A MERICAN "= TEACHER MAY, 1919 SOME E LANA NAUMAN naman inn pa { Xs Our Friends Today = = - = = - = - Ss = 2 => => = = = = = => = = = = = = = = = Maryland Labor Convention Joint Industrial Councils From the Locals TTT Srv nn URMILA Democracy in Education Education for Democracy The American Teacher VNAVAARRRRSSSSSSSSSBSSsBSSsSssssssssss sss VESTS Is Teaching a Declining Trade? being women, as the majority of them are, they are far too modest. They seem to forget that they represent a high-grade class of brain workers. And they let everybody else forget it, too. They ought to keep us re- minded of all the geniuses and great leaders that have sprung from their ranks. Mary Wollstonecraft was a teacher; Margaret Fuller was a teacher ; Susan B. Anthony was a teacher. There is a list for TT trouble with teachers is that, you must solve the problem of how to b« a lady on $15 a week. “If one day you wish to marry, we shall be glad to accept your resignation on that day. We should much rather ex- change your experienced services foi those of a ‘green’ beginner than to hav. married women in the schoolroom. Other employers may strive to prevent a larg: labor turnover, but our aim is just the opposite.” — * * * But never be- ok == lieve that highe: women teachers to remember. For more than a hundred years teaching has been the chief career for women with brains. The fact that it is now so scandalously un- derpaid shows how much we value brains, in spite of all our pretenses. Teach- ing is no longer a profession; it is a sweated industry. To-day, if a bright, ambitious Editorials From the Locals CONTENTS Maryland State and District of Colum- bia Labor Convention Joint Industrial Council salaries alone will heal the breach already gap- ing so widely in the _ teachers’ ranks. Unless they also have a wotce —th -« women and the men, teachers to- gether, organized into a profession- al union—in de- termining th. conditions of their employ- ment, even bette) wages will be in vain. The world is learning to-day girl wishes to be- come a teacher, the Board of Education says to her something like this: “You are about to enter a time-honored and respected call- ing. It will give you a social standing that will make you feel superior to your sisters in ‘business.’ Hold hard to that feeling, for you will need all the consola- tion you can get out of it. You will be paid less than they, and you will have to make your money go further. Teachers must be ladylike in every respect, and by countless ex- amples that what the workers want is not alone a bet- ter wage, but to be valued as human beings should be valued—as person- alities with their own opinions and their own consciences. —Jeannette Rankin, in an Edi- torial in The New York Jour- nal of May 3, 1919. Vol. VIII, No. 5 The Americ Entered as second-class matter, Feb: = Published at 70 Fifth A 21, 191%, at the Post Office at New Yor! venue, New York, monthly, except July and August. an Teacher N. Y.; under the Act of March 8, 1879. Vol. VIII, No. 5 MAY, a Year 1919 One Dollar === New Locals for March and April HE new locals organized since the pub- T lication of the March number of THE AMERICAN TEACHER run from No 54 to 74. The organization of this number covers about six weeks of time. The locations of the locals are as follows: 54, Ardmore, Okla; 55, Cumberland, Md; 56, Kensington, Md; 57, Athens, O; 58, Philadelphia; 59, Minneapolis; 60, Denison, Texas; 61, San Francisco; 62, Royalton, Ill; 63, Austin, Texas ; 64, Galveston ; 65, Coalgate, Okla; 66, Boston; 67, San Antonio, Texas; 68, Ports- mouth, Va; 69, Granite City, Ill; 70, Mer- idian, Miss; 71, New York; 72, Fresno, Calif; 73, Linton, Ind; 74, Benicia, Calif. The names of these and their officers will be published with later news of locals organ- ized in the June number. The Committee on Educational Reconstruction ERTAIN of the locals of the American C Federation of Teachers in Washing- ton, Chicago and New York, have committees at work on a program of educa- tional reconstruction. It is the idea of the Executive Council that these committees shall merge their activities whenever they have gone far enough with their local work to justify undertaking the task on a national scale. Doubtless one of the first acts of the national committee when it is formed will be to ascertain whether there are any other locals that may be induced to enter the national field. The quickest way to have in- 99 formation of that kind known in useful quarters is to communicate with the Editor of THE AMERICAN TEACHER, who will convey the facts to persons interested. The point of view that is characteristic of the union movement among teachers must not go unexpressed. As in other particulars, no one will express this point of view if we do not. Furthermore, a national education bill will come up for consideration before the next Congress. If we are to have a consider- able hand in the construction and the promo- tion of this bill, immediate organization of this committee work is necessary. Our Friends|Today T has been the fortune of some locals of the American Federation of Teachers to begin their careers under the blue skies of general public approval. Members of the Board of Education, the Superintendent of Schools, and the important newspapers, have given their blessings to the infant local. Young things are always objects of approval, until they begin to grow teeth. Other locals seem to start under a spell of indifference, as if their genesis was attended by some form of unhallowed parentage. No one acknowledges them, except the warm heart of labor. Alone and unapproved by the formalist representatives of public education, and assaulted by the public press, their youth is characterized by a precocious shrewdness . and a spirit of independence which some- times make them seem unlovely as young things. But the enthrenched friends of today may not be the willing friends of tomorrow. The young unions grow, and they become power- 100 ful. They no longer are dependent on their patrons, and the patrons begin to see that their power over the young things has weak- ened. Quite. unrealized until too late, the enthrenched friends comprehend the fact that the growing power of the young local is a menace to the continuance of the control which was as natural as it was agreeable. Then without warning, the patronizing friends arise in their wrath, throw down ‘their masks of hypocrisy, put on their iron- barbed gloves, and smite the youthful and menacing power full in the face. The friends of today are no longer friends, but the young power finds in the outcast a brother. And both are the children of labor. On the Cooperation of Intelligence VERY organization of teachers by cus- 5 tom depends on the energy and devotion of a few persons. One of the penalties these few individuals pay for the privilege of giving their services is some- times an ungrateful charge of “autocracy,” of “forming a clique,” or of “getting their friends into the offices,” or of some other un- popular act. Aside from instances where there is ignorance of the principles of sound organization on the part of the officers, ac- cusations of favoritism are commonly due to the prevalence of “idle hands.” The best organizations of teachers are those which have a comprehensive program. One organized for the promotion of a salary cam- paign will cease to operate when the salary increase is attained, if such an event may oc- cur. But an organization that plans for the improvement of its working conditions, for the development of professional ideals, for the establishment of a modern course of study, for the correctiqn of systems of dis- cipline, etc., etc., as well as for salary in- creases, will have a program when the salaries are adjusted. And such an organiza- tion will have plenty for idle hands to do. The American Teacher Vol. VIII, No. 5 Among the idle hands is a group perhaps in every organization which is in possession of an uncommon amount of intelligence. They are capable of doing much, but they often choose to do nothing. They do not even find fault with those who do the work. They pay their dues with more or less regularity, and give their best out-of-school effort to certain avocations in which they sometimes appear to be more interested than they are in education. There are two things these able persons need. One is a keener conscience on the issue of how far it is right for them to accept the public trust of teaching, and then to neglect to give attention to ways of improving that service thru professional organizations, trusting sub-consciously that others will do that job for them. The other thing they need is a bit of professional discipline firmly ap- plied by those who have been doing all the professional work. Have you any such in your local? And have you planned to bring about the coopera- tion of their intelligence on a practical basis? ANNOUNCEMENT The symposium of newspaper editorials on teach- ers unions announced for this number must be post- poned on account of crowded columns. But it will surely appear in the June number. Other articles in that number will be an account of the splendid fight of the St Paul labor unions for salary increases for teachers, and an article on the Federal Em- ployees Union by a representative of that organiza- tion. Ge American Teacher Democracy in Education Education for Democracy Published monthly, except July and August by THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS at 70 Fifth Avenue, New York City HENRY R LINVILLE, Editor Max ROSENHAUS, Business Manager. At the time of expiration, a bill will be found in the copy. Subscribers are requested to give prompt notice of changes in address. Remittances should be made in postal money-order, express order, draft, stamps or check (New York cuianee: SUBSCRIPTION PRICE, ONE DOLLAR FOR THE YEAR— FOREIGN, $1.10. Maryland Stateand District of Columbia Labor Convention ELIZABETH A HAYDEN Grade Teachers Union of Washington, D C. HAT leaders of the organized labor T movement are deeply interested in se- curing the best educational opportu- nities for the children of all the people and also in the efforts of the organized teachers to gain freedom from economic oppression and autocratic control, was clearly shown during the deliberations of the Maryland State and District of Columbia Federation of Labor in Convention held at Lonaconing, Maryland, April 14-18, 1919. The report of the Committee on Education was unanimously adopted and other action taken by the Convention was convincing proof of labor’s recognition of the organized teach- ers as an important part of the labor move- ment. REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON EDUCA- TION — To the Delegates to the Maryland and District of Columbia Federation of Labor, in Con- vention assembled, at Lonaconing, Mary- land, this 16th day of April, 1919: Your Committee on Education reports fa- vorably upon the following RESOLUTIONS No 29: ; WORLD IDEALS To-day the world is looking forward to two things—the immediate achievement of a sat- isfactory peace and the gradual readjustment of life to a new body of ideals. The achieve- ment of the peace is the work of statesmen; the gradual readjustment of life to the new ideals which have come as the result of the war’s experience, is, however, the work of the peoples of the earth as a whole, especially of the rising generations. Tho a definition of these ideals is difficult, it is necessary to make one in order that we may know toward what end we are striving. We seek security from the woe of war with its destruction of wealth and manhood. We seek an appreciation of the principle of the unity and solidarity of the peoples of the earth, and of the worth and possibilities of each and every nation. We seek an equaliza- tion of opportunity for all—opportunity for gaining an adequate living, for attaining the worthy gifts of life, and for participating in the privilege of public service. We seek de- mocracy in industry as well as in government. The attainment of these ideals rests in part, we grant with a possible League of Nations, but in a vaster degree on a spirit of enlight- ened self-interest, of international under- standing, and good-will among the people of the earth. AMERICA’S CONTRIBUTION DEPENDS UPON HER PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM But where shall the nation get its spirit of enlightened self interest, its international understanding and its spirit of good-will toward all men, unless it be in our public schools ? The school is the laboratory of ideals. There, in large measure, the fruits of victory may be lost or won. America’s contribution to the realization of the world’s ideals will be determined by her public school system. Ed- ucation is no longer an exclusively local mat- ter. It is one of local, state, and national in- terest. In order that America’s contribution may be a worthy one, this country must have a comprehensive and nation-wide educational betterment program. She sacrificed men and money without stint to win the war. Now she must be at least willing to spend money in or- der that the fruits of the war may not be lost. England and France, in spite of enormous war-debts, are appropriating more than ever before for education. America must do as much; she cannot afford to do less. The sucess of our school system depends 101 102 The American Teacher very largely upon the school teachers of the country. We can have schools without build- ings; but we cannot have schools without school teachers. Their status is a matter of vital public concern. Even many of the so-called soulless corpo- rations realize their product depends fully as much upon the efficiency of the working per- sonnel as upon the effiicency of the plant. The product of our schools is human character. It follows then that the happiness, welfare, and efficiency of the teaching personnel are essen- tial to the success of our educational system. But the teachers of America to-day are sub- jected to a system of economic oppression and intellectual repression. The average salary of the teachers of Maryland, for example, is about $475 a year, or iess than that of the unskilled and illiterate laborers. We must realize also that democracy in government and in industry can never be fully attained unless there is democracy in education. The class-room teachers are the real educa- tors of the youth; yet they have little or no voice in the determination of text-books, of curricula, of educational policies, of wages or the conditions of their work. They impart ideas which too frequently are imposed upon them. There is little or no chance on their part for initiative, opportunity for develop- ment, nor encouragement for constructive work. They are too often under the domina- tion of reactionary, tyrannical or short-sight- ed school heads. More and more they are get- ting under the control of county rings, city machines, and corrupt financial interests, which, thru the instrumentality of an auto- cratic educational system, seek to control the thought of the teachers in order to control the thought of the youth of the country. In the future, unless-the organization of the schools is changed by an alert public, they will con- tinue to be used by those interests in this country which know full well that they can do much to obstruct the progress of democ- racy in government and in industry if they can prevent it in education. Autocracy will Vol. VIII, No. 5 make its final stand in the dominion of the minds of men. When the teacher is released from economic oppression and from autocratic control, then only can the youth of America be taught in the ways of free men; then only may we hope for full democracy in government and in in- dustry ; then only can America contribute as she should to the realization of the new ideals of the world. In view of these facts and principles, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Maryland and District of Columbia Federa- tion of Labor, in annual convention assem- bled, at Lonaconing, Maryland, this 16th day of April, 1919, goes on record as approving, and pledges its support to the following: First. In order to place our teachers upon a proper economic basis: 1. The enactment by the legislature of Maryland and by the Congress of the United States of statutes providing a $1,080 mini- mum annual salary for the public schoo! teachers of Maryland and of the District of Columbia, respectively ; 2. The passage by Congress of the United States of the Hollis Retirement Bill for the teachers of the District of Columbia. 3. The passage by the legislature of Mary- land of an adequate retirement and pension bill for the teachers of Maryland, which shall grant to such retired teachers a pension of at least $500 per year ; 4. The amendment of the school laws of Maryland so that teachers, when required to attend summer school, shall receive reim- bursement for not less than 75% of necessary expenses so entailed ; 5. The securing for the teachers of tenure of position during efficiency, and providing that there shall be no dismissals or suspen- sions without full and fair public hearings, at which the teacher shall have the privilege of being attended by friend and represented by counsel. Second. In order to promote the democ- ratization of our schools: 1. The full and unhampered right of the teachers of Maryland and the District of Co!- —wmwa ms ses Ss Oo wm SOS Ss ow So SS — = «fF oO May, 1919 umbia to organize and affiliate with the Amer- ican Federation of Labor ; 2. The adequate representation of labor upon all boards of education, whether elected or appointed ; 3. The appointment of a committee on ed- ucation by all local and central bodies affili- ated with this Federation; as well as by the Maryland and District of Columbia Federa- tion of Labor; 4. The official recognition by boards of edu- cation of advisory teachers councils, elected by the teachers, in order (a) that the teachers may have a voice in the determination of text books, curricula, school policies, their wages, and the conditions of their work; (b) that the needs of the children whom they teach may be fully presented; and (c) that the class- room teacher may the better train the youth in the ways of political and industrial democ- racy; 5. The passage of a law by the Congress of the United States providing for the election of the school board of the District of Colum- bia by the people themselves ; 6. The passage of legislation providing free text-books for the children of the District of Columbia, not only for the grades, as at present; but for the high schools as well, in order to promote equal educational opportu- nity for all the children of all the people ; 7. The wider use of school plants as centers of enlightenment, eduationally, industrially and economically for the betterment of the condition of the whole people in the com- munity to which the schools belong. The es- tablishment of night schools giving practical, helpful courses for the benefit of the many ambitious mechanics, tradesmen and workers who were compelled by economic need to leave school at an early age. The making of school libraries available to the whole community ; and the addition of such books as will give the worker a real opportunity to increase his knowledge industrially, economically and po- litically. 8. The consolidation of rural schools, wherever practicable ; 9. The adjustment, and if necessary the ex- pansion, of the curricula of our elementary The American Teacher 108 and secondary schools so that full opportunity for preparation in the callings of their choice may be offered the children of our people; the adjustment of such curricula to commun- ity need ; and the flexibility of such curricula so that transfers may be made by the student from one course to another upon good per- sonal or economic reason. 10. The enactment by the legislature of Maryland and by the Congress of the United States of more adequate physical education laws for the children of Maryland and of the District of Columbia, respectively ; 11. That adequate continuous dental and medical inspection and care be provided for all the children of the public schools of Mary- land and the District f Columbia. Third: The passage by the Congress of the United States of the Towner Educational Bill, H R 15400, or its equivalent, as described in the following extracts from a pamphlet re- cently published jointly by the American Federation of Labor, the American Federa- tion of Teachers, and the National Educa- tion Association: THE TOWNER EDUCATIONAL BILL, H R 15400, 65TH CONGRESS, THIRD SESSION Introduced by Congressman H M Towner, of Iowa, January 30, 1919, at the Request of the Amer- ican Federation of Labor, the American Fed- eration of Teachers, and the National Educa- tion Association. BRIEF ANALYSIS OF THE BILL Title: “A bill to create a Department of Educa- tion, to authorize appropriations for the conduct of said Department, to authorize the appropriation of money to encourage the states in the promotion and support of education and for other purposes.” ESTABLISHES A DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The bill establishes a Department of cae alee with a Secretary at its head, thus giving tion recognition in the President’s oe on with Agriculture, Commerce, Labor and the other Departments. At present the administration of educational affairs is parceled out among more than eighty different bureaus boards and divisions of the several Departments of Government. Bureau of Education in the Department of the Interior was established for the collection of stat- istics and the dissemination of information. CONSOLIDATES BUREAUS AND AUTHORIZES EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH The bill transfers the Bureau of Education to the Department of Education and authorizes the President to transfer such other educational bureaus, commissions boards, divisions and branches as, in his judgment, should be admin- istered by the Department of Education. It is The American Teacher made the specific duty of the Department to en- courage the states in the development of public educational facilities, and authorizes investi tion and research in the fields of illiteracy; im- migrant education; public school education, es- pecially rural education; physical and health edu- cation and recreation; preparation and supply of competent teachers; and such other fields as come within the provision of the Act. It author- izes the encouragement of higher and professional education, and the —— of educational at- taches to foreign embassies to investigate and re- port on the educational systems of other countries. AUTHORIZES APPROPRIATIONS FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES The bill authorizes the appropriation of $100,- 000,000 annually to be apportioned among the states for the following purposes: 1. To encourage the states in the removal of illiteracy, $7,500,000. 2. To encourage the states in the Americaniza- tion of foreigners, $7,500,000. 8. To encourage the states in the equalization of educational opportunities, and for the partial payment of teachers’ salaries, pro- viding better instruction, extending school terms and otherwise providing equally good schools for all children, $50,000,000. 4. To encourage the states in the promotion of physical and health education and recrea- tion, $20,000,000. 5. To encourage the states in providing facil- ities for preparing and supplying better teachers, $15,000,000. PRESERVES STATE AUTONOMY AND LOCAL CONTROL The appropriations are allotted to the states on condition that the state, or local authority, or both, shall furnish an equal amount for each specified purpose. The administration and con- trol of education is left entirely to the states, and to local authorities, the Federal Government ex- ercising supervision only to the extent necessary to see that the several amounts appropriated are used by the states for the purposes specified in the Act. The bill provides that the funds allotted to the several states shall be paid quarterly to the respective state treasurers, and disbursed on the order of the state’s chief educational author- ity, as designated by the state legislature. Fourth: The recognition of the principle that in order to keep the world safe for de- mocracy, the schools must be made safe for democracy. Resolved Further (1) that this Convention instruct its Legislative Committee to present to the next General Assembly of the State of Maryland, and to the next session of the Con- gress of the United States, the above pream- ble and resolutions, as a memorial from or- . ganized labor, and that they exert every le- gitimate effort to have appropriate legislation enacted; and (2) That this Convention instruct its ex- ecutive Committee to print enough copies of Vol. VIII, No. 5 the above preamble and resolutions for, and to send one to, each teacher in Maryland and the District of Columbia, and one to each io- cal affiliated with the Maryland and District of Columbia Federation of Labor. Respectfully submitted, HAROLD E WARNER, Chairman. High School Teachers Union of Washington, D C. ELIZABETH A HAYDEN, Secretary. Grade Teachers Union of Washington, D C. GILBERT C COOLING, Allegany County Teachers Union, Maryland. A B BOUGHTON, Allegany County Teachers Union, Maryland. B W PAYNE, Federal Employees Union No 2 of Washington, D C. Immediately after the reading, by Mr Payne, of the report of the Committee on Education, Mr Warner, Chairman ‘of the Committee obtained the floor and spoke as follows: Mr Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Convention: The present nation-wide movement in the di- rection of educational reconstruction, is, as you know, a direct outcome of the war. The war revealed to us certain shocking conditions in our national life. For example, as a result of the draft, we learned that there are 700,000 young men in this country, between the ages of 21 and 31, who cannot read or write a word in any language. During the earlier part of our participation in the great war, some 200,000 of these illiterate young men were sent across to fight the battle of democracy. And one of these illiterate dough- boys having learned to write a little in a Y M C A hut wrote home: “Ain’t it a shame to send us illiterate Americans up against them educated Germans.” It would have been a shame; and no- body knew it better than General Pershing, who shortly thereafter wired back to Washington to know whether the authorities there thought that he was conducting a war or running an asylum for the feeble-minded! I may say that very soon after this, a Depart- ment of psychology was formed under the War May, 1919 Department, headed by Major Terman, formerly Professor of Education in the University of Cali- fornia, and from this time on none were sent across seas except those who had had sufficient education to enable them to meet the require- ments of modern warfare. Another thing revealed by the war was the shocking effect of our failure to properly as- similate and educate foreigners in our American ways and language. Why we find that there are today 10,000,000 men, women, and children in the United States, including the illiterates, who can- not read or write the English language. Think of it, 10,000,000 persons who, if they could be here in this convention today, could not under- stand a word that is said here, or read a word of the reports of what is done here! Lastly, the physical health condition of our young people, as revealed by the war is amazing. Over 700,000 of the young men, between the ages of 21 and 31, called before our draft boards, had to be rejected from military service because of physical infirmity. Think of that—physical infirmity. Why two years ago, when we used the word physical infirmity, we used to think of an old people’s home; and yet today we know that in this connection we must think of the supposed flower of American young manhood! Now, my friends, what is the cause of these terrible national weaknesses which have required a world war to be revealed to us? The cause must be sought, largely, in our educational sys- tem, for we know that it is during the period of legal infancy—that is, between birth and 18 or 21—that reading and writing may be best taught, health built up, and American principles and ideals be instilled. When we investigate closely our educational system, we do indeed find conditions which cause us to wonder. For example, we find the Amer- ican teacher working under conditions of economic oppression and intellectual despotism that beggar description. Consider the matter of teachers’ salaries. The average salary of the American teacher all over the country is around $500 per year. In Baltimore they have a very beautiful pub- lic park, called Druid Hill Park; and in that park, among other things, they have a cage filled with monkeys; and the people of Baltimore think so much of those monkeys that they have to have a keeper for them; and so they pay a man $960 a year to look after the moral and physical and spiritual welfare of those monkeys, which is just double the salary that they pay to certain of the Baltimore teachers for attempting to guide the destinies of the future men and women of Bal- timore! The American Teacher ; 105 In one of our Southern states, according to a report of the Russel Sage foundation, they pay certain convicts, sent out to work upon the roads, more money per day than they pay their elemen- tary school teachers! Now let me call your attention to a quotation from an article that appeared in The Bankers’ Magazine for January, contrasting the school teacher with the unskilled laborer. The writer says: “We pay the American unskilled laborer more than we pay the teacher, because he is worth more. He makes a larger contribution to the welfare of society.” Now I do not quote this for the purpose of comparing here the relative worth of the teacher and the unskilled laborer. I believe that any man who does an honest day’s work, regardless of his position in the economic scale is the equal of any other man. But I make this quotation merely that I may call your attention to the fact that at last the teachers of America are beginning to get wise to some things. We are just beginning to know that the sudden interest of the banker in the worth of the unskilled laborer is not due to the intrinsic value of the laborer’s services; but to the fact that the laborer is af- filiated with, and has the backing of, The Amer- ican Federation of Labor! Delegates of the convention, we teachers do not come before you today to teach you anything. We get enough of teaching in the class room. But we come here to lay before you our needs and wishes, as embodied in the resolutions now before you, and to ask you to tell us what’s the matter with them. If you pass these resolutions today, you will, of course, do a great thing for the American teacher; but you will do more than this. During the past two years the union organizations of teachers have grown from nothing to over 60 local bodies, affiliated with the American Fed- eration of Labor, you will add a tremendous im- petus to the organization of the teachers thru- out the state and nation, which, we trust, will be a thing of mutual value. One more sentence and I have finished. The resolutions now before you comprise, we believe, one of the most sane and progressive educational programs ever laid before the people of a state, and if they are passed today, I confess to you that it is with a feeling of great pride that we shall return to our homes and say to the educators there—“See, while you have been discussing edu- cational reconstruction in the peaceful seclusion of the academic cloister, the labor men and women of the State of Maryland and the District of Columbia have been busy and transformed ideas into action!” 106 Other representatives of the teachers made strong statements in support of the report which was finally unanimously adopted by the Convention. -Among other evidences of the keen intelli- gent interest with which organized labor in this section of the country is following the interests of the teachers was the introduc- tion of a strong resolution relative to the now celebrated Wood case by Delegate Nolda ‘of the Central Labor Union of Washington, The American Teacher Vol. VIII, No. 5 D C. This resolution was also passed unan- imously.- The Central Labor Union of Wash- ington has on all occasions given its instinted financial and moral support to tre interests of the teachers and schools. Teach- ers of Maryland and the District of Colum}-ia having received such substantial proofs of the backing of the entire labor movement of this section of the country should be able to report at the next annual convention a hundred per cent organization. Joint Industrial Council of Bradford (England) City Corporation and Its Employees (From the Monthly Labor Review of the U S Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, April, 1919) Whitley committee for the establish- ment of joint industrial councils, the Bradford (England) City Council has or- ganized a joint consultative board of the cor- poration and its employees to consider at regular intervals questions of wages, rates of pay, hours, and working conditions, and to take necessary steps to prevent the differences and misunderstandings between the corpora- tion and its employees, according to informa- tion from the United States consul at Bradford under date of January 16, 1919. The corporation, continues the consul, is the largest employer of labor in the city, having nearly 7000 employees, such as school teach- ers, clerks, etc, and employees in the various public services, such as tramways, and the municipal gas, electricity, and water works, etc. The board will consist of 32 members, one- half appointed by the corporation, and the other half by the respective sections or groups of employees. The scheme will not in any jway interfere with the liberties of the cor- -poration on the one hand or the rights of the ‘anions on the other. The board will represent ‘all sections of the employees, and the unions ‘will, as heretofore, have full power to ap- proach the respective committees of the cor- r line with the recommendations of the poration upon any matters they desire to bring forward. National industrial councils are in process of formation for most industries, including tramways, gas, water, and electricity, while the National council for all employees of local authorities other than the four large trading undertakings above mentioned has been for- mulated by a drafting committee from the large municipal associations on the one hand and representatives of 12 large trade-unions on the other. The Bradford local board was formed after consultation with the Minister of Labor. Already it is stated, other munici- palities are considering the formation of similar local boards. In a printed copy of the draft scheme which has been received by this bureau the functions of the board are stated to be— to secure the largest possible measure of joint action between the corporation and its employees for the development of the various services of the corporation and for the improvement of the conditions of all engaged therein. Among its more specific objects are the . following: To provide, in respect of the services con- cerned, for (a) The consideration at regular interval: of wages and rates of pay, hours, and working «07- ditions (including the method of adjustment of earnings to actual or anticipated new conditions). May, 1919 (b) The consideration from time to time of such matters as sickness and accident pay, com- pensation and unemployment and underemploy- ment pay. To take such action as it may deem necessary or desirable to prevent differences and misunder- standings between the corporation and its em- ployees. The immediate consideration of any differences between any parties and sections in the corpora- tion service, and the establishment of any neces- sary machinery for this purpose with the object of securing the speedy settlement of the differ- ences. The collection of statistics and information, as and when agreed upon, on matters appertaining to the services concerned. The encouragement of the study of processes and design and of research with a view to per- fecting the services concerned. The provision of facilities for the full consid- eration and utilization of inventions and improve- ments in machinery or method, and for the adequate’ safeguarding of the rights of the de- signer of such improvement, and to secure that such invention and improvement in machinery or method shall give to every person concerned an equitable share of the benefits, financial or other. Inquiries into the special problems of the serv- ices concerned, including the comparative study of the organization and methods of the services in this and other countries, and where desirable the publication of reports. The consideration of the means to secure that the employees shall have a greater share in and responsibility for the determination and observ- ance of the conditions under which they carry on their work in so far as it affects the health (in- cluding housing) of workers employed in the serv- ices concerned, with a view to improvement, and the provision for special health treatment where necessary for workers in the services concerned. To provide the best means of securing (1) the observance by the corporation and its employees of the decisions and agreements mutually arrived at by their representatives; (2) the greatest pos- sible security and continuity of employment. The consideration of any proposed general leg- islation affecting corporation employees and rep- resentation of the needs and wishes of the board to Parliament or Government departments thru the city council. The consideration of arrangements for the su- pervision of the entrance into and training for the various services of the corporation and co- operation with education authorities in arranging education in all its branches for such services. The American Teacher 107 The consideration of measures for securing the inclusion of all work people in such services in their appropriate trade unions or associations. To take steps to provide that the board either directly or thru its subcommittees, shall be the “works committee” under any national industrial council which covers any services of the corpora- tion. N U T EXECUTIVE ELECTION, 1919 (Division 10) If you want a man with a program and a record of hard and successful work for Teachers, VOTE FOR G D BELL PROGRAM. A new and better scale of salaries for London. War bonus to be made permanent. A Whitley ‘Committee for London. Decentralisation of Union work. Direct Teacher Representation on all Education Authorities. More Parliamentary Representation. One Union for all Teachers. Elimination of the Unqualified Teacher. —Advertioonent in The London Teacher of March 21, 191 This advertisement of a candidate for office in The National Union of Teachers of Eng- land will interest our members.—EDITOR. LONDON CORRESPONDENCE In a competition for the best collection of “how- lers,” which was recently arranged by the University Correspondent, the following gems were received: Martin Luther was nailed to the church door of Wittenberg for selling papal indulgences. Chicago is a large town at the bottom of Lake Michigan. Ben Johnson survived Shakespeare in some re- spects. The Habeas Corpus Act was that a man couldn’t be kept in prison against his will. One of the fe old Roman roads is called The Milky Way “liver Twist” was written by Nicholas Nickleby. A monsoon is an animal which eats snakes. The Conventicle Act was that no man attending a SS within five miles of his house should be a sc seenmnaties vom a which are equal to each other are equal wo “4 Montfort formed what was known as the Mad Parliament—it was something the same as as is at the present day. Me ia halen cur lo frent—Ghe loweved him en.to hie head. The Anzacs are a race of South American savages. A. schoolmaster leads a sedimentary life—Chrie.. tian Science Monitor of February 28, 1919. From the Locals of the American Federation of Teachers Staff of Chairmen of Press Committees Local No. 3, Chicago, Ill, Eruer E Beers Local No. 5, New York, N Y, Witmer T STONE Local No. 8, Washington, D C, SUSANNE ULRICH Local No. 16, Washington, D C, GERTRUDE L. LADSON. Local No. 25, Norfolk, Va, Jutian S. Hucu- SON Note: The names of the Chairmen of other Press Committees will be added as they are re- ceived from the locals. EXTRACTS FROM SECRETARY STECK- ER’S APRIL LETTER TO THE FINANCIAL SECRETARIES the Executive Council and officers in- formed as to activities, difficulties and successes of the locals. Some secretaries send in special reports, some make a brief statement along with the monthly report and EK VERY means should be used to keep many give no indication of conditions. Some secretaries are not yet aware how much de- pends upon them in forming the closer relations between the local and national or- ganizations. The mail during the past month has been very interesting. I can mention only a few cases. The Madison Federation No 35 as- sisted a Citizens’ Committee in selecting the candidates for their Board of Education and then helped elect them on a Non-partisan ticket. The report which had been made re- garding the salaries of the teachers in com- parison with other wages roused public opinion in Madison to such an extent that the old Board at its last meeting raised the salaries about $150, an unprecedented amount for Madison. Several other locals are conducting a salary campaign the results of which have not yet been reported. The Sit Paul Women’s Federation, No 28, feels ver) well satisfied with the progress made in the few months of organization. Their report will appear in the June number of THE AMERICAN TEACHER. The New Orleans Trades Council welcomed the delegates of Local No 36 and the President was made delegate to the Louisiana State Federation of Labor Convention, and the latter honored the teachers of New Orleans in spite of the re- centness of the affiliation, by electing Miss Aurianne a Vice-president and member of the Executive Board of the State Federation of Labor. The Sacramento locals are doing ex- cellent work in reaching the teachers of the state who visit the capital for legislative purposes. There are six live locals in Cali- fornia. ‘There are other interesting items. Let us know your story. NEW YORK AND WASHINGTON (TWO HANDS CLASPED) NO TEARS, ONLY Joy! From Local No. 5. (The Teachers Union, New York) FREEDOM AND INITIATIVE IN THE SCHOOLS ¢ a0 REEDOM and Initiative in the Schools” was the subject of dis- cussion at the meeting held by the Public Education Association of New York, on April 26, 1919, at Hotel McAlpin. Those taking part in the discussion were Dr John L Tildsley, Associate Superintendent of Schools, of New York, Prof George D Stray- er, President of the National Education Association, Prof Zechariah Chaffee, of the Harvard Law School, and Mr Henry R Lin- 108 May, 1919 ville, President of the Teachers Union, New York. The addresses are being published separ- ately by the Public Education Association, 8 West 40th St, New York. A fair account of the discussion was printed in the New York Times, of Sunday, April 27, 1919. The outcome of the discussion was on the whole favorable to the liberal opinion ex- piessed at the conference. The President of the Teachers Union has received from a professor in Clark University, Worcester, Mass, the following note: “If your opinion of the relation of the administrative control of the New York City schools to the forces of reaction and obscuranticism was correctly reported in last Sunday’s Times, I want to extend my hearty approval of your arraign- ment, which I believe to have been no less accurate than courageous. If the reac- tionaries can be kept from getting en- trenched during this period of patriotic fervor, which they are capitalizing for quite different ends, I believe the outlook for liber- alism is not without some promise.” SIGNED BY MEMBERS Stand-by-the-Union Pledge 1. We reiterate our condemnation of any efforts of the school officials to prevent us from being ad- dressed by speakers of our own choosing. 9 2. We reiterate our right to criticise the school syllabus. 3. We reiterate our right to criticise the actions of school officials. 4. We maintain that the charge of tyranny and oppression by the school officials is supported by the very action contemplated against the Union and its officers. 5. We pledge ourselves to give moral and all other effective means of support to the officers of the Teachers Union. 6. We assume equal responsibility with them for the holding of the meeting of the Teachers Union on March 29, 1919, in Public School 27, Man- hattan. 7. We reiterate our belief in the American Con- stitution, including the guarantee of free speech, and we believe that the Constitution applies to teachers as well as to other American citizens. The American Teacher 109 8. If the exercise of these rights has become an offense, we too are offenders. 9. If our officers must be punished, we too must be punished. 10. We are determined to continue to exercise the freedom of speech and of thought that the Con- stitution established for us. WAR ON TEACHERS’ UNION The Board of Education has denied the use of public school buildings for meetings of the Teachers Union, and a second resolution outlawing the organ- ization was sidetracked for the time being when the president suggested the impropriety of being “at once investigators, jury and judge in this case.’ The board’s edict was instigated by a report of a meeting of the Teachers Union in. which free s h and the rights of teachers were discussed. This in- subordination was bad enough, but it was claimed that the teachers had declared that members of the board of education were desirous “of suppressing the rights of both teachers and pupils.” Behind the board’s opposition, however, is the out- standing fact that the teachers, thru organization, are acquiring independence and no longer refuse to look upon members of the board as tin gods.— From A F of L Weekly Newsletter of April 12, 1919. HELP WANTED At a meeting of the Teachers Union, according to a report laid before the New York City Board of Education, “the Board was represented as tyrants, oppressors, a privileged class, desirous of suppress- ing the rights of both teachers and pupils.” If there is still anybody in New York who doubts the sub- stantial validity of the indictment, he has only to read the press accounts of the proceedings of the board on April 7, to have all his doubts removed. The board empowered Superintendent Ettinger to in- stitute an immediate and exhaustive investigation into the life, affiliations, opinions and loyalty of every member of the union. If any union-breaking private corporation possesses a more effective instrument of oppression, the Board of Education would like to know about it—From The New Republic of April 12, 1919. TEACHERS CALL BLUFF President Somers, of the Board of Education, de- fends the beard’s opposition to the Teachers Union on the ground that it has published “treasonable literature.” This attempt to create a hostile senti- ment against the teachers is met by Dr Henry R Linville president of the union, who calls on Mr Somers to produce the literature. “The teachers are fighting not only against au- tocracy in the educational system,” said President Linville, “but ow are also fighting against dis- honesty.”—From The A F of L Newsletter of April 19, 1919. 110 | MUST WE REPEAT THE. RACE EXPERIENCE? What strange obsession afflicts school boards that they should be so different from other public bodies? Why should they be among the worst of employers? Why should they forever be quarreling with their employees? There was a time when employers de- nied their men the right of organization, and re- fused to see committees representing them. They arrogantly declared they would run their own busi- ness as they saw fit. But that is a thing of the past. Few employers now hold out against the demand for collective bargaining; few, that is, aside from school boards. These august bodies, presum- ably public servants, exclude teachers from any part in the management of education. If protest is made the objectors are investigated to see if they are traitors or have Bolshevist tendencies. Political democracy is recognized, and industrial democracy is rapidly growing. But there must, if we would heed the school boards, be no democracy in educa- tion. What nonsense is this? Upon what meat do these men feed that they are grown so great? Must the school teachers go thru the long struggle that has marked the advance of organized labor in order to secure simple justice?—From The Public of April 19, 1919. NEAR OUTLAWS The Board of Education in New York City, which is not familiar with current tendencies in this coun- try and abroad, has forbidden the Teachers Union to assemble in the city’s schools. A remark by Presi- dent Somers that “we cannot be at once investigat- ors, jury and judge in this case” prevented the Board from adopting a second resolution condemn- ing and outlawing the teachers organization. But the first amazing proposal went thru swimmingly.— From The New Republic of April 26, 1919. THE. PRESENT CRISIS . The privilege of using school buildings for meet- ings is still withheld from Local No 5, New York, on the ground that the Union has criticised the Board of Education. The Glassberg trial was finished on Friday, May 9, 1919, with a splendid summing up by the counsel of the Union, Mr Gilbert E Roe, of New York. The decision of the Board has not yet been rendered, but the clear indication as expressed by President Somers is that the Board considers itself justified in examin- ing into the private political and social views of teachers. The Teachers Union denies the validity of this position. The American Teacher Vol. VIII, No. 5 From Local No. 8 (The High School Teachers Union, Washington, D C) Extracts From “DISCIPLINE OF TEACHERS FOR ‘HER- ESIES’ IN THE WASHINGTON, (D C) PUBLIC SCHOOLS THE CASE OF MIss ALICE Woop” COMPILED BY THE HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS UNION AND THE GRADE TEACHERS UNION OF WASHINGTON, D C EXCERPTS FROM THE ORGANIC LAW Public Act No 254; Approved, June 20, 1906 Sec 10. When a teacher is on trial or being in- vestigated he or she shall have the right to be at- tended by counsel and by at least one friend of his or her selection. Sec 2. The organization meeting [of the Board of Education], and all meetings whatsoever there- after, shall be open to the public, except committee meetings dealing with the appointment of teachers. EXCERPTS FROM THE RULES ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF EDUCATION 72. These rules are adopted in explanation and furtherance of Section 10 of the Act of June 20, 1906. “Being investigated,” as mentioned in Section 10, shall refer to an investigation made by the board, or a proper committee thereof, or by some officer or other person acting under “authority of the board or such committee.” The right of attendance of counsel and friend sha! be construed to exist at the first stage of the in- vestigation or trial at which the party involved is formally accused. Procedure of trial shall be as follows: The charges preferred shall be put in writing, signed by the person making the complaint, and countersigned by the superintendent. Each charge shall be specifically set forth with due regard to the time, place and character thereof. To the complaint shall be appended an order signed by the president of the board directing the party accused to appear before the board for trial or in- vestigation, at a meeting to take place not less than five days, exclusive of Sundays, after the day of the service of copy of complaint on the person ac- cused..... 70. The violation of any of the rules of the Bord of Education; disobedience or neglect of the orders of those in authority; any other offenses against morality or good order; or inability to perform s+t- May, 1919 isfactorily the duties of his position on the part of any employee of the board, shall be, any or all of them, considered cause for suspension by the Presi- dent of the Board of Education, or dismissal by the poard. The suspension of any employee shall extend only to the next meeting, regular or special, of the Board of Education, unless otherwise ordered by the board. AN OUTLINE OF MISS WOOD'S HISTORY OF THE CASE 1. On February 14, 1919, Dr E S Newton, Prin- cipal of the Western High School, handed me a letter, signed by two parents, Mr Frank P Reeside and Mr Thomas Bradley, quoting indirectly and protesting against various remarks, especially those on the subject of Bolshevism, made by me in an English class. 2. I answered the letter, explaining the occasion of the remarks, assuring the gentlemen of my patri- otism, and explaining my aims in teaching. I also assured Dr Newton that if the Board so desired I would not permit the discussion of any topics they cared to ban. 3. No suggestions, however, came from them. 4. On March 12, I was called to the telephone and asked by Mr Thurston to meet him and two members of the board in an informal conference which was held March 17, 5. Before going I inquired thru a friend whether it was to be in the nature of a trial. and was def- initely informed by Mr Thurston that it was not, but was merely a friendly conference for which no counsel was needed. 6. I asked Dr Newton as my principal to accom- pany me to the conference. We met in Mr Thurs- ton’s office, the others present being Mrs Gerry, Mr Learned and Mr Thurston. 7. Thruout the meeting the atmosphere was in- formal and friendly. No charges were preferred and no reference was made to the letter from the parents. Mr Learned as chairman questioned me in a courteous and friendly manner as to my educa- tion and training and discussed with me my views on certain questions of economics and ethics. 8. The conference ended with the expressed opin- ion of the committee (who, however, had not con- ferred during the meeting) that I had committed an indiscretion in discussing these economic and so- cial subjects in class. I had previously stated that I would obey any direction given me that such sub- jects should not be discussed. Dr Newton and I withdrew under the impression that the incident was closed. 9. On Thursday morning the papers had in large headlines the news that I had been suspended as unpatriotic, with various false statements in the stories. ; 10. Later, Mr Kramer informed me by telephone that I was suspended for one week without pay. The American Teacher 111 11. No reason was given. 12. On Thursday evening I found at my home a letter from Mr Thurston giving the reason for my: suspension, “an attempt to touch on and in- terpret certain economic and social subjects in which you were clearly an amateur.” FURTHER STEPS IN THE CASE 1. After hearing the full statement by Miss Wood, above summarized, the Executive Committees of the High School Teachers Union and Grade Teachers Union under date of March 22, addressed a letter of inquiry to the Board of Education asking for in- formation as to the specific charges against Miss Wood and the method of procedure with reference to her suspension. At a four-hour session of the joint committees held on this date Mr Paul E Lesh, of the firm of Wilson, Huidekoper & Lesh, was re- tained as counsel. He advised the committees at this meeting before further action was taken, and has since been in daily conference with the officers. 2. The President of the Board of Education in his reply to this letter of inquiry stated “that the Board’s action in the premises is not the proper sub- ject of interrogation or review by other teachers or groups of teachers,” furthermore that the grounds for the board’s action had been sufficiently explained in the letter of the superintendent notifying Miss Wood of her suspension. 8. On March 31, at called meetings of the High School Teachers Union and The Grade Teachers Union, the above facts were presented and resolu- tions were unanimously adopted, (a) protesting the suspension of Miss Wood, and asking the Board to rescind its action in her case, and (b) asking for a public hearing in order to make plain the position of the Unions in this matter and to discuss the general status of teachers in the Washington Publie Schools. SUMMARY OF ISSUES Inasmuch as the Board of Education is supreme in “questions of general policy” affecting the public schools of Washington, and no appeal lies from its decision on such questions except to public opinion, we submit to public opinion these inquries: Is it for the good of the schools, pupils and pub- lic— (1) That a teacher should be disciplined by a suspension for one week without pay? A teacher is in a position requiring the exercise of authority and the enforcement of discipline over her pupils; punishment or humiliation known to her pupils lessens her efficiency as a teacher. Are the same methods ‘of discipline appropriate to her as to an operative employee? Does discipline by suspension improve her teaching? Does it improve her rela- tions with her pupils? Does it improve the morale of other teachers? 112 (2) That the Board should punish teachers for assuming to discuss with pupils subjects clearly within the general scope of courses which they have been directed by their superiors to teach, upon the ground that the Board considers them to have been incapable of discussing the subjects in question? (3) That teachers assigned teach economic, indus- trial and social subjects should be restrained from freedom of expression by fear of discipline should their views not be approved by the members of the Board whose views and desires have not been made known to the teachers? *(4) That “bolshevism and similar heresies,” to use the Superintendent’s phrase, should be excluded from discussion by trained teachers, with pupils of an average age of sixteen to eighteen years, for whose intelligent understanding of government, eco- nomics and current events the teachers are respon- sible? *(5) That “bolshevism and similar heresies” should find here in America the unfairly fertile field that ignorance on the part of our future citizens can alone prepare? *(6) That the teachers of such pupils should fear to aid them to an understanding of social and politi- -cal doctrines and practices different from or even inimical to our own, as though knowledge of them would not lead the product of the American public school the more to cherish and enable him the better to preserve and defend the heritage of our insti- tutions? (7) That the views of the heads of departments (of instruction, such as English, History, Mathe- matics, ete.) and of principals of schools, should be ignored by the Board in appraising the work of teachers? (8) That the views of a few (perhaps two or perhaps three) of many parents founded upon in- formation from a few of many pupils should be accepted by the Board, without a hearing, and the action adhered to by the Board in the face of a positive denial from the teacher presented and sup- ported by the unanimous action of the Teachers Unions? (9) That a teacher should be disciplined— (a) Upon a matter complained about by two or three parents upon information derived from chil- dren whose immaturity formed an element in the complaint; (b) Upon verbal information communicated to the Board in secret session by one of two Board members (who had with the Supernitendent and her principal so conferred with her in an “informal estions (4), (5), amd (6) are not essential to Miss Ww s case; she has been at all times willing to obey the directions of the fh. and has not raised the question of the wisdom of the direction when given. Her complaint in this respect is that no directions had given when her supposed -offense was commi The American Teacher Vol. VIII, No. 5 friendly conference” as to leave her under the im pression that the matter discussed was to be dropped) and (c) Upon the motion of an influential member of the Board who never saw her and who was a close business associate of two complaining parents, sec- onded by a member who never saw her and hai no information other than that derived as above stated? (10) That the Board of Education, directed by law to meet in public should so abuse the privilege of prior conference (assuming that as claimed by the Board the privilege exists) that a matter in which the public is so vitally interested as the application of the Unions for a hearing this mat- ter, should be disposed of without announcement other than that a reply would be sent, in a Board meeting scheduled for 4:30 P. M., and taking place from approximately 6:05 to 6:20 P. M., preceded by a secret conference lasting from 3:30 to 6:00 P. M.? To the Courts of the District of Columbia, we shall, if it becomes necessary, submit the more nar- row issues which we are advised are within their jurisdiction, probably the following: (1) Has the Board of Education the power to fine a teacher by depriving her of her salary for a stated period as a measure of discipline, or is the disciplinary power confined to separation from the service? (2) Has the Board of Education the power to discipline a teacher for the reasons } assigned in Miss Wood’s case? (3) Has the Board of Education power to in- vestigate and act upon charges against a teacher by “informal inquiry” without giving to the teacher a trial or investigation in the mode prescribed in the Organic Act and in ts own rule, and in fact, without any restriction whatever as to procedure or formality? ALICE DEAL, President, High School Teachers Union. CLARA K. STUTZ, President, Grade Teachers Union. PAUL E. LESH, Counsel. AFTER ALL, CZARS DO LOVE ONE ANOTHER In Washington the teachers’ unions have enga: red counsel and are peegering to to fight in the courts ‘he case of Miss Alice Wood, who was suspended from her duties as a teacher because, in answer tc a question, she said that she’ thou ht “the Soviet Gov- ernment in Russia was better or Russia than was the absolutism of the Czar.”—From The Public of April 12, 1919. May, 1919 “OTHER HERESIES” The old subject of free speech, at an amazing new angle, has been brought up to the country by the ingenuity of the Board of Education of Wash- ington, D C. The educational authorities of the national capital have forbidden the teachers of cur- rent events in the city’s high school to discuss the following subjects: 1. Bolshevism. 2. The League of Nations. 3. “ Other heresies.” President Wilson will be greatly interested when he returns. The incident began with an inquiry propounded to a teacher in the Washington Western High School by an extremely inquiring student. This student wanted to know if Bolshevists were anarchists. The teacher thereupon explained the difference between Bolshevists and anarchists and recounted the strug- gle between the two groups in Russia. She displayed a most creditable and even curious amount of knowl- edge. Few people in all America seem to know that the anarchists fought the Bolshevists and contended with them violently for the mastery of Russia. This teacher knew it. Her name is Alice Wood. The inquiring student went on then apparently with his inquiries, and Miss Wood is reported to have made two statements, one of which she admits and the other of which she utterly denies. Both her admission and her denial might seem to be entitled to full credence; because the only listeners to her remarks were children whose testimony on matters so controversial and intricate would naturally be presumed in any court to be inadequate. The remark she admits making was this: that the Soviet form of election is a form suiting the history and temperament of Russia and accordingly prob- ably good for Russia. It will be noticed that she spoke here of the Soviet form, of the Soviet frame- work, and not of the Bolshevist party. The remark she denies making was this: that the Soviet form of election is a better form than the American form. A few weeks later the Superintendent of Schools, acting for the Board of Education, sent her a letter in which there are two passages which cannot be read too often. They repay repeated study. After informing Miss Wood that she was sus- pended for a week without pay, the letter goes on: “The board took this action because of your at- tempt to touch on and interpret certain economic and social subjects in which you were clearly an amateur.” Miss Wood was an amateur in Bolshevism. Yet she had discussed Bolshevism. In doing so, she was wrong—according to the board. But she was re- quired to teach current events. As a teacher of English she was under orders to teach current events. The American Teacher 118 Washington teachers of English and of current events. The world is every day producing a large number of events in Railroad Regulation, Tariff, Federal Farm Loans, Bubonic Plague, the Mainte- nance of Resale Prices, Single Tax, Vers Libre, the Dalmatian Coast, the American Merchant Marine and the Ponderability of Light. Hereafter, accord- ing to the Board of Education of Washington, D C, the teachers of English who teach current events in the Washington high schools must not discuss any of these subjects unless they are experts in them. It raised a difficulty. The superintendent therefore went on to solve the difficulty. He essentially divided all subjects into two classes. In the first class apparently, the teacher did not need to be an expert. The subjects in that class she might discuss freely. The names of these subjects are to be deduced from their omis- sion from mention in the second class. The second class is entirely different from the first class. A teacher must not discuss the subjects in the second class, no matter how expert she may be in them. The superintendent points out the second class and defines it in the second memorable passage in his letter. He tells Miss Wood that when she returns to teaching after her week’s suspension she must refrain from “touching upon” certain subjects. One must notice she is not ordered to refrain from ad- vocating or from combating the ideas in certain sub- jects. She is not ordered to refrain from being a partisan. She is ordered to refrain from “touch- ing upon,” from discussing, from teaching, certain subjects. They are: Bolshevism and “similar heresies.” At once the teachers of English who teach cur- rent events in the high schools of Washington were filled with an alarmed curiosity to know what those “similar heresies” might be. Some of them stopped teaching current events until their curiosity could be gratified. They did not want to take any chances on suspensions and losses of pay. They distrusted their own ability to discriminate between heretical and orthodox subjects. At any rate, they distrusted their ability to coincide with the opinions of the board on orthodoxy and on heresy -without further instructions. Also, they wished to know if they might discuss a dead heresy. In recounting the Presidential campaign of 1896, for instance, was it permissible to mention the Democratic candidate and his ideas or would it be necessary to relate the his- tory of the campaign without “touching on” Mr Bryan and Free Silver? The superintendent felt that he must clear up this difficulty, too. His feeling did him honor. He proceeded on the line of his duty, as an employee of that kind of Board Education, toward a degree of elearness blindingly illuminating. He sent out in- structions, by word of mouth, to the effect that one of the subjects not to be discussed was “the League A great questioning therefore arose among all theof Nations.” 114 ‘In time, doubtless, the list of “other heresiés” will be expanded. In view of the proximity of the Wash- ington Board of Education to the White House, the process will not be difficult or slow. There is the “Self-Determination of Peoples,” for instance, an idea which makes much trouble for the House of Have, and there is “Collective Bargaining,” an idea continually appearing in the public prints and very popular with the House of Have Not. The President of the Board of Education of Washington, D C, is George E Hamilton, President of the Capital Trac- tion Company. However, it may well be that the board will rest on its oars. It well might. It has done a good deal. It has abolished Lenin’s system of things and it has abolished Wilson’s system of things ‘out of the education of its city. It has stricken from its curriculum of current events the two largest events current. Lately this country has been considerably stirred by revelations of astounding and appalling illiteracy in the American draft army. But is there anything to be gained by curing American illiteracy if Amer- ican children as soon as they can read are given ever to the care of such people as the members of the Board of Education of Washington, D C? Lit- eracy is only a means to an end. The end is knowl- edge of life as lived and therefore ability to meet it in the power of knowledge. The Board of Educa- tion of Washington, D C, would destroy that end. — Editorial in The New Republic of April 12, 1919. From Local No. 29 (Canal Zone Chapter) UR members have very greatly en- () ' joyed THE AMERICAN TEACHER as well as the communications that have reached us from the various officers connected with the American Federation of Teachers. We have no excuse to offer for not keeping you in closer touch with the situation on the Canal Zone except the tropical manana. Last year practically every teacher joined the Federal Employees Union before we learned that there was an American Federa- tion of Teachers. We very soon applied for a charter, but the school year was nearly ended before we were able to effect anything but a temporary organization. Early in this present school year unexpected obstacles pre- vented some of the regular monthly meetings of the Zone teachers from Cristobal to. Bal- The American Teacher Vol. VIII, No. 5 boa from effecting our final and permanent organization. ‘ We had already affiliated with the Metal Trades Council which was the central labor organization here at that time, so we were more directly connected with the American Federation of Labor than we otherwise would have been. About a month ago a chapter of the A F or L was organized, but we have not as yet made application for affiliation. As you might expect, the Canal with its military organization has more or less of an autocratically organized school system, but a very up-to-date and efficient one in spite of that fact. There are signs, however, that we may get some relief in the direction of a more democratically administered system. One of the difficulties here is the rapid turn-over of the teaching force. Altho we are paid in most cases 25% above simliar teaching positions in Washington the salaries were not high enough to hold many of last year’s best teachers. Our salary committee got busy, and altho the increases in Washing- ton last year did not apply to all teachers, considerable increases were secured for. all the teaching force here with the exception of the supervisors and the superintendent. An interesting feature of our teachers’ union is the fact that we have six regular delegates to the Metal Trades Council, two women and four men, and these delegates on the third Sunday of each month have at- tended some of the most interesting meetings that it has ever been their privilege to attend. Our most important committee is the Ex- ecutive Committee. This committee recently took up the case of a grade principal who had been suddenly asked by the superintendent for his resignation without any adequate charges, so far as we were able to ascertain. We took up the matter directly with the superintendent and received no satisfaction. We then laid the matter before the Metal Trades Council. President McGraner ap- pointed a committee of five to interview the Governor. The principal has been informed that he may withdraw his resignation. Since it is not possible on the Canal Zone to May, 1919 have a Board of Education in the ordinary sense of the term, many people are interested in the formation of a school advisory council, such council to be appointed subject to the ap- proval of the Governor for the purpose of enabling the superintendent and the com- munity to keep in closer touch and to attain greater mutual understanding than at pres- ent. The Teachers Union will welcome any step which will mean a move toward the de- mocratization of the schools. We find it very difficult indeed to instill proper democratic ideals into the growing minds of children without experiencing any taste of the same in our own daily affairs as teachers. In conclusion, we would advise any teach- ers’ union to affiliate with the nearest central labor organization representing the A F of L, if the members wish to learn the true spirit and stimulus of unionization in the shortest possible time. G A MANNING, President. BALBOA, CANAL ZONE. April 1, 1919. From Local No. 48 (Lynchburg Teachers Association) T the meeting of the Lynchburg A Teachers Association, Local No 48, recently held for permanent organi- zation, the following officers were elected: President, Harold T Gates. Vice President, Miss Jessie Peters. Secretary, Miss Helen Nelson. Treasurer, Miss Elizabeth R Curtis. Miss Curtis has since been forced to resign and leave school temporarily for her health and Miss Mary Paul Wallace has been ap- pointed to fill the vacancy. While the charter membership was thirty-eight, the unofficial list as now re- ported is sixty-three. With best wishes for the success of the movement. and its official organ, I am Sincerely, ' HAROLD T GATES. How can we teach the children to keep step with the army of the world’s workers if we have not marched with it ourselves.—Bulletin of the St Paul Grade Teachers’ Federation, January, 1919. The American Teacher 115 From Local No. 66 (Federation of Teachers of Greater Boston) T the first meeting held to organize the A Federation of Teachers of Greater Boston, on April 12, 1919, it was voted to send a letter to the teachers of Greater Boston, urging them to join the Federation, and stating its principal objects as follows: 1 The establishment and maintenance of high standards of education. 2 The securing of adequate salaries and just conditions of employment for teachers. 3 Improving the security of tenure of office. 4 The union of workers by hand and by brain for their mutual advantage. 5 Democratic control of education in ac- cordance with the motto of the American Federation of: “Democracy in Education, Education for Democracy.” FOR CIRCULATION AMONG ALL BOSTON TEACHERS By The Greater Boston Federation of Teachers The next meeting of The Federation of Teachers will be held at Huntington Hall, 491 Boylston Street, Boston, on Friday, May 9, at8 P M. President Still- man, of The American Federation of Teachers, and other speakers, will be present at this meeting. A draft of a very democratic constitution will be pres- ented for consideration and adoption, and temporary officers will be elected to serve until the date of the regular annual meeting, which date will be presum- ably in the fall. All teachers interested in a union are cordially invited to this meeting. Mr Henry Abrahams will be present. The Superintendent of Schools, Mr Frank V Thompson, heartily endorses the union, and said to me personally that he hoped the finest of Boston’s representative teachers would be included among its leaders. Cora BIGELOW, (President, Boston Teachers Club), 36 Hancock St., Boston, Mass. May 2, 1919. STATEMENT OF THE SCHOOL COM- MITTEE OF BOSTON MADE TO A COMMITTEE CONSISTING OF MR NASMYTH AND MR FOLEY, REPRESENTING THE FEDERA- TION OF TEACHERS OF GREATER BOSTON Judge M H Sullivan (Chairman) “When I was first elected to the School Committee 116 I received a delegation of about seventy-five teach- ers, consisting of from one to three representatives from many teachers organizations, each presenting grievances. I resolved then that if all these griev- ances were not removed at the end of three years my work on the committee would not be successful. “Teachers have always been too apologetic. Who has not heard many teachers say, ‘I am only a poor schoolma’m? President Wilson was almost defeated on the cry that he was a schoolmaster.’ Teachers should organize to get a sense of self-respect and power. I am sure if I talked an hour I could not say any more in favor of the movement.” Mr Abrahams (Labor Member) “The teachers ought to have organized in affilia- tion with the American Federation of Labor years ago. Richard J Lane “The Federation of Teachers is in line with the progressive movements of the day. As a sympath- etic and cooperative organization I know it will be of value to the School Committee. “While returning from Washington I had been reading very carefully of the work of the Teachers Federation in Illinois and Washington, and as a result, I agree with other members of the committee that in the proper hands it will be a helpful organ- ization.” Mr Corcoran “If you had not started this movement for the organization of a Teachers Federation, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, someone else would have done it, for the time has come. No one can stop this movement, and as far as I know, no one wants to stop it. I am heartily in favor of it.” Miss Curtis “Eight years ago I felt that the teachers should remain out of the labor movement until the college professors were willing to join, but conditions have greatly changed since then. I am now favorably disposed to the movement. It would be no use for the School Committee merely to express sympathy with the movement; I believe we should endorse it. This would be the best way to establish relations of friendship between the School Committee and the new Federation of Teachers from the beginning.” BOSTON TEACHERS IN UNION Boston, May 5.—The long-discussed organization of the teachers of Boston public schools into a union with American Federation of Labor affiliation is now assured. Before the week is out the union will be fact. It will be known as the Boston Teachers Union. Ata meeting next Friday night a constitution ~ will be presented for adoption and temporary officers elected. The whole plan has the indorsement of Superintendent Thompson, of the city schools, and The American Teacher Vol. VIII, No. 5 the individual approval of all five members of the school board. Concerning the plan for a union, Chairman Sullivan, of the School Committee, says: “When I was first elected to the School Committee I received a delegation of about seventy-five teaches, consisting of from one to three representatives from many teachers’ organizations, each presenting gricv- ances. I resolved then that if all these grievances were not removed at the end of three years my work on the committee would not be successful. Teachers have always been too apologetic. Who has not heard many teachers say, ‘I am only a poor schoolma’am?’ President Wilson was almost defeated on the cry that he was only a schoolmaster. Teachers should organize to get a sense of self-respect and power. I am sure if I talked an hour I could not say any more in favor of the movement.”—From the New York Times of May 6, 1919. POOR OLD NEW YORK Boston is stealing ahead of New York again. The public school teachers are organizing a union, with the endorsement of the Superintendent of Schools and the individual approval of each member of the School Board. This is taking a mean advantage at a time when the New York Superintendent and Board of Education are waging a campaign against the local teachers’ union. But Boston has always respected the teacher, and retains a good part of the New England tradition about freedom in educa- tion. “Teachers,” says a member of the School Committee, “have always been too apologetic... .. President Wilson was almost defeated on the cry that he was only a schoolmaster. Teachers should organize to get a sense of self-respect and power.” Are Boston teachers, then, so much meeker than those in New York? Apparently not, for the same official also said: ““‘When I was first elected to the School Committee I received a delegation of about seventy-five teachers, containing from one to three representatives from many teachers’ organizations, each presenting grievances. I resolved then that if all these grievances were not removed at the end of three years, my work on the committee would be unsuccessful.” It looks as if the difference lies in the official attitude —Editorial in The Evening Post (New York) of May 6 1919. MASSACHUSETTS TEACHERS, TAKE NOTICE! Copies of this number are being sent on the re- quest of Miss Mabel M Anderson, Chairman of the Publicity Committee of the Massachusetts Teachers’ Federation, to the chairmen of the publicity com- mittees of the seventy-five teachers’ clubs in Mas- sachusetts and to certain other teachers in the state. Miss Anderson urges that these copies be circulated widely for the information they contain.—Editor, The American Teacher. May, 1919 NIGHT LETTER 1919 MAY 10 AM 2 10 BOSTON, MASS EDITOR, THE AMERICAN TEACHER, 70 FIFTH AVE, NEW YORK, N Y CROWDED MEETING ABOUT EIGHT HUNDRED TEACHERS HUNTINGTON HALL TONIGHT DEMONSTRATED WIDESPREAD INTEREST AROUSED BY FORMATION GREATER BOSTON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS FINE ADDRESS PRESIDENT STILLMAN FOL- LOWED BY DISCUSSION PROPOSED CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS BUT DEFINITE ADOPTION AND ELECTION OF OFFICERS POSTPONED UNTIL NEXT MEETING OF MEMBERS PROB- ABLY WEDNESDAY EVENING MAY TWENTY FIRST PILGRIM HALL BOS- TON GEORGE NASMYTH. From Local No.—?P ~ (NOT YET A LOCAL) Seattle, Washington ADELLA M PARKER HE Washington State legislature, at T the session just closed, passed two laws which the teachers worked for. One was the “equal pay” law prohibiting any school board from discriminating in pay on account of sex. The other was an act strengthening the retirement fund law in cities of the first class by providing that the district shall double the fund paid in by the teachers if that be necessary to meet the obligations. The vote on the equal pay law was 84 to 3 in the House and 34 to 1 in the Senate. No measure so well advertised has been be- for the legislature this year, so the politicians said. Margaret M Gorman, of the Franklin High School, who had charge of the bill, had the state so well organized and the legisla- tors so well lined up, that neither she nor any other teachers left their schoolrooms a The American Teacher 117 single day to attend the sessions of the legis- lature. Representative E H Guie, of Seat- tle, steered the measure, and every Kings county member was loyal to the teachers. This measure did not equalize the high school salaries in Seattle, as is does not go into effect until June. That action was taken independently as a result of the school elec- tion. However, the Seattle equal pay cam- paign was responsible for the launching of this statewide measure. Mrs Francis M Haskell, of Tacoma, the only woman member of the legislature, made the retirement fund amendment her special charge. In fact, she sacrificed another measure to get this on the calendar when the “rules committee” told her that she must choose between them. When the bill came to a vote the Senate indulged in a practical joke at her expense. To her great consterna- tion a motion to table the bill carried unani- mously. But when it was immediately taken from the table and passed 31 to 3 she forgave the members the moment of disappoinment. The vote in the House had been 84 to 11. An amendment to the school code increas- ing the term of school directors from 3 to 5 years and electing only one each year was killed. This is the Official Organ of the American Federation of Teachers ORGANIZED APRIL 15, 1916 Affiliated with the American Federation of Labor OFFICERS OF THE A F OF T President, CHARLES B STILLMAN, Chicago, 1620 Lake Avenue, Wilmette, III. Secretary-Treasurer, F G StTecker, Chicago, 1618 Lake Avenue, Wilmette, IIl. National Organizer; First Vice-President, L V LAMpPson, Washington, D. C., 1386 Otis Place, N. W. 118 The American Teacher THOUSANDS OF TEACHERS JOIN OR- GANIZED LABOR Washington, Monday, April 28, 1919—A new charter every other day under the American Federa- tion of Teachers is the rate at which the organ- ization wave among public school teachers of the United States has been spreading during the past month, according to reports received at the Washing- ton office of the National Women’s Trade Union League. The American Federation of Teachers is affiliated both with the American Federation of Labor and the National Women’s Trade Union League, and has to date chartered_a total of 70 local unions from coast to coast. This it is stated, represents a 100-per-cent organization in many local- ities. The aims of this vigorous young national trade union organization of educators are democratization of the schools and fair working conditions for teach- ers. Various school boards, it is pointed out, have lately exhibited their autocratic, illiberal attitude on public questions to the extent of actual persecu- tion of teachers and the attempted suppression of free discussion in the schools. Accompanying this form of oppression, as a public scandal of years’ standing, is the salary scale of teachers, which for the entire United States averages $600 per year, and there are thousands of teachers receiving only $300 and $400 per year. “We insist,” says the national president of the American Federation of Teachers, Charles B Still- man, of Chicago, “that boards of education have no proprietary right in the schools. They should be roud to consider themselves, with the teachers, fel- ow servants of the public. Therefore, we demand a voice in the government of the schools: (1) thru representation on the school boards; thru teachers’ councils in every school, consisting of chosen rep- resentatives of the teachers who shall be consulted by the authorities on all questions affecting teachers or pupils; and, (3) the election of school boards by popular vote. And we demand, in behalf of the children of this land free discussion of public ques- tions in the class room. It is impossible to make good citizens without discussing the problems of cit- = “Backed as we are by organized labor everywhere, we propose to fight, in every instance, the arbitrary, autocratic procedure of school boards illustrated in the case of Miss Alice Wood in Washington and of Dr Benjamin Glassberg in New York. “For relief as to the salary schedule of teachers, we have already demonstrated that organization un- der the American Federation of Labor is the best way to work. In New York, for example, with the assistance of the New York State Federation of Labor, we have secured the passage of a bill in the legislature allowing considerable increases in the pay of teachers. The teachers unions in Washington, now two years old, have in that riod secured congressional action raising their minimum salary from $500 to $750, and after July 1, they will share in the $240 increase obtained for all government employees by the National Federation of Federal Employees with the teachers cooperating. Our local in Madison, Wisconsin, which was organized but five months ago, by taking active part in the local prim- aries and election, secured a non-partisan board of education and so impressed itself upon the com- munity that the retiring board granted a $150 salary increase to the teachers before its term of office expired. Chicago, Vallejo, Cal, and other cities fur- Vol. VIII, No. 5 nish similar examples of the teachers’ achievements by means of their affiliation with the organized oape movement thru the American Federation of sabor.” National Organizer, L V Lampson, formerly of the Central High School of Washington, D C, reports new teachers’ locals established in Galveston, San Antonio, Austin, and Denison, Texas, within the past week. Recently teachers in Boston, including Har- vard professors, have organized into the Greate: Boston Federation of Teachers, and there is also a local in the faculty of the University of Illinois. Other cities or counties in which charters have been issued are: New York City, Buffalo, and Olean N Y; Philadelphia, Shenandoah, Mahonoy City. and Shamokin, Pa; — Prince George, and Mont gomery Counties, Md; ashington, D C; Norfolk Portsmouth, and Lynchburg, Va; New Orleans, La; Lauderdale County, Miss; Memphis, Tenn; Gary, Valpariso, Linton and Jasonville, Ind; Lancaster. and Athens County, Ohio; Chicago, Peoria, Granit« City, Johnston City, Westville, Royalton, and Mur physboro, Ill; Madison, Wis; St Paul and Minnea polis, Minn; Garvin County, Ardmore County, an: Coalgate, Okla; San Francisco, Sacramento, Vallejo, and Visalia Cal; and the Canal Zone. The national officers are: President, Charles } Stillman, of Chicago, Ill; Vice-Presidents, Mabel |. Roes, of Brooklyn, N Y; Anita Bailey, Gary, Ind; L V Lampson, Washington, D C; Judith G Riddick, Norfolk, Va; S E Compton, Washington, D C; Henr) R Linville, of New York City; Clara K Stuz, Wash ington, D C; Carrie L Colburn Olean, N Y; and Isabel Williams, St Paul, Minn; Secretary-Treasurer, F G Stecker, of Chicago, Ill; National Organizer. L V Lampson, of Washington, D C; and Editor of the official organ, THE AMERICAN TEACHER,. Henry R Linville, of New York, N Y.—Press Service 0/ the National Women’s Trade Union League. TRADE UNION COLLEGE The Boston central labor union has started a college where workers may secure an education o1 any subject they desire. Some of the most notable and liberal-minded educators in the east have become interested in the project and the Boston Globe says: “Academic freedom will not worry instructors; they will have nothing to fear from not pleasing the donors of the college—because it has no en- dowment.” The policy of this college will not be shaped “from above,” in secret meetings of the faculty—it will b« shaped by a committee on which members of th: unions sit with the instructors. The final decisio: in any matter may be referred to the central labo: union as a whole.—From A F of L Weekly News letter of April 12 1919. UNION COLLEGE OPENS The college started by the central labor unio) opened its doors with more than 150 enrolled stu dents. The purpose of the college is to provid higher education for the workers.. The students in clude both sexes and all ages. In one instance father and daughter sat together. Among the first lessons are: “How to Write Eng- lish,” “Shop Committees and Collective Bargaining,” “Master Pieces of Literature,” and “The Distribu tion of Wealth.”.—From The A F of L Newslette: of April 19, 1919. —— a a a ee a May, 1919 Illinois University Teachers Union Special to The Christian Science Monitor from its Western News Office. URBANA, Illinois—The University of Illinois is he first large university of the country at which action has been taken in the way of organizing a eachers’ union. This was formed here recently inder the name of the Associated Teachers of the University of Illinois. The Associated Teachers is . branch of the American Federation of Teachers, nd this latter organization is affiliated with the \merican Federation of Labor. A smaller eastern nstitution. is regarded here as being first in the ield of the higher education to take similar action. A C Cole, assistant professor of history at the University of Illinois, was placed at the head of the newly formed Associated Teachers as temporary president. Speaking of its reason for being, he said to a representative of The Christian Science Moni- tore “The purpose of the Associated Teachers of the University of Illinois is to further the cause of demoeracy in education. Conditions in the Univer- sity of Illinois reflect the general situation in the academic world. Unlike the followers of most pro- fessions, instructors generally are without a demo- cratic voice in determining the conditions under which they perform their services to the public. This has caused a widespread academic unrest. The associated teachers hope to influence the adoption of a democratic arrangement for the determination of their tenure of office and of their working con- ditions. They would look with favor upon an ar- rangement by which the administration of higher learning would be truly democratized. For this reason they might raise such issues as that of the proposed constitution of the. University of Illinois, which was drafted a half-dozen years ago and which has since been sidetracked or pigeonholed. “There is also dissatisfaction with the financial returns that come to the university teacher. He sees vast sums of money put into brick and plaster and yet finds himself impotent to maintain the standards which the profession requires. Salaries of teachers often do not permit them to give full attention to their academic duties; they sometimes have to stay at home to do work which they can- not afford to hire done. Some one has said that the university instructor is rapidly losing his finan- cial self-respect. Furthermore, there is little in- centive to attract able men to the profession. “Conditions at the University of Illinois are no more intolerable than at other universities; it is natural, however, that a state which leads in labor organization should produce the first teachers’ union to be organized at a state university.”—From Chris- tian Science Monitor, of March 28, 1919. CoLuMBus, OHIO, MARCH 1.—The increasing num- ber of Ohio school teachers who are resigning be- cause of low wages is alarming some state law mak- ers who now propose to make it impossible for the teachers to resign without giving two months’ notice. If a teacher quits without giving two months’ notice boards of education are enjoined to report such “un- authorized” resignations to the board of examiners, who in turn must send out a monthly blacklist to county superintendents—From A. F. of L, Weekly News Letter. The American Teacher An Open Letter To the U S Commissioner of Education: Sir: I have come in contact through various sources with your wail concerning a shortage of teachers the eountry over. The situation, you say, was brought about by the entrance of teachers from colleges, universities and small public schools into all kinds of war work. I suppose you would ascribe the reasons for the shift to economic and patriotic considerations. So far as your survey goes that is probably correct. But there is still a considerable group of teachers of the highest ability now out of the profession for a very different reason—and their number is daily increasing. I refer to the group who have left or are leaving the profession because of the bigoted, partisan persecution they are receiving at the hands of self-appointed keepers of the public conscience—if indeed they are not actually evicted by these impostors. he school history of New York City has offered conspicuous examples of this deplorable condition in the last two years, and instances of like character are re- vealed thruout the union. The writer was himself a teacher before the war, and was then conscripted to fight in arms for the principles of human freedom. Now as we return from the battlefield where we thought oppression and injustice had been done to death, we find every- where we turn that freedom and justice have fled from our own beloved country, and everywhere little tsars and kaisers are imposing their arbitrary and unenlightened will upon the people. You say you have plans and schemes for draw- ing teachers into the profession. That is good; but let me say to you, sir, that if these schemes and plans do not include the abolition of the in- quisition by your underlings your planning and scheming will be largely in vain. No doubt that for a price you will always be able to hire a cer- tain number of men and women who will pass on to the children of the nation certain readymade mouthings—if you are willing to let that pass as the intellectual and moral foundation of future America. But do you think that men and women of self-respect and intelligence will prostitute their souls and bring disaster upon their country for thirty pieces of silver? I assure you they will not —and with defiant emphasis! If the men we have delegated to administer our public policies insist on betraying their trust recent history has taught us the one effective process of relieving them from further responsibility. Butte, Montana. W. H. OLDENBURG. —From The New Republic, of March 15 1919 JUSTICE BEGINNING TO WORK IN THE WEST Dr. Louis Levine, professor of economics at Mon- tana State University at Missoula, has been re- instated by the State Board of Education, in session at Helena, after having been suspended from the faculty of the university for two months. Dr Levine’s suspension followed the publication of a monograph on the taxation of mines in Montana said to have been inimical to the corporate mining interests of the State, especially the Anaconda Cop- per Mining Company. His suspension was ordered by E. C. Elliott, chancellor of the university —From The Public of April 26, 1919. The American Teacher Vol. VIII, No. 5 Hilt Superintendent Chadsey of Chicago Believes In— “An elected school board; “A small school board; “Merger of business and educational departments of the schools under one superintendent; Pee “Definition of the powers, authority and limitations of the superintendent and of the board of education; “Publicity of school finance; “Right of teachers to organize; “Consultation with teachers in framing courses of study; “Right of teachers to agitate for higher salaries; “Adequate salaries for teachers; “Sufficient pensions for retired teachers; “Right of teachers to hearing before dismissal ; “Opportunity for inefficient teachers to improve work before dismissal; “Access for teachers to their efficiency marks.” Briefly, Chadsey believes in the square deal for teachers and in democracy in the public schools. Looks as tho-Chicago is lucky in getting Dr. Chadsey, even at $18,000 a year. INN AH NR HN il