UC-NRLF $B b? ^^1 LC Digitized by the Internet Archive .w in 2007 with funding from •|/licrosoft Corporation ^details/essentialplaceofOOnatirich I The Essential Place of Religion in Education Monograph Published by National Education Association Ann Arbor, Michigan January, 1916 INTRODUCTION When the Executive Committee of the National Education Association met for its October meeting in 1914, a communication was received from a resident of California offering a prize of one thousand dollars for the best essay on "The Essential Place of Religion in Education with an Outline of a Plan for Introducing Religious Teaching into the Public Schools," provided the Asso- ciation was willing to carry on a prize-essay contest on that subject. The interest that the donor had in the general subject coupled with the fact that the 1915 meeting of the Association was to be held in connection with the Panama-Pacific International Exposition and was to be in the nature of an International Congress on Education were the reasons stated for the offer. Religion was to be defined in a way not to run counter to the creeds of Protestant, Roman Catholic, or Jew. The essential points to be observed were: A Heavenly Father who holds nature and man alike in the hollow of his hand; the commandment of Hillel and Jesus of Nazareth, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and thy neighbor as thyself"; the high ethical teachings and spirit of service and sacrifice indicated in the Sermon on the Mount. The Executive Committee authorized the contest and announcements con- cerning the same were printed in the N. E. A. Bulletin for December and sent to the various educational and religious papers. A nation-wide interest was awakened, as shown by the fact that 1,381 per- sons, representing every state in the Union save one, entered the contest. The essays were limited to ten thousand words. June 1 was set as the date when essays were to be presented, and 432 essays were filed by that time. The essays were read and sorted by five preliminary sets of judges. The final Board of Judges, which had been selected with a view of representing every section or the country, every phase of education, and the various religious ■n.>]ipfs, was as follows: " Adelaide Steele Baylor, State Department of Education, Indian- apolis, Ind. William T. Foster, President, Reed College, Portland, Ore. Louis Grossmann, Principal, Teachers Institute, Hebrew Union College, ^ U'cinnati, Ohio. .iiiU. Phillips, Superintendent of Schools, Birmingham, Ala. iiomas E. Shields, Editor. Catholic Educational Review, Profes- sor of Education, Catholic University of America Wash- . ington, D. C. 4 THE PLACE OF RELIGION IN EDUCATION The decision of the judges was announced in connection with the Friday afternoon meeting of the Association, August 27. The prize was awarded to Charles E. Rugh, Professor of Education, University of California, Berkeley, Cal., and special mention was made of the essays presented by Laura H. Wild, Professor of Biblical History and Literature, Lake Erie College, Painesville, Ohio. Frances Virginia Frisbie, Teacher, Wilkes-Barre High School, ' Wilkes-Barre, Pa. - Clarence Reed, Minister, Unitarian Church, Palo Alto, Cal. .^Anna B. West, Lecturer and Writer, Newburyport, Mass. It will be noted that the writers selected by the judges represent different relationships to the educational system. The Association decided to print a monograph which should contain not only these five essays, but also a synopsis of the points brought out by the other writers. We asked Mr. Rugh to amplify his paper somewhat in order that some of the points might be enlarged upon to a greater extent than was possible under the original limitation. Sara Whedon, formerly head of the English Department, Ann Arbor High School, Ann Arbor, Mich., was asked to prepare the synopsis of the other essays. Of course it has been impossible to present in detail all the various points brought out by the over four hundred writers, but the six papers which follow do present all the general suggestions made in any of the arguments or the out- lines. We trust that the monograph will play a part in the final settlement of a question which has been much discussed and for which a solution must ultimately be found. COMPILER'S NOTE The work of the compiler in preparing the synopsis has been that of the gleaner who follows upon the reaping of a rich harvest and gathers a still abundant store. Altho the five papers which are given in full discur? the sub- ject of religion in the public schools with a wide variety of range, therta still remained in the other four hundred and twenty-seven essays offered for the contest a wealth of suggestive and informative material. To put this into con- densed and systematized forni was the wish of the Association. Thiij synopsis is in no sense exhaustive, either of the subject as a whole, since tlie 'ground already covered in the preceding essays has been omitted except In so far as proved necessary for the sake of connection; or even of the remaining papers, as limits of space compelled keeping closely to what seemed likely to prove most directly suggestive, without lengthy discussion or description. Two bibliographies have been appended of works quoted or ciced, when the author's name was stated: the first, of books and periodicals mentioned in the general discussion of the subject; the second, of those referred to as likely to be helpful to the teacher either for private study or in the cJ ass-room. Well-known fiction and poetry have not been included, as much of both in. con- tained in the books of selections to which reference is made, and teacher* usually have abundance of such material at hand. It has been impossible to verify all the large number of reference;! from so many sources, but it is hoped that there will prove to be no serious errors. THE ESSEJfTIAL PLACE OF KELIGIOIV O EDUCATION AND AN OUTLINE OF A PLAN TO INTRODUCE RELIGIOUS TEACHING INTO THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Charles E. Hugh, Professor of Education, Uniiersity of California Berkeley, CaL ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introductixan , a. Ejlenients in the Problem. I I. "Only the best is good enough for the child." 2. A developing democracy demands unity of public opinion. "^ 3. Churches are based upon principles of differentiation. b. Origin of Problem. I. The new social order has removed the child from the fellowship of the parents during the hours of labor, and in many cases during the hours of leisure. -'. The differentiation of church and state places the responsibility for a general education upon the state. 43. The public school has become a fundamental social institution and must provide for the stimulation, guidance, and control . of all the fundamental impulses of child life. c. Method of Approach. 1. The method of solution can be neither historical nor scientific: it cannot be solved by observation. 2. The relation between religion and education is a problem of genetic psychology. 3. The introduction of "religious teaching" into the public schools is a problem of practical pedagogy and educational statesmanship. ;. Nature of Kd'Jcntion a. Kducation is a life, and a life-long process. 1. A unique characteristic of the child is the ability and disposition to take an inter- est in its own development, even to the making of a new environment. 2. Pluman environment of the child is also unique in that the adults take a special interest in the development of the children. 3. Society is developing special means and methods of favoring the development ot the different phases of human life. b. IJimian life is the achievement of a perpetual triumph thru adjustment. r. Law of life responses^a germinant principle is sensitive and responsive to the "order" that gave it birth and being. 2. Life formulas stated in terms of the law of responser,. 3. The relation between the phases of life axe hierarchial or "Super-Organic," to use Spencer's terms, and their unity or harmony is secured thru the right develop- nt of every phase of human consciousness. is a conscious evolution. i from the standpoint of the child,— cdacatif Icvelopment •ild's Kative impulses. • :d fronr the standpoint of society, education is the process of grafting . ■ ■:'''!"ti,u -oc'al fo.-r,;s p,rd ach^oven.ent.s ^n<,^.^ >h--^n ,,-,:;,... ;.-.,,'..i.-^.. 0 THE PLACE OP RELIGION IN EDUCATION ,?. Nature of Religion \ .'>.;. a. Difficiil'ties met iti tfyin^ to" express the nature of religion. ^ ^ I. "AlfJJid.of raental bKndhe&s" due to focal nature of consciousness: ••2- "I'tie* -limitattona of terfgua^e. ^ ■3" Personal and sectarian prejudices. . WRat religion is not. 1. Religion is not something objective. 2. Religion is not a subject to study. 3. Religion is not a system of doctrines, — not a philosophy. c. Positive description of religion. r. Religion is a phase of human life at its best. 2. Religion is the indiYidual's struggle for existence. (a) Seekii^ a system of permanent values. (b) Conversion from use of inadequate or wrong standards. (c) Triumph over every enemy of personality. 3. Religion as a social factor. (a) Fellowship "of saints. (b) Joint reaction against sin and suIWyig. (c) Promotion of individual and soci^l'^ghteousness. Religious Teaching Good teaching must be religious in spirit as well as in content. , I. Secured by religious teachers. (a) All-round training in normal schools and educational departments. (b) Insisting upon character as a prime qualification. (c) Development of religious life and character of tliose now in the service. 2. Development of intelligent public opinion that will support and demand "best" teaching. 3. Development of religious pedagogy. ■ (a) Religious motive in education. 1. Identification of best impulses with highest ends. 2. Impulses having religious implication. (a) Fear. (b) Respect. (c) Aflfection. (d) Play. (e) Work. 3. "Ends." (a) "Fear of the lyord." (b) Reverence. (c) Devotion. (d) Creative, whole-hearted production. (e) Worship. (b) Means for Religious Education. 1. Pupil. 2. Teacher. 3. Subjects of instruction. (a) World of things. (b) World of persons and achievement of persons. (c) World of. self. (c) Method of religious teaching. 1. Method in instruction. 2. Method in discipline. 3. Method in school government. OUTLINE OF PLAN Introduction 1. A working plan of instruction must conform to the stages of development. 2. Three sets of persons are specifically intecested in the life of the child. (a) The home. (b) The school. (c) The state. 3. Each institution must assume its own specific duty and all must identify ''i interests. THE PLACE OF RELIGION IN EDUCATION 7 ^ Plan I. School. 1. Subjects. (a) Making teachers, patrons, pastors, and pupils conscious of the religious ^ ^ nature of the school and of the religious implications in much of the subject matter. (b) The addition of material of religious nature and value. \ (c) Specific religious instruction and training. 2. Discipline. (a) School government made democratic, — developing institutional loyalty. (b) Employment of moral and religious motives for work and behavior. (c) Punishment religious,— restoring broken spiritual unity. (i) Repentance. (2) ^Confession. (3) Consecration to the right. 3. Philanthropic enterprises. — Social service. II. Correlations and coordinations with the home. 1. Bringing home experiences into the school work. 2. Sending vital school work into the home. (a) Subject matter. (b) Discipline. (c) Social service. 3. Fellowship. ^ * (a) In the schools thru parfSJi^?' days, exhibits, etc. . * (b) In the home. (c) In joint projects in the community. III. Correlations and coordinations with the church. 1. Use of school materials in church. 2. Bringing of church materials and activities into the school. 3. Joint projects in the community. 4. Church supplements school work by religious examples and interpretation in com- munity standards and the fine arts. IV. Plan by grades. 1. Kindergarten. 2. Primary grades. 3. Grammar grades. 4. Intermediate high school. ^ 5. High school. V^. Conclusion. INTKODUCTION "Only the best is good enough for a child," said Goethe. Only the best is good enough for a developing democracy. The public schools have been established and are maintained in the interests of the individual child and of the nation. No good citizen would deny to any child the best and all of the best that the state can provide for the general welfare. If the fundamental needs of child life and development demand any good thing not now provided, those needs become educa- tional problems. Any general change in the aims, means, or methods in the public schools can only be brought about by convincing the general public that such change favors child development and the national life. Many of the best and most intellectual persons interested and active in pro- moting child welfare are continually insisting upon the need and importance of religious development in youth. If religion is an essential in the development of A T ' 'mi's life, itien it is an essential in education. If it is an essential in education. **' C( mes a public bchool problem because as society is now organized neither iiome nor- the church does or can provide a general education of any kln^Lj vlazzini defined democracy as "the progress of all thru all, under the leader- . Miiy of the wisest and the best." Burke had the same conception in mind when he described the ideal state as a "partnership of the dead, the living, and the yet 8 THE PliACE OF RELIGION IN EDUCATION to be born in all virtue, all science, and all art." The people of a democracy .'nust I be united in the solution of their fundamental national problems, and this unity ^ can be secured only thru schools supported and controlled by the state. The home is not the social center at present in America. In the olden time the family physician came to the home. The preacher or pastor did the same. The assessor and tax collector visited the home. Births, marriages, and deaths occurred in the home. Now most of these important functions are less social and more individual and private. Institutions and offices are provided for such needs. When children labored with their parents at home and jointly enjoyed the fruits of their labor, or suffered together in want and sorrow then the roots and trunks of a child's education grew up in the home. The public school needed only to j)rovide some branches, — reading, writing, and arithmetic, as the instruments of an enlarging social intercourse. The industrial revolution has removed the pro- ductive industries from the home, so that those who labor, or even those who seek the social service of the pTiysician, or pastor, or official must leave home. So, even if parents were qualified by training and disposition to give the instruction and training necessary for economic and social efficiency, and for good citizenship, they would be unable to do so because of this separation and lack of time. ^ The Church, as institutionalize*] into sectarian denominations, cannot be an instrument of general education in a democracy. From the standpoint of the indi- vidual, the church represents and expresses a personal preference. It must needs be so in the nature of the case in order to offer the stimulation and scope for an inspiring and vital fellowship, and in order to induce whole-hearted devotion and consecration. "With tastes there can be no argument." If a person likes the Episcopal Church, or the Methodist Episcopal Church, or the Roman Catholic Church, or the Jewish Church, that person likes that Church This choice is based upon a private, personal right. In matters of race, politics, and religion, the individual is prone to treat differences as fundamentals. The likenesses between a good specimen of the white race and a good specimen of the negro race are many more and much more fundamental than the differences; the same is true of the likenesses and differences between a good democrat and a good republican; between a good Roman Catholic and a good Protestant: but in fellowship and in behavior, most persons feel and emphasize the differences rather than the likenesses. In matters national, these differences are more or less incidental and negligible. From the standpoint of the general public, church preferences are principles of differentiation and not of unity. The separation, or rather differentiation, of the church and state is there- fore an absolute necessity in a democracy, but this differentiation doee not relieve either the church or the state of its functions and responsibilities. / The public schools must be public. They dare not admit those persona preferences that are made the differentiating principles of parties and sects. S( that if there are no religious impulses, principles, and practices other than thosi expressed thru denominational preferences and practices, then there is -no plac« for religious teaching in the schools of this democracy. On the other hand, if every normal child is essentially, or as Sabatier saic ^ "incurably" religious, if a child is hum.an by virtue of certain impulses to war better life, toward the more abundant life, then these essential, fundamental impulses must be recognized, employed, and developed in the child's educa^ A person who makes the sectarian or denominational differences fundaments ^ religion might admit the necessity of religious education but still logically cent that it is no function of the public school. There are still two solutions,— pi school teachers or special teachers of religion. The thesis set forth in the foU THE PLACE OF RELIGION IN EDUCATION 9 Ing argument is that, at its best, public school teaching must be and is inspiredr and guided by the religious motive, because of the nature of education, and that^ the general recognition of the religious implications of all good school work is the first step toward a more adequate religious development of all of the boys and girls of the nation. Method of Ai)i)roacli. — No citing of authorities or traditions can offer any solution of the problem. History can furnish no examples of how to introduce "religiotis teaching" into the schools of a modern democracy. Morals and religion cannot t\e introduced into education by legislation. The relation of religion and education is a problend of genetic psychology, to be solved by a careful study of human consciousness and the nature of human developmefit. The problem of improving the religious development of boys and girls by means of the public schools is "a problem of practical pedagogy to be solved by a careful analysis of the motives, means, and methods of teaching, instructing, and training. NATUKE OF EDUCATION Education is a life and a life-long process. "Life is the response to the order of nature." Life processes involve an agent and a situation, an organ and an environment. The development of the organ and the environment go hand in hand and are due to the responses or interactions of the two sets of forces. In the case of human beings the agent takes an interesting part in these responses. The unique thing about a person is that he does not accept passively the situation, but actively and deliberately sets about to perfect an idealized environment. This power to choose and execute a choice is the distinctive char- acteristic of intelligence. The power to make and execute a supreme choice by which to evaluate the world and thereby to direct behavior is the distinctively religious aspect of human consciousness. "■ Human environment is also unique. It also takes an interest in the develop- ment of the undeveloped. The older, wiser, better members of the species take pains to have the younger, developing members appropriate the achievements of the whole race. Genetically, education is the development of native, inherent germ principles or impulses. Socially, education is the process of grafting or budding social achievements and social forms upon these native impulses. Phases rf Human Life and Education. — Human life is so complex that it must be ai yzed into different a^ects or ph|ases in order to make the social process of touching economic and effective. These phases are, (a) Physical, (b) Mental, '-■ Moral, (d) Spiritual, (e) Religious. There are germinant principles of life USPS for all these phases. They are organically related, but no one can be i luted for any other. Physical development is of great importance to a ' lil i.uman development; but no amount of mere physical development develops a child s laQguage, or his manners, or his mc^rals. No amount of mere mental development will make a child religious. The normal development of a child irequi^'.s the unfolding of each set of germ principles. This is accomplished by social stimulus, guidance, and control of each set of specific impiTlses. For ,^xample, the development of the child's language power depends not alone upon Cie development of his eyes, ears, voice, and hands. These are mere tools, mere ^conveniences, not necessities. The child's language development requires the unfcidi./?-. "^ the native language impulses. Naturally, the child expresses inner Stat" (:' bciousness by hands and voice. Upon these native impulses may be grr. mguage form : English, French, vulgar, or pure. lO THE PLACE OF RELIGION IN EDUCATION Not all forces in the environment are equally powerful or equally valuable in stimulating the native impulses. Teaching consists essentially in selecting and employing the appropriate and effective ones. This must be done according to the law of life responses. Law of Life Responses.— A living organism is sensitive and responsive to the the kind or order of nature that gave it its birth and being; the fish is adapted to water, the bird to air, the eye to light, the lungs to air. A child is born by and into a social order". If a human child has a divine heredity, then it can be sensitive and responsive to this divine order. If there is no response of religious impulses to a religious order there can be no religious development. Life Formulas — 1. Physical life — response of the body to physical things. Examples — lyungs to air;' alimentary canal to food ; ear to sound ; eye to light. 2. Mental life — response of mind to mental things. Examples — Language impulses to language ; art impulses to music, painting, and literature. 3. Moral life — response of person to social order. Examples — Personal response to manners, customs, fashions, standards of conduct and behavior. 4. Spiritual life— response of the will to an ideal order. Example — A person trying to realize ideals. Planning to be, rather than to have. 5. Religious life — response of the soul to God. Example — The response of the whole being to the universal order. The attempt to find and found the life on eternal and universal personal principles. These phases are not isolated or separate. They may be arranged in an hierarchy as Browning so arranges them in the "Death in the Desert." "How divers persons witness in each man Three souls, which make up one soul ; first to wit, A soul of each and all the bodily parts. Seated therein, which works, and is what Does, And has the use of earth, and ends the man Downward ; but tending upward for advice, Grows into and again is grown into By the next soul, which, seated in the brain, Useth the first with its collected use. And feeleth, thinketh, is what Knows ; Which, duly tending upward in its turn. Grows into and again is grown into By the last soul, that useth both the first. Subsisting whether they assist or no. And, constituting man's self, is what Is. And leans upon the former, makes it play. As that played off the first ; and tending up. Holds, is upheld by, God, and ends the man Upward in the dread point of intercourse Nor needs a place, for it returns to Him, What Does, what Knows, what Is ; three souls, one man." What then, is the problem of education with respect to each of these aspects o: life? From the standpoint of the individual, education means the development ( each set of impulses in their right relation to each other. From the standpoi; of society, education means the selection and employment of the appropriat means of stimulation and nourishment for each phase of life in each stage o development from infancy to maturity. The teacher is the person who profestt the set purpose to represent society in the selection and employment of tl- appropriate means and method of education. The public school is society's attemp to make this educative process economic and efficient for all. The immediate agent of this individual and social process through the fellow ship of the teacher and the pupil is human consciousness. Education may then b^ described as the development and organization of personal consciousness, or sel^ THE PLACE OP RELIGION IN EDUCATION II consciousness thru fellowship. Human consciousness is not organized finally- until it grows into the sense of being a cause, of being creative. Human consciousness cannot be effectively productive or creative until it deliberately wills to be in active harmony with the whole universe. A human consciousness is never finally organized until dominated by eternal principles. Such a life is religious. Nature will bring hunger and the impulse to action above the threshold of consciousness. The child naturally seeks food and exercise. The parent, or some one in the parent's place, must select food and direct exercise if a normal physical develop- ment is secured. This is the problem of physical education. Similarly, curiosity, wonder, and the sense of logical agreement, will send the child for knowledge, but his search must be guided if the mind is to be normally developed. The social impulses will drive the child to select companions and comrades, but here also he must be guided. The normal child will have ideals and want to be. What and how to be is a problem of education. The Problem of Religious Education. — Are there in a normal child native impulses that are essentially religious, or that may be associated or identified with religious principles? Has society produced religious achievements and forms that ought to be grafted upon the religious impulses in order to favor the individual development and social progress? How is this teaching process to be accom- ' plished? Should it be done in the public schools? Phras