitudes in pupils: (1) self-ex nation for the purpose of recognizing preju as prejudices; (2) objective and impe: view of facts; and (3) appreciation of the : of others to different opinions. In fifty-seven descriptions of how high-school teachers handled political ques: the teachers placed particular emphasis eleven specific practises. Arranged in des ing order, with frequency of mention right, these practises were : ] Lu Both sides treated impartially (31) Discussion unrestricted (15) Polls and straw votes on election day (1| Tolerance of others’ views emphasized (7 Teachers do not give views (6) Conclusions avoided in class (6) Miniature campaign before election day (¢ Indoctrination avoided (6) Discussion kept neutral (4) Discussion restricted (2) Conclusions reached in class (2) On two points there was some disagreen (1) discussion was not restricted by fit teachers and restricted by two: and (2 clusions were not reached in class, acco! +) six teachers, but considered a part of the in tion by two teachers. In descriptions of how seventy-seven senior h-school teachers presented issues pertaining comparative government, the teachers re vealed fourteen specific practises. “These prac rises and their frequency of mention were as lows: Comparisons with the United States included (28 \ll] sides given impartially (22) Indoctrination for democracy (19) Pupils draw own conclusions outside of class (11 Weaknesses of democracy discussed (10) Discussion restricted (9) attitude (7) Weaknesses of democracy not discussed (6) t Scientific stressed Tolerance of views emphasized (6) Teachers’ personal opinions not expressed (5) (4) Conclusions reached in class Discussion not restricted (4) ntly Pupils urged to suspend judgment (3) ( [eacher’s opinion expressed, but minimized (1 Apparent differences in practises appear at three points: (1) ten teachers include a discus- pro sion of the weaknesses of democracy, but six that avoid this phase; (2) nine restrict discussion pre and four allow free discussion; and (3) five de- teachers avoid giving their personal views and one expresses his but does not emphasize them. ons. Controversial Subjects as an Integral mi- Part of the Social Studies Ices ~ ° ° ° Why must controversial topics be considered Mal ; ° . . . rn . ve in social studies instruction? The first most igh : ; , obvious answer is found in the nature of the . social studies themselves. As stated in the 1936 nLio , P . ‘ Yearbook of the Department of Superinten- ions dence: on nd- Now a true picture of communities, states, the a nation, and the world shows many facts beyond dis pute, many opinions held by different persons and groups, and frequent clashes of opinions and inter Hence we are compelled to bring into any true picture of a community or nation, facts, opinions, differences of opinion, and methods em ployed in settling differences of opinion. Not only do the social studies deal with debatable questions; they also deal with changing issues. This element of change involves emerging questions and Department 1936. p. 57-60 7 National Education Association, Washington, D. C.: the Department, 8 Philadelphia Inquirer America Speaks.’’ * National Council for the Social Studies (a department of ganda. Seventh Yearbook. Cambridge, Mass.: the Council ss 1937. 182 p (Sec of Superintendence Philadelphia Inq1 problems. The social studies, if ilistic tion, cannot be confined to reciting past ises traditions, and events. They must come to grips with new things.’ In the second place, many laymen recoyvnize controversial subjects as a necessary part of social studies instruction. This statement is sup ported by a nationwide survey made in 1936 by the American Institute of Public Opinion.® of study were in favor of discussing those canvassed by the | all the public schools. Similar results were obtained Sixty-two percent “isms” in 1936 by a poll of the members of the Com monwealth Club of California, a statewide as of tial forum for the discussion of disputed questions. sociation men organized as an impat The vote on three questions Was as follows: (1) Do you believe that there should be free and open discussion in the classroom on ai// controversial issues? Y es, 85.5 percent; No, 14.5 percent (2) public issues is essential Do you believe that discussion of all sides of for education of youth in democracy? Yes, 92.0 percent; No, 8.0 percent 3) Do you believe that teachers as a group can be relied upon to support the principle of demos racy? Yes, 93.5 percent; No, 6.5 percent. The club the of whether or not teachers should express thei: also voted on questions personal opinions and whether or not teachers should advocate one side of a debatable issue. On the first question the members were about equally divided but inclined slightly to the ex Ninety opposed the idea of advocacy as presented by pression of teacher opinion. percent the second question. The conclusion follows from the evidence that the of controversial subjects is primarily one of presented in this section question method. Teachers and laymen generally are opposed to the presentation of debatable ques tions as tho they were not debatable. This would be propaganda, as pointed out in the 1937 Yearbook of the National Council for the Social Studies. The intelligent and practical approach, as indicated by the teachers of recog nized ability in the present study, is thru the forum procedure.'” Here the primary purpose The Social Studies Curriculum. Fourteer uirer, May 17, 1936. p. 11 the National Education Association). Edu I ition Against Propa Howard E. Wilson, 18 Lawrence Hall, Harvard Un ®In his study (The Social Understandings of the Superintendent of Schools, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1934 een 51-53) Bair found that superintendents ranked the methods for treating controver questions in the following order 1) ‘on- areful study of various angles of questions with much “research” reading of compet opposing and intermediate : s discussion following (1); and (3) debates following (1) 1 [ 225 ] and reference materials. For suggesti is not “‘to reach a group decision on a question, helpful instructional materials consult ‘J but to air varied views in a friendly discussion and clarify the individual thinking of those 26 to 34 of this bulletin, and Guides to present.” '! A fundamental requisite for discus- Material for Teachers published by the H sion groups is contact with many source books Wilson Company.'” ‘ Hodgkins, George W. A Guide to Newer Methods in Teaching the Social Studies. Bulletin N Cambridge tional Council for the Social Studies, a department of the National Education Association (Sec.: Howard E. Wilson Hall, Harvard University), 1936. p. 61. * Townsend, Mary E., and Stewart, Alice G. Guides to Study Material for Teachers. New York: H. W. Wilson Cx VERY COMMUNITY, urban and rural, is filled with challenges to achieve the good life. The physical health and safety of our citizens can be still further increased thru cooperative planning and action. The beauty of our homes, streets, parks and playgrounds, countryside, and public places can be enhanced immeasurably. The recreational and leisure-time facilities for child hood and adulthood need to be expanded in every population center. The cul- tural life needs to be deepened thru community participation in music, arts, pageantry, and similar spiritual and esthetic endeavors. The quantity and quality of the agricultural and industrial goods and services with which we satisfy out needs for daily living can be multiplied to provide a standard of living far beyond the present level. Im general, the community tasks awaiting the positive and vigorous attack of the hosts of eager American children and youth present a thrilling adventure in social betterment.—Paul R. Hanna in 1935 Yearbook, Department of Elementary School Principals. p. 544. ”” 226 | VI. The Local Community as an Area of Study Another important question of social studies instruction, closely associated with the problem of method, but also involving content and rade placement, is: “How and to what extent should the local community be studied ?” Cur- rent educational discussion, at least, places con- siderable emphasis upon the values to be ob- tained from exploring and studying the local environment. This point of view may be il- lustrated by a quotation from the /nstructional Guide for Elementary Schools published by the Michigan Department of Public Instruction: The finest teaching is that which best adjusts the child to his own total life situation and to his own individual life problems. Because of this the child’s real community provides the most important teach- ing situation. It is imperative that each teacher develop the utmost skill in utilizing the community as a natural laboratory. Basing the children’s activi- ties upon the realities of the social situation is the surest, most understandable, and most effective way of making the curriculum “modern’—or rather, functional.’ Do teachers of recognized ability agree with this point of view? What specific phases of 1 Michigan Department of Public Instruction the Department, 1936. p. 60. Instructional Guide for Elementary Schools community life do they think should be studied at each school level ? To what extent do teach- ers bring their pupils in direct contact with these specific aspects? It is the purpose of this to to these questions. section present information in answer The questionnaire described ‘‘direct or first- hand contacts” (1) thru trips and excursions, usually informal group as those obtained, expeditions, focused upon a specific area, and limited in time to a few hours or days; (2) thru community surveys, usually involving sys tematic investigation and record-keeping, more or less comprehensive in character, and extend ing for weeks or even an entire term; (3) thru speakers, motion pictures, and exhibits, usually attempts thru verbal or visual means to illus- trate and explain social processes. General Topics Studied and Thought To Be Suitable for Study An outline of items suggested as essential for a comprehensive view of a community and presumably necessary for an understanding of 3ulletin No. 301. Lan Mich TABLE 25.—PERCENT OF TEACHERS REPORTING COMMUNITY ASPECTS AS DESERVING AND RECEIVING INSTRUCTION THRU DIRECT CONTACTS AT EACH SCHOOL LEVEL Percent of teachers Elementary Junior high Senior high school school school Categories of outline Desirable Studied Desirable Studied Desirable Studied for in for in for in study practise study practise study practise 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Physical environment............ 78.7 54.4 71.8 41.4 43.0 2 B. Historical background............. 62.0 37.6 68.7 42.4 56.7 33.5 GaN Bicigk diacie ddNdndsavecane 15.0 7.8 38.8 18.8 54.5 25.0 D, Community organization and control 44.1 26.3 63.0 37.8 62.2 34.3 1. Government structure. . 36.6 18.4 75.9 52.5 73.4 53.4 ee 0 ido ove wienevy ac 10.8 4.3 39.1 18.9 60.6 29.9 Gk kno dc a19 50.0. 8ew wiv ce : 58.9 36.6 69.9 42.4 60.6 32.2 E. The community's economic and industrial environment 40.3 22.3 50.0 24.9 48.6 20.5 F. Supplementary cultural influences and activities 46.4 24.4 56.1 26.7 50.7 22.2 G. Conclusions 1. Evidence of social problems......... Fee 29.4 14.4 57.8 33.8 65.7 319 6 2. Next steps in improving the community. . 40.7 19.3 60.5 32.6 65.9 34.9 3. Evidences of cultural and social growth 29.7 15.9 53.9 28.1 58.7 28.0 4. Characteristics of an ideal community. . 51.5 24.5 68.9 38.6 66.5 35.8 Read table as follows: 78.7 percent of the elementary teachers checked items classified as physical environment as belonging in the elementary grades; 54.4 percent of the elementary teachers reported as giving first-hand instruction on these items 71.8 percent of the junior high-school teachers checked physical environment items as belonging in the junior high-school level, and 41.4 percent of the junior high-school teachers checked these items as receiving first-hand study thru their instruction; 43.0 per cent of the senior high-school teachers placed physical environment topics at the senior high-school level: and 21.2 percent of the senior high-school teachers are giving first-hand instruction in physical environment at the senior high-school | level N “NI social problems at the community level was presented to the social studies teachers partici- pating in this study. These teachers checked within the outline those items which they be- lieved properly to belong, altho not necessarily taught now, at the school level at which each was teaching. A second check on the same out- line indicated those items which the teacher used regularly to help pupils study realistically and first-hand thru excursions and trips or com- munity surveys. The complete outline may be seen by inspec- tion of pages 7 and 8 of the questionnaire re- produced on pages 253 and 254. Table 25 gives the broad categories of the outline and the average percent of teachers at each grade level checking the subordinate topics under each classification heading. T'wo sets of percents are shown for each grade level: the percent of teachers who checked items so classified in the outline as belonging at their grade level, and the percent of teachers who checked the various items as receiving first-hand study thru their instruction, The latter column is headed “‘Stud- ied in practise,” the first column “Desirable for study.” Physical environment was and should be stressed in the elementary grades according to the judgments of most elementary and junior high-school teachers. Governmental structure was checked by a large proportion of junior and senior high-school teachers, as belonging at their high-school levels and receiving more at- tention than any other main topic. More than half the senior high-school teachers judged all topics except physical environment (43.0 per- cent) and the community’s economic and in- dustrial environment (48.6 percent) as belong- ing at the senior high-school level. According to 85 percent of these teachers of recognized ability, population problems do not belong at the elementary level, especially topics bearing specifically on age and sex distribution, birth and death rates, marriage and divorce, size of family, and mobility of family. Occupa- tions, races, and nationalities are the only topics dealing with population which more than 25 percent of the elementary teachers believed should be taught in the elementary grades. Community finances was another area generally thought not to require special emphasis in ele- mentary-school instruction. Physical environment, historical background, governmental structure, services, certain aspects of the community’s economic and industrial en- vironment, cultural influences and were placed more frequently at the junio: the senior high-school level. ‘The topics re largely for senior high-school study wer ulation problems and public finance. Specific Topics Studied and Thou To Be Suitable for Study Does practise follow the judgments grade placement? In all cases, a smaller p tion of teachers reported giving first-ha: struction to these topics than the pro; who placed the several topics at thei: level. There were 63 items on specific to; the outline. Lists of specific items are pr below to indicate those topics considered | largest proportion of teachers at each level as belonging in the specified grade and those topics reported by the larg: portion of teachers at each grade le receiving first-hand study thru their inst tion. Each list is arranged in descending o of frequency of checking the items, the pe: after each topic indicating the proportio: teachers of that level checking that topic The fifteen topics listed below were co: sidered to belong at the elementary grad: by two-thirds or more of the elementary studies teachers : Topics Per Local geography ....... 84.5 Early settlement 82.3 Natural resources Rn SO caine od cto: ; : 81 Fire protection 80.1 Communication Police protection Libraries Transportation Traffic and streets Sanitation and health Newspapers and magazines as supplement- ary cultural influences and activities Schools. thin Rie ois 69.2 Topography Rita, ¢ Manufacturing 66.8 Despite the fact that fifteen topics wer placed at the elementary level by two-thirds o: more of the elementary teachers, and nine ot! topics were placed at the elementary grade | by between 50 and 66 percent, the next list of eleven topics was the only one reported by 5U to 60 percent of the elementary teachers as ceiving first-hand study thru their instruct [ 228 ] > a ne nen ee to th fi rOpor- id in- struc- order rcent yn of con- ley el SOC al ent of hers 4.5 32.3 51.6 31.0 were 1s or ther level st of vy 50 $ re- tion. The list of topics below shows the proportion of elementary teachers who checked each as eiving first-hand study thru their instruc- ret tion. Topics Percent of tear he rs Local geography se 60.9 Libraries 60.0 Natural resources 57.5 Trafic and streets 57.5 Fire protection 56.0 Climate eee 55.7 Early settlement 54.9 Communication , +e 53.8 Sanitation and health noe 51.1 Police protection 50.7 Newspapers and magazines 50.2 In the entire outline of 63 items, all but seven topics were thought to belong at the junior high-school level by at least 25 percent of the teachers. Thirteen topics were placed at this level by between 25 and 50 percent, and 18 topics by between 50 and 66 percent of the junior high-school teachers. The 24 topics which were placed at the junior high-school level by two-thirds or more of the junior high- school teachers, are listed below with the per- cent checking these topics. Topics Percent of teachers Fire protection ie 81.3 Police protection Ae 80.4 Early settlement ............. 79.9 Executive and administrative officers 79.7 Newspapers and magazines....... cove oe ne Schools ek ees 79.2 Communication . eee 79.0 Natural resources ee 77.9 Sanitation and health.......... » aes Libraries R = 76.7 Traffic and streets..... oa 76.0 Legislative body se 76.0 Occupations Seesaw a het 76.0 Local geography ............... : 74.9 Transportation .. Daan we aes ae 74.7 Water . zi ae 73.3 Courts . cones Rae 2 Manufacturing ....... mandgans sreidlane, Alea ee er 71.0 Industrial development eee 69.9 Characteristics of an ideal community . 68.9 Population trends 68.7 Participation of community in 1 larger history of county, state, or country. . 68.3 Electric light and power...... 66.9 The list of nine topics below indicates which topics were checked by 50 percent or more of the junior high-school teachers as receiving first-hand study thru their instruction. Altho twenty-tour topics were placed at the junior high-school level by two-thirds or more of the junior high-school teachers, only nine topics were checked as receiving first-hand instruction by at least half of the teachers at this level. Topics Percent of teachers Newspapers and magazines $9.4 Libraries 56.4 Executive and administrative officers 56.2 Schools 55.9 Fire protection $4.8 Legislative body 53.4 Communication §3.2 Police protection §2.0 No topic in the outline of 63 items was checked by less than 33 percent of the senior high-school teachers as belonging at the senior high-school level. applies to some extent to this level. Only eleven Therefore, the entire outline topics were so placed by two-thirds or more of the teachers, altho 34 topics were placed at the senior high-school level by between 50 and 66 percent of the senior high-school teachers. The eleven topics placed at the senior high school level by at least two-thirds of the senior high-school teachers are listed below. Note that the first three mentioned are the three most practised items. Topics Percent of teachers Executive and administrative officers 74.0 Courts 73.4 Legislative body 72.9 Taxation 72.8 Newspapers and magazines 70.9 Standards of living 70.2 Occupations 69.6 Labor conditions 69.1 Schools 68.3 Characteristics of an ideal community 66.5 Relief 66.4 Inspection of the proportion of senior high- school teachers giving first-hand instruction in the topics of this outline shows that there were only three topics which were checked in this respect by half or more of the senior high-school teachers. As few as 10 percent checked some of the topics. “executive and administrative officers” (54.6 percent). The courts (52.9 percent) and the legislative body (52.8 percent) were the other two most frequently checked ‘topics from the The topic most often checked is point of view of practise. Comparing the lists of topics placed at each of the three grade levels, it may be seen that all [ 229 ] of the fifteen topics in the elementary list (ex- cept topography) are included in the junior high-school list but are listed in a different order of emphasis; five of the topics included in the junior high-school list, but not in the elementary grade list, are also included in the senior high-school list. Five of the topics, in- cluding water services, industrial development, population trends, electric light and power, and the part of the community in larger history of the county, state, and country are the only topics which were placed exclusively at the junior high-school level. The four topics, taxa- tion, standards of living, labor conditions, and relief, are the only topics placed exclusively at the senior high-school level. —I'wo topics are car- ried thruout the lists at all three levels: (1) the school as a community service; and (2) newspapers and magazines as supplementary cultural influences and activities. Many more topics were placed at each level than were checked with regard to practise. In this respect, the elementary grade teachers showed greater tendency to practise the topics they placed at the elementary grade level than teachers in the higher levels. The senior high- school social studies teachers gave very little first-hand instruction on the topics they placed at their level, possibly because of a fuller and a more rigid schedule than in the lower levels. What small amount of first-hand instruction was practised by the senior high-school social studies teachers, however, dealt primarily with those very topics which the teachers had most emphatically placed at the senior high-school level. Direct Study of the Community, an Integral Part of Social Studies In- struction There are two possible misinterpretations of the suggestion that the community should be a laboratory for social studies instruction. The first is the belief that direct experience refers merely to contact with the more or less ma- terial objects of the community such as fire sta- tions, city hall, police stations, water works, and similar agencies. This point of view mini- mizes the people, the climate of opinion, social programs, propaganda, and the other less tang- ible aspects of community life. As stated in the 1936 Yearbook of the Department of Su; tendence, “if pupils are to have genuine standing of their environment, they mu given the opportunity to examine and to « ate the intangible processes of group life as the tangible social machinery and tions.” ? A second misinterpretation is the ove phasis of direct contacts as a means of lear It is neither economical of time nor nec: to have direct experiences so far as many p of learning are concerned. At the same the reverse is equally undesirable—name! attempt to help pupils acquire insights n by academic discussion and by reading y understanding may be had more efficiently t direct contacts. Hence, there falls upor teacher of the social studies the responsibilit reconciling desired objectives and the chology of efficient learning with the pract limitations of each teaching situation. Coo; tion between classroom teachers and adn trators will be necessary on this problen pointed out in the earlier section of this bul under the discussion of methods and aids It should be noted that direct comn contacts vary as to the amount of pupil pa pation involved. The 1936 Yearbook of Department of Superintendence identified t! types: (1) Observational—involving primarily pass study or examination of community agencies processes (excursions and trips). (2) Participational—where pupils join or co ate in some established social process (clear campaigns, community chest drives, etc.). (3) Contributory—including original and tive activities of pupils to build upon and to prove community characteristics.” Examples of types (2) and (3) are t found in the 1936 Yearbook and in Hanna's port entitled Youth Serves the Communi From the federal Works Progress Admi: tration comes preliminary word of a remar able series of guides to school, government and other types of community records. |! several years the WPA Historical Record Su vey has had people examining, classifying, a listing public records. Most of the basic wo: has been completed for the more than th: | thousand counties of the United States. The 2 National Education Association, Department of Superintendence. The Social Studies Curriculum. Fourteenth Yea Washington, D. C.: the Department, 1936. p. 249. 8 National Education Association, Department of Superintendence, op. cit., p. 254-74. ‘Hanna, Paul, and associates. Youth Serves the Community. New York: D. Appleton-Century Co., 1936. 303 p. { 230 ] sae lem now is one of reproducing the inven cludes a brief historical sketch, a description of rories and distributing them to teachers, at the county governmental machinery, an expla- hivists, and historians. The following inven- nation of the location and classification of the wales tories have been published: Allegany County, records, and a brief description of the records \farvland; Morris County, New Jersey; Fay- to be found in each public office. Similar in ette County, Kentucky; and Hamilton County, ventories have been made of many cities. ‘The Ohio. The remaining counties may be issued guides produced to date indicate here is an in more permanent form if the demand war- invaluable aid for studying the ramifications rants the cost. The report of each county in- | of all types of governmental service Works Progress Administration funds have been allotted primarily for salaries for unemployed workers, not for pri: 7 their investigations. A general demand for the inventories may be expected to lead eventually to provision sae tion in permanent form. Inquiries may be made at the state offices of WPA or at the national office in Washingt ) tim VI ty ps ne n as | tl ONTINUOUS EVALUATION is essential to determine the degree ot iree effectiveness of the social studies program and to obtain an intelligent basis for curriculum improvement. An adequate program of appraisal provides evi dence of the degree to which all of the important purposes of the social studies Gi are being realized. To this end, teachers will increasingly use a variety of evaluation methods instead of limiting themselves to written examinations. A per comprehensive plan of appraisal also involves cumulative studies of pupils and n cumulative records of their behavior beyond the years of formal schooling so that the relative permanency of these educational experiences may be determined ‘le Evaluation is necessary, it is practicable, but it involves a new conception of methods of appraisal which modify radically our present procedures.—/936 Yearbook, Department of Superintendence. p. 343. » DE > { it inis irl tal Fo sul and ' ork 1ret Phe ok VII. Standard Tests in the Social Studies Continuous appraisal is as essential in social studies instruction as in any other part of edu- cation. ‘Thru systematic evaluation the teacher may discover how effective the curriculum is proving for each pupil and where more helpful experiences are needed. Thru systematic infor- mation of his progress, the pupil may cooperate more intelligently in directing his own energies toward worthy purposes. Objective evidence from evaluation provides a basis for coopera- tion between teachers and parents, not only in improving the school’s program, but in making all community influences constructive elements in social education. Standard tests reported by teachers of recog- nized ability—The present survey asked teachers to list the standard tests which had been most helpful in evaluating their teaching of the social studies. A rather striking fact was that 79 percent of the 1764 teachers did not report a single test. Many who replied to this question apparently did not know what was meant by the term “standard test.’’ Often they listed social studies textbooks, and books on educational psychology and method. Others re- ported questions found in textbooks and in pro- fessional magazines. A few gave the names of tests which had been developed in connection with the preparation of local courses of study. Rarely are any of these tests standardized.' If the testing movement has made so little progress in convincing “teachers of recognized ability” of its possible usefulness, what may be said of its impression on typical teachers ? A few teachers gave reasons for not using standard tests. The most frequently men- tioned reason was that many tests were inade- quate measures of the purpose of instruction. Existing tests were thought to measure subject- matter, but not attitudes, insights, and the less tangible aspects of instruction. Lack of funds to purchase tests was given as another reason. Four schoolboards were reported as to the use of tests. Perhaps still another is to be found in the widespread devel. of new-type tests in connection wit! courses of study. One hundred and ten different t ported by social studies teachers, were tified as to authors and publishers.® \] the tests were reported only once, a few and eighteen tests were mentioned mor three times. The latter are marked w asterisk. The tests mentioned at each school le arranged alphabetically to avoid impli of a rank order of merit. It will be noted ¢ several tests are listed for use in juni senior high-school classes, whereas oth: reported as helpful in elementary schools as junior high schools. The range for each test is intended is noted in each case the information was available. Tests Used by Elementary-Schoo! Teachers Analytical Scales of Attainment in Geograt M. E. Branom and M. J. Van Wagenen. Ran Division 2, grades 5 and 6; division 3, grad and 8. Forms A, B and C. Minneapolis } tional Test Bureau, 1932. Branom’s Diagnostic Tests in Geography, by M Branom. Range: grades 5-8. Bloomington, | McKnight and McKnight, 1926. Brueckner-Cutright Essential Location Exer. Geography, by L. J. Brueckner and P. Cutrig Range: grades 5-8. Minneapolis: Educationa Bureau, 1927. Buckingham-Stevenson Place Geography Test B. R. Buckingham and P. R. Stevenson. Ra: grades 5-8. Bloomington, Illinois: Public § Publishing Co., 1926. Check Tests to Accompany Carpenter's “Aroun World with the Children,” by G. D. Str: R. Mort, and J. E. Dransfield. New York: An can Book Co., 1929. 1A standard test is one that has the following characteristics: (1) scientifically constructed for validity and relial uniform procedure of administration; (3) objectivity in scoring; and (4) interpretation of results by comparative nor 2 For suggestions in the field of American history consult the monograph by Howard R. Anderson and E. F. Lindquist ¢ Selected Test Items in American History, published by the National Council for the Social Studies and available from tl tary, 18 Lawrence Hall, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. For general suggestions on testing in the social studies sé ter 8 of The Social Studies Curriculum, 1936 Yearbook of the Department of Superintendence, National Education A and Kelley, T. L., and Krey, A. C. Tests and Measurements in the Social Sciences. Report of the Commission on Studies, American Historical Association, Part IV. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1934. 635 p Among the general books in the field of new-type testing are the following: Hawkes, Herbert E.; Lindquist, | Mann, C. R. The Construction and Use of Achievement Examinations. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1936. 497 p Charles. Classroom Tests. Boston: Ginn and Co., 1926. 346 p. 1 Rugh, G. M. Tests and Measurements in High School In Yonkers, N. Y.: World Book Co., 1927. Part III, p. 251-375. 8 For a list of 223 standard tests in the social studies consult the monograph by Gertrude E. Hildreth entitled A Bi/ of Mental Tests and Rating Scales, published by the Psychological Corporation, New York, 1933. 242 p [ 232 ] )] y, by ange: des 7 duca M. E. inois: res in right. Test ts, by ange: ‘chool 1d the er, P. meri Detroit Examination in Social Science, by Detroit Public Schools. Range: troit: Detroit Public Schools. intermediate grades. De Detroit Standard Tests in Geography, by Detroit Public Schools. Range: grades 4-9. Detroit: Detroit Public Schools, 1918, 1922. Gregory-Haggerty Geography Test, by C. A. Greg orv and M. E. Haggerty. Range: grades 4-6. Cin- cinnati: C. A. Gregory Co., 1926. Hahn-Lackey Geography Scale, by H. H. Hahn and E. E. Lackey. Range: grades 4-8. Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Co., 1918; re- vised, 1922. Harlan Test for Information in American History, by C. L. Harlan. Range: grades 7 through high school. Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Pub- lishing Co., 1917. lowa State Teachers’ College Geography Test, Parts I and II. Range: grades 4 and 5. Cedar Falls: Iowa State Teachers’ College, 1921. Junior American History Test, by H. J. Carman, T. N. Barrows, and B. D. Wood. Range: grades 7 and 8 and junior high school. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1929. Kelty-Moore Test of Concepts in the Social Studies, by Kelty and Moore. Forms A and B. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Learning and Teaching American History in the Middle Grades of Elementary School, by Mary G. Kelty. Boston: Ginn and Co., 1936. Manchester Remedial and Diagnostic Tests, by Meyer and Hamm. Range: unknown. North Man- chester, Indiana: Bureau of Tests and Measure- ments, Manchester College. *Metropolitan Achievement Tests, (New York City Edition) by S. F. Bayne, F. B. Graham, edited by J. S. Orleans. Advanced Battery, New York City Edition. Range: grades 7 and 8. Spelling vocabu- lary, reading, arithmetic, English literature, his- tory, geography. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1932. *New Stanford Achievement Test, Forms V, W, X, Y, and Z, by T. L. Kelley, G. M. Ruch, and L. M. Terman. Range: primary examination—grades 2-3, reading, arithmetic, spelling; advanced ex- amination—grades 4-9, reading, spelling, arith- metic, language usage, literature, history and civics, geography, physiology and_ hygiene. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1929. Philadelphia Survey Test in Geography, by P. A. Boyer. Range: grade 5. Philadelphia: Division of Educational Research, Philadelphia Public Schools, 1926. Posey-Van Wagenen Geography Series, by M. J. Van Wagenen. Range: Division I, grades 5 and 6; Division II, grades 7 and 8. Bloomington, IIli- nois: Public School Publishing Co., 1922. Pressey-Richards Test for the Understanding of American History, by L. C. Pressey and R. C. Richards, Range: grades 6-12. Bloomington, IIli- nois: Public School Publishing Co., 1922. [ 9 * y & | Tests. Forms I and II Forms III and IV by T. I arithmetic computatio1 Public School Aci by J. S. Torgerson. tevement Orleans; Reading, arithmetic reasoning, language usage, spelling and School Pul nature study, health. Bloomington, Illinois; Public 1928, 1930 and 1931. grammar, history, geography, lishing Co., Ridgley-Russell-Harr Unit Tests in Geography, by D. C. Ridgley, H. H. Russell, and L. Har Bloomington, Illinois: McKnight and McKnight, 1928. Silver, Burdett Geography Tests. (In revision to fit new Barrows-Parker geography series.) New York: Silver, Burdett Co., 1937. Social Studies Achievement Tests, by H. O and Mendenhall. Forms A and B. Range: Low seventh to high ninth. Boston: Ginn and Co., 1935. process ol Rugg Standard Graduation Examination for Elementary Schools, by A. S. Otis and J. S. Orleans. Spelling, reading, vocabulary, arithmetic, grammar, lan usage, literature, history, geography. World Book Co., 1930, 1931. guage Yonkers: Tests for Unified Course of Study, by Meyer, Hamm and Jolliff. North Manchester, Indiana. Bureau of Tests and Measurements, Manchester College. *The Modern School Achievement Tests, by A. | Gates, P. R. Mort, P. M. Symonds, R. B. Spence, G. S. Craig, De F. Stull, H. Hatch, A. I. Shaw and L. B. Krieger. Reading comprehension, read ing speed and accuracy, arithmetic computation, arithmetic reasoning, diagnostic test in spelling, health knowledge, language usage, social studies civics, social studies—geography, elementary New York: Pub lications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1931. —history and science. Bureau of Unit Elementary Tests, by Meyer, Homer and Eiken- berry. Range: grades 4-8 inclusive. North Man- chester, Indiana. Bureau of Tests and Measure ments, Manchester College. *Unit Scales of Attainment, by M. E. Branom, L. J. 3rueckner, A. M. Jordan, P. Cutright, W. A. Anderson, M. G. Kelty, A. Dvorak and M. J. Van Wagenen. Includes tests in reading, arithme- tic, language, spelling, geography, history, litera ture, and Range: (only) Ist grade; reading (only) 2nd grade; sion 1, grades 3 and 4; division 2, grades 5 and 6; division 3, grades 7 and 8; division 4, grade 9. Minneapolis: Educational Test Bureau, 1932 Wiedefeld-Walther Geography Test, by M. T. Wiedefeld and E. C. Walther. Range: grades 4-8 Yonkers: Worid Book Co., 1931. Witham Geography Test of Europe—New Series, by E. C. Witham. Range: les; Southern California School Book Depository, 1929. elementary science. reading divi grades 6-9. Los Ange Witham Geography Test of the United States—New Series, by E. C. Witham. Range: grades 5-8. Los Angeles: Southern California School Book De- pository, 1928. 3] Witham Geography Test of the World—New Series, by E. C. Witham. Range: elementary and high school. Los Angeles: Southern California School Book Depository, 1928. Witham Standard Geography Tests, by E. C. Witham. Range: grades 5-12. Newark: J. L. Hammett Co., 1916-1921. Tests Used by Junior High-School Teachers American Council European History Test, by H. J. Carman, W. C. Langsam and B. D. Wood. Range: high school and college. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1928. Ancient and Medieval History Tests, by L. N. Brown. Oklahoma City: Harlow Publishing Co., 1930, 1931. Atlanta Series of Tests. English Test, grades 7-8, Algebra, junior high school; Biology, grade H-9; English Classics; American History, grade H-8; Latin, junior and senior high school; Spelling. Atlanta, Georgia: Board of Education, 1929. Barr’s Diagnostic Tests in American History, by A. S. Barr. Range: grades 8-12. Bloomington, IIli- nois: Public School Publishing Co., 1920. Bowman (Gipson) United States History Test, by L. C. Bowman. Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Co., 1931. Branom’s Diagnostic Tests in Geography, by M. E. Branom. Range: grades 5-8. Bloomington, I|linois: McKnight and McKnight, 1926. *Brown-W oody Civics Test, by A. W. Brown and C. Woody. Range: grades 7-12. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1926. ~ tolumbia Research Bureau American History Test, by H. J. Carman, T. N. Barrows and B. D. Wood. Range: high school and college. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1926. ~ ‘ooperative American History Test. New York: Cooperative Test Service, 1930, 1931, 1932. ~ Jooperative Ancient History Test. New York: Co- operative Test Service, 1930. Cc ‘ooperative European History Test. New York: Co- operative Test Service, 1930, 1931, 1932. *Denny-Nelson Tests in American History, by E. C. Denny and M. J. Nelson. Range: grades 7 and 8. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1928. Early Progress Workbook, by West and Shellman. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Fourteen Tests in Vocational Civics, by H. C. Hill. For use with H. C. Hill’s “Vocational Civics” and “Community and Vocational Civics” and H. C. Hill, and D. H. Sellers, “My Occupation.” Boston: Ginn and Co., 1931. Gregory-Spencer Geography Test, by C. A. Gregory and P. L. Spencer. Range: grades 6-8, and normal school students. Cincinnati: C. A. Gregory Co., 1923. Hakn-Lackey Geography Scale, by H. H. H E. E. Lackey. Range: grades 4-B. Bloo Illinois: Public School Publishing Co.. 1 vised, 1922. Harlan Test for Information in American | by C. L. Harlan. Range: grades 7 thr school. Bloomington, Illinois: Public Sc} lishing Co., 1917. *Hill Civic Attitude Test, by H. C. Hill. } grades 6-12. Bloomington, III].: Public Scl lishing Co., 1926. *Hill Civic Information Tests, by H. C. H H. E. Wilson. Range: grades 6-12. Blo Illinois: Public School Publishing Co., 19: Hill-Wilson Civic Action Test, by H. C. H H. E. Wilson. Range: grades 6-12. Bloon Illinois: Public Schoo! Publishing Co., 192 Iowa Third Annual Every Pupil Test in States History, by H. R. Anderson and Andrews. Range: high school. Iowa Cit University of Iowa, 1931. lowa Third Annual Every Pupil Test in Hi tory, by H. R. Anderson and G. G. Range: high school. Iowa City: State U: of Iowa, 1931. Junior American History Test, by H. J. Ca N. Barrows, and B. D. Wood. Range: and $8 and junior high school. Yonkers Book Co., 1929. Kansas State Teachers College Scholarship | American History Test. Emporia: Bureau cational Measurements and Standards, K State Teachers College, 1927, 1928. Kansas State Teachers College Scholarship | Constitution Test. Emporia: Bureau of | tional Measurements and Standards, Kansa Teachers College, 1927, 1928. Kansas State Teachers College Scholarship ( Current History Test. Emporia: Bureau of cational Measurements and Standards, K State Teachers College. Kansas State Teachers College Scholarship ( Social Civics Test. Emporia: Bureau of | tional Measurements and Standards, Kansas $ Teachers College, 1927. Kansas State Teachers College Scholarship ( World History Test. Emporia: Bureau of | cational Measurements and Standards, K State Teachers College, 1928. Kelty-Moore Test of Concepts in the Social Stu by Kelty and Moore. Forms A and B. New \ Charles Scribner’s Sons. Kepner’s Background Test in Social Scien Tyler Kepner. Forms A and B. Range: G 9-12. Cambridge: Harvard University Press Lynch American History Test Series, by I. R. Ly Range: grade 8. Minneapolis: Educational! Bureau, 1926. [ 234] ihn and ge 0] Py ld H idrews versity lan, | ades 7 Worl ] Jontest f Edu- Cansas ontest Educ a- s Stat Jontest Cansas Jontest edu a- s State ‘ontest Edu- -ansas tudies, York: rrades 1924. uynch. Test Vanchester Semester-End Achievement Tests, by Meyer, Eikenberry and others. North Manchester, Indiana: Bureau of Tests and Measurements, Manchester College. *Mectropolitan Achievement Tests (New York City edition), by S. F. Bayne, F. B. Graham, edited by 1. §. Orleans. Advanced Battery, New York City edition. Range: grades 7 and 8. Spelling, vocabu- lary, reading, arithmetic, English literature, his- tory, geography. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1932. Modern Progress Workbook, by West and Shellman. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Modern School Achievement Tests, by A. I. Gates, P. R. Mort, P. M. Symonds, R. B. Spence, G. S. Craig, De F. Stull, R. Hatch, A. I. Shaw and L. B. Krieger. Reading comprehension, reading speed and accuracy, arithmetic computation, arithmetic reasoning, diagnostic test in spelling, health knowledge, language usage, social studies—his- tory and civics, social studies—geography, ele- mentary science. New York: Bureau of Publica- tions, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1931. *New Stanford Achievement Test, Forms V, W, X, Y, and Z, by T. L. Kelley, G. M. Ruch and L. M. Terman. Range: primary examination—grades 2-3, reading, arithmetic, spelling; advanced examination—grades 4-9, reading, spelling, arith- metic, language usage, literature, history and civics, geography, and physiology and hygiene. Yonkers: World Book Company, 1929. Ohio Every Pupil Test, conducted by the Ohio State Department of Education. Includes Plane Geome- try, Physics, First Year Latin, Second Year Latin, General Science, Chemistry, Arithmetic Prob- lem Test, one aspect of 7th, 8th, and 12th Year American History, and Algebra. Columbus: State Department of Education, April 1931. Philadelphia Survey Test in History. Range: grade 7B. Ref.: Browne, E. C., and Boyer, P. A. Report on survey test in history of the United States, grade 7B, conducted June 1928. Historical Out- look 20: 17-23, 1929. Posey-Van Wagenen Geography Series, by M. J. Van Wagenen. Range: Division I, grades 5 and 6; Division II, grades 7 and 8. Bloomington, III.: Public School Publishing Company, 1922. Public School Achievement Tests. Forms I and II by J. S. Orleans; Forms III and IV by T. L. Tor- gerson. Reading, arithmetic computation, arith- metic reasoning, language usage, spelling, gram- mar, history, geography, nature study, and health. Bloomington, IIl.: Public School Publishing Com- pany, 1928, 1930, and 1931. Ridgley-Russell-Harr Unit Tests in Geography, by D. C. Ridgley, H. H. Russell, and L. Harr. Bloom- ington, Ill.: McKnight and McKnight, 1928. Rochester Board of Education American History Test for History III. Ref.: Ruch, G. M. “The Objective or New Type Examination.” Chicago: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1929. Russell-Harr Diagnostic Geography Tests, by H. H Russell and L. Harr. Bloomington, Ill.: McKnight and McKnight, 1926. Stormzand American History Teaching and Testing by M. A. Stormzand. Range: grades 7-12. New York: Macmillan Company, 1927. Twentieth Century Test in American History, Vests I and II, by Gale Smith. Range: high school. Fowler, Indiana: Benton Review Shop, 1931, 1935 Twenty Tests to Accompany Muzzey’s “History of the American People,” by M. C. Bishop and FE. K Robinson. Boston: Ginn and Co., 1929. Twenty-four Tests to Accompany Robinson and Beard'’s “History of Europe: Our Own Times,” by M. C. Bishop. Boston: Ginn and Co., 1930. Twenty-four Tests in Ancient and Medieval History to Accompany Robinson and Breasted’s “History of Europe: Ancient and Medieval,” by E. P. Stick- ney. Boston: Ginn and Co., 1931. Twenty-four Tests in World History to Accompany Robinson-S mith-Breasted’s “Our World Today and Yesterday,” by E. P. Stickney. Boston: Ginn and Co., 1930. Unit Elementary Tests, by Meyer, Homer, and Eikenberry. Range: grades 4-8 inclusive. North Manchester, Indiana: Bureau of ‘Tests and Measurements, Manchester College. *Unit Scales of Attainment, by M. E. Branom, L. J. Brueckner, A. M. Jordan, P. Cutright, W. A Anderson, M. G. Kelty, A. Dvorak and M. J. Van Wagenen. Includes tests in reading, arithme- tic, language, spelling, geography, history, litera- ture, and elementary science. Range: reading (only) Ist grade; reading (only) 2nd grade; divi- sion 1, grades 3 and 4; division 2, grades 5 and 6; 9. Minneapolis: Educational Test Bureau, 1932 division 3, grades 7 and 8; division 4, grade Vannest Diagnostic Test in Modern European His- tory, by C. G. Vannest. Range: secondary school. Bloomington, Indiana: Bureau of Cooperative Research, Indiana University, 1921. Van Wagenen American History Scales (Revised Editorial), by M. J. Van Wagenen. Range: Scale S1, grades 5 and 6; Scale $2, grades 7 and 8; Scale S3, grades 9-12; Scale R1, grades 5 and 6; Scale R2, grades 7 and 8. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia Uni- versity, 1922. Wiedefeld-Walther Geography Test, by M. T Wiedefeld and E. C. Walther. Range: grades 4-8 Yonkers: Werld Book Co., 1931. Witham Comprehensive History Test, by E. C. Witham. Range: grades 7 and 8. Newark: J. L. Hammett Co., 1924. Witham Standard Geography Tests, by E. C. Wit- ham. Range: grades 5-12. Newark: J. L. Hammett Co., 1916-1921. - [ 235 ] Tests Used by Senior High-School Teachers *A merican Council Civics and Government Test, by R. D. Leigh, D. McGoldrick, P. M. Odegard and B. D. Wood. Range: high school and college. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1928. American Council Economics Test, by H. Taylor, T. N. Barrows, and B. D. Wood. Range: high school Yonkers: World Book Co., 1929, and college. American Council European History Test, by H. J. Carman, W. C. Langsan and B. D. Wood. Range: high school and college. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1928. American History Tests, Forms A and B, by J. A. Kinneman. Range: high school seniors and college freshmen. Bloomington, Illinois: McKnight and McKnight. Barr-Daggett Tests in American History, by A. S. Barr and C. J. Daggett. Range: Senior High School. Forms A and B. Minneapolis: Educational Test Bureau, 1932. Barr’s Diagnostic Tests in American History, by A. S. Barr. Range: grades 8-12. Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Co., 1920. Bowman (Gipson) United States History Test, by L. C. Bowman. Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Co., 1931. *Brown-W oody Civics Test, by A. W. Brown and C. Woody. Range: grades 7-12. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1926. Burton Social-Science-Civics Test, by W. H. Burton. Range: grades 7-12. Cincinnati: C. A. Gregory Co., 1930. *Columbia Research Bureau American History Test, by H. J. Gorman, T. N. Barrows and B. D. Wood. Range: high school and college. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1926. *Cooperative American History Test. New York: Cooperative Test Service, 1930, 1931, 1932. Denny-Nelson Tests in American History, by E. C. Denny and M. J. Nelson. Range: grades 7 and 8. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1928. Detroit Examinations in History, by Detroit Public Schools. Range: high school. Detroit: Detroit Pub- lic Schools, 1925, 1926. *Gregory American History Tests (revised), by C. A. Gregory. Range: grades 7 and 8. Cincinnati: C. A. Gregory Co., 1926. Gregory-Owens Tests in Medieval and Modern His- tory, by C. A. Gregory and A. D. Owens. Range: grade 11 thru normal school. Cincinnati: C, A. Gregory Co., University of Cincinnati, 1926. Harlan Test for Information in American History, by C. L. Harlan. Range: grades 7 thru high school. Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Co., 1917. Indiana Composite Achievement Test, by Wright. Range: grades 7 and 8. A American history, Indiana history, civi raphy, language, reading, physiology, Bloomington: Bureau of Cooperative R Indiana University, 1927. Institute of Educational Research Ancient Test, by B. D. Wood. For college entran York: Institute of Educational Research, J College, 1922. Iowa Every Pupil Academic Contest Exami: in World History. lowa City: State Un of Iowa, 1930. *lowa High School Content Examination, | Ruch with the cooperation of G. U. Cleet G. D. Stoddard. Range: high school seni college freshmen. English literature, grammar, mathematics, science, history an science. Iowa City: Bureau of Educatior search and Service, University of lowa, | *Ilowa High School Content Examination, by ‘ Ruch with the cooperation of G. L. Huffeke Knight and W. Koerth. Range: high school s and college freshmen. English literature, |] grammar, mathematics, science, history and science. Iowa City: Bureau of Education search and Service, University of Iowa, 1924 *lowa Third Annual Every Pupil Test in An Government, by H. R. Anderson. Iowa Cit University of Iowa, 1931. *Kansas State Teachers College Scholarship | American History Test. Emporia: Bureau of } cational Measurements and Standards, K State Teachers College, 1927, 1928. Kansas State Teachers College Scholarship ¢ Constitution Test. Emporia: Bureau of | tional Measurements and Standards, K State Teachers College, 1927, 1928. Kansas State Teachers College Scholarship ¢ Social Civics Test. Emporia: Bureau of | tional Measurements and Standards, Kansas $ Teachers College, 1927. Kelty-Moore Test of Concepts in the Social Stu by Kelty and Moore. Forms A and B. New \ Charles Scribner’s Sons. Kepner’s Background Test in Social Scien Tyler Kepner. Forms A and B. Range: g: 9-12. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1 Learning and Teaching American Histor} Middle Grades of Elementary School, by Ma Kelty. Boston: Ginn and Co., 1936. *Magruder-Chambers-Clinton American Civics Government Test for High Schools and C by F, A. Magruder, R. J. Clinton, and M Cha-nbers. Range: high school and college. B ington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Co Manchester Semester-End Achievement Tests Meyer, Eikenberry, and others. North M chester, Indiana: Bureau of Tests and Meas ments, Manchester College. [ 236 ] very Pupil Test, conducted by the Ohio Stat Tests i ¢ YY . it F WwW. V tment of Education. Includes plane geon pher MM Hom: ad Guis ( hvsics, first year Latin, second year Latin Follett P a ( al science, chemistry, arithmetic proble yne aspect of 7th, 8th, and 12th year Am Tuer Century 1 n Am in H ts story, and algebra. Columbus: State Depart I and Il Gale Smith. Range: | t of Education, April 1931. Fowler, Ind Benton Review Shop, 1931. 1 | phia Survey Test in History, by B. ( 7 sdenth Cee « Seok te Clekes. bn vyne and P. A. Bover. Range: Grade 7B. P! Rane al it nse Deli B is vhia: Philadelphia Public Schools, Division hates Educational Research. ” Pp , Richards Test for the Understandina f Twenty 7 f mn piven ty Cig s, DY H. 4 1] Imerican History, by L. C. Pressey and R. ( For use with H. C. Hill’s vo tional Cy l Richards. Range: grades 6-12. Bloomington: Illi Comm nity and Vocational Civics” and H. ( ( s Public School Publishing Ce. 1922 Hill and D. H. Seller’s “My Occ vised). Bost Ginn and Co., 1931 " Pressey Scale of Attainment No. 2, by S. L. Press Reading vocabulary, American history, arithmeti *Twenty Tests to Accompany Muzzey’s “H , ng ind English grammar. Range: grade 8. Bloom the American People,” by M. ( Bishop and ] ngton: Department of Psychology, Indiana U1 Wt sens Basta > Csinn and tn. § i versity, 1921. 2 , Vannest Diagnost Test in Modern European His Ouestions in Ancient and Medieval History (now . tory, by C. G. Vannest. Range: seconda G, } liscontinued), Questions in Modern European BI : Ind ' ‘i ‘ : 3loomington, Indiana: Bureau of Cooperatiy < I History, and American History, by D. J. Arrin hI : ; . . , a. search, Indiana niversity, 1921 ¢ Range: high school. New York: College Entrance ng ? ’ 97 930 , ‘ B Book Co., 1929, 1930. Van Wagenen American History Scales (Revised . Social Studies Achievement Tests, by Rugg and Editoria by M Van Wagenen. Range: Scale igte Mendenhall. Forms A and B. Range: low seventh S1, grades 5 and 6; Scale S2, grades 7 and 8; 1.4 . e .* — > > to high ninth. Boston: Ginn and Co., 1935. Scale S3, grades 9-12; Scale Rl, grades 5 and ¢ rica . . : , Scale R2, grad 7 and 8. New York: Bureau St State High School Tests. Lafayette, Indiana: Put . & ; ‘ urean of ORD aget : due University, Division of Educational Refe: Publications, Teachers College, Columbia Univer- > ‘ ”” ence. (Annual testing service.) ity, 1922. } Tests in Unified Social Studies (Western Hemi Wesley Test in Social Terms, by E. B. Wesley. sphere), by Meyer, Homer and Jollief. Chicago: Forms A and B. Range: junior and senior. New Follett Publishing Co. York: Charles Scribner’s Sons M VIII. Texts and Supplementary Books Reported To Be Most Frequently Used by Social Studies Teachers and Pupils Social studies teachers reported texts and level list the books are separated int supplementary books found by them to be most helpful in social studies courses. ‘Tables 26 to 34 which follow give the texts and supple- mentary books reported by ten or more teach- ers. In each list those books which were men- tioned so frequently as to be outstanding in their respective group have an asterisk at the left. The first three tables, numbers 26, 27, and 28, give the supplementary books reported to be most useful to social studies teachers in preparing for their classes. These tables are groups: those most frequently reported frequently mentioned, and those met still less frequently but reported by ten teachers. Tables 29 to 33 list textbooks report social studies teachers of different grade to be helpful to their pupils. The texts ported are listed by the course in whic} are most frequently used. The supplementary books reported f: pils’ use are listed in Table 34.' Some s mentary books are used by pupils at diff arranged by grade level. Within each grade ‘ For another comprehensive list of the sources of supplementary materials consult Guides to Study Material Townsend and Alice G. Stewart; published by the H Mary E W. Wilson Co., foo 7 New York, 1936. 113 p TABLE 26.—SUPPLEMENTARY BOOKS MOST USEFUL TO ELEMENTARY-SCHOO TEACHERS OF SOCIAL STUDIES Author *Carpenter, Frances... . and Gabriel, Casner, Mabel B., Ralph H. *Kelty, Mary G Stull, De Forest, and Hatch, Roy W Van Loon, Hendrik W. Clark, Rose B ‘ Hillyer, Virgil M *Hillyer, Virgil M Packard, Leonard O., and Sinnott, Charles P. Rugg, Harold O Rugg. Harold O *Thralls, Zoe We have assumed that teachers mentioning American Nation referred to this series since it is the only one of However, Albert B. Hart is editor of a series called American Nation. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1904-1908 re [ 24 - TABLE 29.—TEXTS REPORTED TO BE MOST FREQUENTLY USED IN HISTORY COURSES Author Title Publisher Year OOL Eugene C.; Duncalf, Fred Old Europe and Our N R k: and Bacon, Francis — *Rarker, Eugene C.; Webb, Walter Story Our Nation Row, Peterson and ( P.: and Dodd, William E . rnham, Smith, and Jack, Theo The Story of Amer r Your John C. Winston ( re H. Americans rk, Marion G., and Gordy Westward Toward Ame ( irles Scribner's Sons Vilbur F. ( iy, Wilbur F American Beginnings in Eu t ( rles Scribner's Sor 34 Halleck, Reuben P and Frantz Our Nation's Heritage (mer n | k ¢ Juliette ty, Mary G Beginnings of the A Reople Ginn and ( 0 and Nation. It has been assumed that teachers mentioning American Nation referred f However, Albert B. Hart is editor of a series called American Nation. New \Y Br ‘ l National Education Association of the United States 1201 Sixteenth Street, Northwest, Washington. D. C. SOCIAL STUDIES SURVEY Nove r 6 Explanation—This inquiry form is being sent t issroom tea ep n curre é