American i Geacher Democracy im Education: E ducation for Democracy. “NEW YORK, JUNE, 1913 50 CENTS A YEAR — — eT nes ane cae arr eer ae ae = LE SERS at etme RE wage ee re ro sos " ate ee — FACTS VERSUS OPINION IN EFFICIENT SCHOOL WORK FRANK P. BACHMAN, Ph.D., Assistant Superintendent Scientific Management in School Work THE TERM “scientific management” has come into prominence within the last few years. “Scientific management” as employed in current literature has to do with business. In the field of affairs where efficiency and economy were sup- posed to exist, need has been found of radical reformation in methods. Serious study of what is involved in a given product, of how to inspire workmen to do their best, and of how to select men for given tasks, is bringing about a revo- lution in the business world. Workmen in quite every line of ac- tivity are subjected to definite measures of efficiency. This is true whether in handling pig iron, or in the production of articles involving skill, intelligence and taste. But school people, as a rule, have resented the thought that their efficiency can be measured by any of the criteria or checks of business, or by any definite standards. The teacher attempts to measure the efficiency of the child, but she demurs at the idea that her efficiency may at least be relatively determined by the regularity of the attendance of her pupils, by the amount of absence, or by the number of withdrawals, failures in studies or non-promotions. In a word, both superintendents and teachers have to a large degree held themselves aloof from any definite tests, and from-any measures of efficiency. The day is however near at hand when school administrators and teachers must come to appreciate that they are not a chosen class of workers, but that their work, like the work of all others, must be judged in view of relative standards. We must come to accept the fact that the school is a machine organized and supported by society to do a specific type of work, and that as a machine or tool it is subject to definite tests of ef- ficiency. We must come to appreciate that the spirit of scientific management of Schools, Cleveland as now applied to business must be car- ried over into the field of education to do for the school what it is now doing for business. Present Place of Opinion in Sc V’ork Not only have superintendents teachers been more or less free f the exacting tests of other activities, | administrators have been guided in t work by opinion rather than by facts no other field does personal opinion sO prominent a part. The busines the school is carried on in a given to-day because this was the practise terday; the school year is of a g length because this was its length ; cade ago; given methods of prom: are continued because these were methods of the past; classes are organ- ized in a given way because they organized the same way one hun: years ago; our attitude toward for languages, toward science, toward fo mal grammar, toward the time and lace given to arithmetic; our ideas of wv to begin the teaching of formal spe« or of writing or of geography, of much to require in a given grade not upon facts, but upon opinions- ions which in turn are determined to a considerable extent by education and temperament. Not only in the work of admin tion are our policies a reflection greater or less extent of personal biz but even in similar matters—if they may be so called—the personal point of view dominates. We all arbitrarily a--ume that the elementary school and the high school are doing all they shoul: for their pupils; that pupils are efficicnt i reading ; that this style and type of wrt ing is preferable; that our children are good or poor in spelling; that the work in history and geography is effective; that the proper emphasis is placed upon ’ + CM, pin- stra- 82 THE AMERICAN TEACHER, each of the studies, and that these are given their proper time value and their proper emphasis in the advancement of children thru the school. Seldom if ever, in the past have school men proved by systematic investigation any of the above assumptions. lf the public school is to be scientifi- cally managed; if school administration is to be elevated above the plane of per- sonal opinion; if the work of the super- intendent as well as of the teacher is to be measured by definite criteria; if our theories are to be given foundation; if our assumptions with reference to lines of work, methods of instruction, mastery of subject matter and skill in manipula- tion are to be displaced by positive knowledge, scientific and systematic study must be made of school methods and of school results. For only as facts take the place of opinion, assumption gives way to definite knowledge, mere personal opinion yields to established principles will the administration of our schools and the instruction in them be placed upon a firm footing and become efficient. Facts Versus Opinion in Determining Methods of Instruction An illustration or two will make clear the mode of procedure, as we take it, which must be pursued at least in spirit if the management of our schools is to become scientific. The objective purpose of teaching reading in the primary grades is to en- able the child to master the mechanics of reading. There are a number of well known methods: The natural method, the sentence method, the word method, and the Ward method. What is the or- dinary way of determining which of these methods is preferable? The fol- lowing method of selection is more or less representative. _ A given primary teacher may be us- ing, tor example, the “natural method.” She attends a summer session in some repuiahle college and takes a course in the ‘sentence method.” At the begin- ning of the new year she discards the method previously used, the “natural method,” and teaches primary reading according to the sentence method. The following summer she again attends summer school, this time taking a course in the “Ward method.” In turn the “sentence method” is discarded and the Ward method introduced. No attempt whatever is made to test the efficiency of the methods adopted. Indeed, the average teacher feels under no constraint to measure results. If the given method of instruction appeals to her fancy, if the children seem to be happy and there is no objection from above, the teacher as a rule is content. Methods of teach- ing in general are thus adopted and re- jected much like spring fashions. So long, however, as the acceptance and rejection of methods of instruction rest upon mere personal preference, so long as no test is made of the results derived therefrom, so long will school teaching be school keeping, and the work of the school more or less haphazard. Only as methods of teaching are subjected to severe quantitative measurements, will! teachers be in a position to determine the worth of given methods of instruc- tion, and the school thereby rendered efficient. Facts Versus Opinion in Standardizing Subjects, Departments and Schools The value of studies is fixed by the time allotted in the daily program. Study requirements and practise seem- ingly have little relation to the value ascribed. Reading, for example, was given in the time schedule of the Cleve- land Public Schools in 1909 and Ig10, 25 per cent. of the total time of the ele- mentary schools, language and gram- mar 15 per cent., arithmetic 16 per cent. and history 4 per cent. In the first year of the Cleveland High Schools an equal allotment of time is provided for in Latin, English, algebra and natural his- tory. Nevertheless, the failures in lan- guage and grammar at the end of the year 1910 were, in view of. the time value ascribed, almost four times as many as in reading, those in arithmetic three times larger than in reading, while those in history were six times larger. 84 THE AMERICAN TEACHER In the high schools 26 per cent. of the children drop out or fail in Latin, 15 per cent. in English, 13 per cent. in al- gebra and 22 per cent. in natural his- tory. In one elementary school the fail- ures in arithmetic amounted to 25 per cent. In another doing the same work there were no failures. In the high schools those dropping out and failing in first year Latin, ranged in the several schools from 26 per cent to 41 per cent., in algebra from 26 per cent. to 46 per cent., in geometry (second year study) from 23 per cent. to 45 per cent. Such variations in failures in studies reveal a need for _ standardization. Standards for completing a sttidy of great value should be such as actually to put the emphasis on that study, rather than, as is now the case that the pres- sure on a study of small worth when measured by the time allotted, should be from two to twenty times greater than the pressure upon a study of great im- portance. Yet until positive data are collected with reference to failures by studies in the various grades, and these data made the basis of administrative action, little can be accomplished in equalizing and standardizing study re- quirements. There is a similar need with regard to standardizing individual schools. That schools should be rightly judged with re- gard to their work and that there should be reasonable uniformity in the require. ments of different schools working un- der similar conditions, there can be li'tle doubt. Yet, before this can be done data must be collected with reference to fuil- ures by studies, non-promotions in { second year subjects prescribed; in the third year, third; and in the fourth year ties with Cleveland for second place The material at the disposal of the School Inquiry Committee did not en- able it to determine the manner in which the published courses in the ten other cities were administered in practise. In New York City, however, numerous an] in some instances very great divergences from the published courses were (is- covered. The divergences are all with- in the restricted fields laid out; in some cases they mean minimized work, but not work differentiated to meet special needs of pupils. In Prof. Davis’ study of the offerings of special and technical courses in the eleven cities he finds that New York: is far from being abreast of the times. Considering the size of the city, the vari- ous nationalities represented, and the differ- ent intellectual, artistic and vocational ap- titudes among the students, the provisions for special courses or special schools of other types in New York City fall far short of what is being undertaken in several other places In nearly every one of the ten cities many special courses are available to the boys and girls in the general high schools. This arrangement makes it /o:- sible for the pupils to test their interest (Continued on page 91) THE AMERICAN TEACHER 89 The American Ceacher Education for Denecray ‘ublished monthly, except July and August, by THE AMERICAN TEACHER 225 Fifth Ave., New York. ABRIEL R. MASON,- - - - P) esident, [ARK HOFFMAN, - - - - Treasure. E. MAYMAN, - - - Business Manager. De ocracy in Education ; ENRY R. LINVILLE, - - Editor-in-Chief. ENJAMIN C, GRUENBERG, - Senanag Sean. lress all manuscripts and other communica- tions to THE AMERICAN TEACHER, 225 Fifth Avenue, New York. Send notice of change of address promptly giving the old as well as the new address. rhe Magazines will be | sent to subscribers until g an order to discontinue, together with all arrearages, is received. At the time of expivation. a pink renewal notice will be found in the copy. Remittances should be made in - postal money order, express order, draft, stamps or check (New Yor exchange). Subscription price, 50 cents for the year. (Foreign, 60 cents) ( opyright, 1913, by THE AMERICAN TEACHER. “ao Entered at the Post Office of New York as second-class matter. No. 6 Vo. T his paper seeks to olvaien ae status of the teacher to the dignity and the in- fluence of a profession, by advocating high standards of admission to the call- ing; by urging an extension of the op- portunities for the participation of teach- ers in the direction of educational affairs ; and by supporting the organization of teachers for all legitimate professional purposes. UNASHAMED WE HAVE BEEN TOLD that school teachers, when among strangers, make fre: wuently desperate efforts to conceal the fact that they are school teachers. There are undoubtedly reasons for be- ing ashamed of some of our colleagues; yet that would be equally true if we were lawyers or merchants or senators. But being ashamed of some of our colleagues is no reason for being ashamed of our calling. We have among us very many who do not earn what they receive; but we have also a large number who earn more than they can ever expect to re- ceive. We have not, on the whole, the social recognition that some of us think we should have; but perhaps we shall get more as fast as we succeed in bringing up a generation of young men and women with a new standard of values. It will hardly do to rail at the public’s lack of appreciation; the public has been influenced by its teachers, and we must be prepared to accept the consequences. We do not need to match our garments and jewels against those worn by mem- bers of the leisure class, nor need we be ashamed that our equipages are not in the style of those displayed by the ex- ploiting classes. We do not, on the whole, occupy so large a space on the front page of the newspaper as we think we should; but that is not a serious grievance, nor is it anything to be ashamed of—and perhaps the remedy is in our own hands after all. If we do our work as well as we can day by day, if we look forward to im- proving the condition of the work for ourselves and for our less energetic col- leagues, we do worthily. If we do these things conscientiously, we know too well how far short we come of doing what should be done. But we know also that none serve more faithfully; and in all due modesty we may look the salesman and the banker in the face— UNASHAMED. When you go on your vacation this summer, do not try to hide your place in society, or in the history of modern man. You have made many blunders, as have all of us, but you are resolved to avoid similar blunders in the future. You have submitted to many indignities, as have all of us, but you are resolved to raise your work to a human plane next year. Think faith in your calling as the one best worth following; think faith in yourself as one worthy of the calling—-or get out of it. On board the ocean steamer, you can not hide your calling—unless you are 90 THE AMERICAN TEACHER I. Teachers’ Interests Committees exceptionally clever, in which case you 1, Committee on Professional Impr. should not want to. You cannot hide your calling--we are marked for life. Make up your mind that the mark shall be not a Blot, but a Star. * * * THe AMERICAN TEACHER has been working from its inception in the pride of our profession. This is not a com- mercial enterprise—-on the contrary. We have asked our friends to subscribe; and we have urged our readers to renew their subscriptions. We believe that we have demonstrated the need for an or- gan devoted to the ideals and the prin- ciples for which this magazine strives. We find encouragement in the growing volume of opinion in harmony with the views which we have put forth. We ob- serve with great satisfaction the emer- gence of teachers in all parts of the country into the consciousness of the need for an improved status. We feel that we are contributing to this educa- tional and professional rebirth, while we realize that we are but part of a larger movement that is carrying us all along with it. Under these circumstances we no longer hesitate to call upon our read- ers to do what they can to assist in carrying forward the work we have un- dertaken. Get readers, even if they can’t afford to subscribe. Tall. Tre AMERICAN TEACHER every chance you find; get subscribers and send us the money. GOOD PLANS HERE IS a suggestion of constructive work undertaken by The Teachers’ League of New York. It is a good be- ginning. Now let the investigations be actually carried out. If that is done suc- cessfully, we shall not need to worry much about the professional spirit and understanding of this particular teachers’ organization. THE TEACHERS’ LEAGUE COMMITTEE BULLETIN The following is a brief outline of the work which the Teachers’ League of New York will undertake in the present school year and in the year 1913-14: II. . Committee ment a Free Courses b Opportunities for Visiting Sabbatical Years Constructive Supervision Pedagogical Experimentation . Committee on Ratings, Promotions Salaries on Pensions, Retirem and Compensation for Disability Committee on the Status of Mar: Women Teachers Pupils’ Interests Committees . Committee on the Course of Study a Elementary Schools b High Schools (Considered with reference to social efficiency of the school) . Committee on Textbooks and Supplies (Considered with reference to t eir usefulness for the purpose which intended, and with refer¢ to economy) . Committee on School Hygiene Organization and Efficiency Commit tees . Committee on School Organization Management a Teachers Initiative b Size of Schools c Size of Classes d Clerical Work e Programs f Provision for Exceptional Childrc: . Committee on Reports and Statistic (With the duty of inquiring accurate methods of systematizi: facts) Committee on Legislation (With the duty of keeping in touc! with legislation affecting education in this and other states, and with the duty of.making suggestions for laws needed to carry out the pur- poses of the League) . General Committees = 3. Committee on Publications Committee) L Committee on Finance 4. Teachers are . Committee on Membership | - (With the duty of informing sm: or large bodies of teachers throug! out the city about the purposes the work of the League) Committee on the Press (Libr invited to become of any one of these committees — N ing making yourself o, Gracie, Democracy does not mean disrespectful to the authorities. It m worthy of respect. mem)ers THE THE COURSE OF STUDY IN HIGH SCHOOLS (Continued from page 88) in other subjects than those available to the boys and girls of New York who happen to have cast their lots with the general schools. To the extent to which school system offers courses that mect the tastes and aptitudes of the pupils, they have “equal educational opportun- ities,” but equal opportunities cannot mean the same opportunities. Large numbers of children enter the high schools without knowing what they want to do. Some enter who think they know what they want to do, but some- times a short experience shows them that they were mistaken. Ideas of chil- dren change just as the ideas of adults change with experience. For those who do not know what they want, and for those who change their minds, the in- flexible course of study offers no hope. The school which provides for all has far more opportunity to keep them all. Proof is available that one of the most important causes for pupils leaving the high school in the first year is the re- pellent attitude which the inflexible course makes the school assume toward the children who do not happen to be adapted to the work as presented. The solution of the problem of how to find out what kind of courses would make the school more useful to the chil- dren and to the community, Prof. Davis thinks can best be worked out by the high school principal in conjunction with the teachers of the school. He recom- mends that every five years the school reanalyze the entire local situation anew. He says: Only by adopting some such procedure can urse of study be kept in touch with the ee of the community it is designed to and in harmony with contemporary edu- nal principles. 'he Committee takes the ground that atever may be the intrinsic values of cer- prescribed subjects, those values are not zable to any satisfactory degree unless subjects can be made to relate themselves ) the* past, the present, or the prospective AMERICAN TEACHER 91 pupils individual of the future experiences pursuing them. The analysis offered by the Commit- tee of the factors of universal impor- tance in the lives of people establishes the basis for the choice of subjects that the schools may reasonably require of the pupils. The percentage of the subjects thus demanded is much less than re- quired now in New York City. More- over, many of the old subjects are of- fered as subcourses, to be taken up as taste for them develops, or as their con- nection with the future plans of the pupil can be demonstrated. The paragraph outlining the Commit- tee’s recommendations for a _ recon- structed course in so significant that it is presented here in complete form: In the light of practise elsewhere, and in keeping with current educational opinion, as voiced in associational resolutions, in maga- zine articles, and in public discussions, we feel justified in making the following recommenda- tions, namely: (1) In English, including language study, composition, literature, and oral expression, three years of work, with five recitation per- iods per week. (2) In the social sciences, two years of work, including a year’s work in introductory social science (based on municipal activities, civic, industrial, and commercial, and includ- ing vocational guidance), and a year’s work in American history and civics. The first course may be assigned (three or) four periods per week; the last should be assigned five periods per week. (3) In natural science, a year of work in introductory natural science, covering four (or five) periods per week, based on biology, and including much instruction in bacteri- ology, physiology, and hygiene. (4) In manual training for boys and do- mestic science and art for girls, four double periods per week thruout one year. (5) In physical training and games, two periods per week thruout four years, the work being conducted so as to give relaxation and pleasure, and to develop useful habits of exer- cise; and not so much as is often noticed at present to secure approximation to theoreti- cal ideals of grace and beauty of form. (6) In “Assembly” talks, readings, and addresses, one period per week during the en- tire four years, the material presented to call for pupil reactions in some definite form each week. (7) In music, one period per week for two years; and (8) In drawing, one period per week for two years. THE AMERICAN TEACHER GENERAL § Professor EpwarRpD C. University In the prefatory statement, Prof. El- liott, after pointing out and defining the various kinds of school control—legis- lative, administrative, supervisory and inspectorial—comes to the conclusion that there seems to be nowhere, at least within the school system, a clear and conscious discrimination between those activities of control that are administra- tive in character, and those that are su- pervisory or inspectorial. The absence of this distinction in the minds of those charged with the main responsibility has been, it is believed, an important factor in retarding the progress and complicat- ing the development of the public school system. Under the heading The System of General Supervision the findings are that the schools are controlled too largely on the external administrative side, and too little by constructive and expert supervi- sion; that the major energies of all the supervising staff are consumed by the general administrative and routine cleri- cal duties. There is too little progres- sive leadership. The mechanical side of the educative process is emphasized. There is a striking lack of consciousness within the school system of the radical dif- ference between merely keeping the schools in operation, and keeping the schools in opera- tion so as to produce tangible results of high quality. The organization of the school sys- tem has been from the top down, rather than from the bottom up; a procedure as obstruc- tive to progress and real growth in education as it is in other human institutions. Prof. Elliott divides principals into two general classes: (a) those who are competent to act as supervisors and make a conscious effort to subordinate the rou- tine administrative tasks, and (b) those who are content to confine their activ- ities to the mechanics of school operation and control. Refore the elementary schools of the citv are individually properly supervised, there must be a considerable increase in the number of the first group, and the chief educational authorities must find a way of placing a prem- ITI UPERVISION ELLIOTT of Wisconsin ium on supervisory capacity by providing free- dom of action to every principal in accerd- ance with his competency. That supervi-\ is best which controls and is controlled | On the basis of the ratings given p: cipals during the year 1910-1911, tl was but one inferior principal in elementary schools of the city ninety-one per cent. of the principals pos- sessed meritorious competency. The i vestigator believes that an inflated val has been given to the judgment of prin- cipals and that the wide variation in rat- ings between the different supervisor; districts is due to the wide variability of standard. “The work of principals 1s not subjected to that cautious, ol jective examination that should c stitute the foundation of the atin; if the ratings are worth making at all. Vague general impressions should not be as they undoubtedly are, the chief « ments of these ratings. The rating principals seems to be generally regarde/ as a merely formal procedure. ings of one year are very often merely copied from the ratings of the pre- ceding year. On the whole “the tem of rating the efficiency of principals is not such as to distinguish the com tent from the incompetent.” Of The District Superintende Prof. Elliott says that they are noticea inert. There are no_ well-establis! standards of qualifications for nomina- tion of district superintendents. P: Elliott here suggests that the recently e tablished standard of “superior merit” would be more valid with reference the staff of district superintendents, «s a condition for appointment and ret tion. The district superintendents h: little or no freedom, initiative or respon- sibility. They have but slight influenc upon the determination of educati policies. As at present constituted, office of district superintendent can be an altogether satisfactory position ‘ the energetic, progressive, and cofistriic- The rat- Sy THE AMERICAN TEACHER tive individual, whose primary interests are in education and its adaptation to the needs of children. Under the heading The City Superin- tendent, The Board of Superintendents, and The Associate Superintendents, the Report states that criticisms of the schools have been discouraged and repressed by the authorities. None of the teachers wh» offered information were willing to permit their names to appear as wit- nesses of record. “The explanation for thi: disinclination invariably given was, that the expression of critical judgments militated seriously against their profes- sional standing and advancement.” This circumstance “relects a condition of affairs wholly detri- mental to the progressive development of the bes! interests of the schools. Those primarily responsible for the school organization and its operation appear, intentionally or uninten- tionally, to have discouraged competent criti- cism and to have permitted incompetent cri- ticism to undermine an intelligent public con- fidence.” Praise is given to the city superinten- dent for having during the past decade consolidated the school system into a co- herent whole. Prof. Elliott thinks, how- ever, that the policy of centralization has now gone far enough. Mechanical consolidation, with the resulting standardization of aims and values, has been effected. The next epoch of educational con- trol will need to be dominated by the idea of establishing a scheme of decentralized, co- _ ‘ative, expert supervision. Military stand- ds of authority and organization cannot be ie nanently adapted to the enterprise of edu- cation. Education, particularly public educa- a , is a great undertaking, and therefore, st make provision for the initiative, inde- - lence, and creative activity of every in- dividual charged with responsibility. The administrative efficiency of a great, complex ol system demands a high degree of cen- zation of administrative power. On the r hand, the supervisory efficiency of the ol system is conditioned by a degree of co- ration which has not yet been fully com- ended by the City Superintendent. Ma- linery stifles individuality; co-operative ef- t expands individuality. The teaching of dren and the direction of their education e dependent, ultimately, upon freedom, not epression. The Board of Examiners.—Prof. Elliott, on the whole, commends the work of the Board of Examiners. The ques- tions used in the recent examinations, he regards as fair tests of professional preparation. But he does not think the class-room tests are highly efficient. These tests are generally conducted un- der abnormal teaching conditions, and the standards of judgments applied are wholly unreliable. With regard to the regular oral tests, Prof. Elliott believes that the Board has been too lenient in passing persons of doubtful personal and linguistic qualiii- cations. On the whole, while the Board has made mistakes in individual cases, “it has exercised its functions in a singu- larly effective and progressive manner.” The Report recommends that the size of the Board of Examiners be increased to nine members and that a rotating plan of membership be adopted. A plan by which some of the Board would be en- gaged in active supervision would enable the Board as a whole to keep itself ‘n closer touch with the schools and their needs. Methods and Standards for Determin- ing Teaching Efficiency.—According to the ratings of teachers, there are very tew teachers who are regarded by prin- cipals and superintendents as rendering non-meritorious service. Only one ele- mentary school teacher out of 2217 was rated as wholly deficient in discipline in June, 1911. There is also a wide varia- tion between the ratings of principals and the ratings of district superintendents. The distinction between “instruction” and “discipline” is purely arbitrary and artificial. To an impartial judge the founding of a rating scheme for the teaching force of a metropoli- tan school system upon such a traditional convention as this is ample evidence that the supervisory authorities have not assumed a scientific attitude of mind toward the compli- cated teaching process. ' The general conclusions as to the existing methods and standards for determining “fit and meritorious” service are that there is no method other than that of the personal idio- syncrasy of supervisors, and that there are no standards that bear intimate and v alid rela- tion to the quality of service rendered. The recommendations for the reorgan- ization of the supervisory staff were dis- cussed by Prof. Elliott in the May num- ber of THe AMERICAN TEACHER. 94 THE AMERICAN TEACHER CORRESPONDENCE MARRIAGE VERSUS TEACHING Editor, THE AMERICAN TEACHER: In your children ye shall make amends for being your father’s children. Thus ye shall redeem all that is past.—Friedrich Nietzsche. oe + '@ Shall a woman school teacher marry and remain in her position in the schools? The answer, as I see it, is a clear and unqualified ° ‘No!” And this flat-footed opposition comes not as a result of a belief that sexual life is something unholy and to be shunned, or that the schools are for the purpose of offering a means of livelihood to refined spinsters, or that girls make better teachers, or that motherhood impairs the teaching ability of women. Nay, it results rather from the deepest conviction of the writer that motherhood (and hence by im- plication marriage) is of such profound significance to the welfare of the race, car ries with it such weighty duties and re- sponsibilities is so fraught with infinite pos- sibilities and failures equally infinite, is of al! things earthly so nearest God that the pro- fession of motherhood is once and for all time incompatible with, and inevitably an- tagonistic to, every other profession—be it teaching, or music, or art, or money making. She who looks forward to the divine event of being a mother is separated from all the ordinary pursuits of humanity, from ail the hurly-burly of the workaday world. * * * * The absurdity of these well mean- ing folk who advocate a leave of absence for two months, or four or six or a year even, thinking thus to have made a step in advance, would be provocative of the laugh- ter of the gods were it not so tragically con- ducive to danger for the future of the race. What a woman thus circumstanced needs really, is a leave of absence for twenty-five years, and then some, to use a vulgar locution. * * * * How can any woman who dares to assume the name of mother think that she is entitled to all the privileges of motherhood if she considers her duties satisfactorily completed by staying away from her work for a short period before an:l after the birth of her child? And those who prate so glibly about the wealth of rich and new experiences, that flood the mother soul, as a result of the .close communion that exists between the mother and child, lose sight of the fact that nature never meant this most wonderful efflorescence of the human heart should be coined into dollars and cents, or sold at so much per month. * * * * A woman who truly desires to be a mother, whose heart yearns for the mir- acle of motherhood, who has prepared her- self in a most thoro manner physically spiritually for the great mission of bearing and nurturing a new life, will never for moment entertain the idea that she want teach, or paint, or sing, or write as soon as she physically can. And she will never marry a man who does not esteem it the greatest privilege of his life to provide ior her and her children in every way he and to the best of his power and strenvth A woman who marries a man less than tat cone whom she supports partly or whcoll proclaims by this act to have excluded her self from the sanctified group of mothers and therefore as such has no right to con- sider herself specially qualified as a teac ier Kov: IF, THEN, the public school must be charged, as I believe it must, with the ethical as well as the intellectual training of the vast majority of Amer- ican youth; and if it is admitted, as it must be, that the welfare of society and the preservation of republican insti- tutions depend in very large measure on the intellectual and ethical training given in the schools,—surely it follows that it is the business of the state to see to it that the teacher’s life is lived under such conditions that he can ren- der society his most efficient service — William H. Maxwell, in “The American Teacher—A Code of Ethics.” Address delivered at the University of Chicago, December 16, 1902. SOMETIMES in educational circles we hear the pessimist crying out, “We shall never have a chance to set things right until we can get rid of that tyrant off cial.” Then he seizes an easy opjx tunity to benefit the state by joi hands with some corrupt politician, never fails to add to the strength of his own “system” for every good turn does in improving some other “syste of the marks of the ineff- ciency of our present system of educa- It IS ONE tional management that the amici! transaction of necessary business for or several schools should be absolu'ely dependent on the state of one pers digestion. y ELEVATOR SERVICE PORCHES \ HOTEL FOR WOMEN With Hotel Restrictions Only Not operated by any religious or philantropic organization Rooms, with Board, $5.00 to $6.00 Weekly TELEPHONES LAUNDRY JUNIOR LEAGUE HOTEL 78th Street and East River TELEPHONE, LENOX 7730 \) ROOF GARDEN SEWING ROOM NEW YORK CITY —/ THE ELEMENTARY TEACHER Devoted to the im- provement of the eco- nomic conditions of the grade teachers of the United States. Organ of the National Grade Teachers Association Published monthly at Baltimore Fifty cents a year SPECIAL OFFER The American Teacher, 50 Cents COMBINATION RATES With Regular The American Price Teacher Educational Foundations $1.25 $1.25 Teachers Magazine . . $1:25 $1.25 School News. . . . $1.25 $1.25 The American Teacher 225 Fifth Avenue NEW YORK STATEMENT OF THE OWNERSHIP, \NAGEMENT, CIRCU LATION, etc., The American Teacher,” published onthly (except July and August) at New rk, N. Y., required by the Act of August ii, 1912. Name of Editor-in-Chief, Henry inville, Jamaica High School, Jamaica, : Managing Editor, Benj. C. Gruen- berz, Commercial High School, Brooklyn, N. \. Business Manager, J. Edward May- man, P. S. 84, Brooklyn, N. Y. Publishers, Benj. C. Gruenberg, Commercial High School, Brooklyn, N. Y.; Mark Hoffman, Stuyvesant High School, N. Y.; Henry R. Linville, Jamaica High School, Jamaica, N. Y.; Gabriel R. Mason, P. S. 62, Manhat- tan, N. Y.; J. Edward Mayman, P. S. 84, Brooklyn, N. Y. Owners—as above. Known bondholders, mortgagees, and other security holders, holding 1 per cent. or more of total amount of bonds, mortgages, or other securities: None. . J. E. Mayman, Business Manager. Sworn to and subscribed before me this 27th day of March, 1913. Louis P. Goldberg, Notary Public. Notary Public, Kings County. (My com- mission expires March 30, 1914.) (Seal) When answering advertisers, please mention THE AMERICAN TEACHER 96 THE AMERICAN TEACHER CO-OPERATION FOR HEALTH THE PERSON who refrains from spit- ting indiscriminately because he has learned that spitting serves to dissemin- ate germs of. tuberculosis and of other diseases, is not likely to profit much from his precautions. In this matter we must “all hang together or hang separately.” The same may be said, kowever, of nearly all applications of scientific discoveries to the protection of health: the problems are essentially community or group problems, rather than individual problems. For this reason the teacher, as the community’s agent in molding the thot of the com- munity of tomorrow, has concerns with health problems different from the concern of the printer or the manufac- turer. In the last analysis the teacher will be responsible for the character and the amount of co-operation for health that the children will practise when they grow up. In the call for the Fourth Interna- tional Congress on School Hygiene, to be held in Buffalo August 25 to 30, the need for the widest kind of co-opera- tion is recognized. Invitations are is- sued not merely to representatives of the schools and of the health offici ls, but to those interested in home prob- lems, in the administration of ci ies and towns, and in the governments of states. Adequate co-operation may be expected to yield returns not for the agents—which is the characteristic test of efficient commerciai enterprise; but for such abstractions as the foll ing: For the cuitp: Increased comfort, greater happiness, larger school room success, mor safety, and greater certainty of future ciency. lor the scHooLt: Fewer absences from school room, fewer interruptions on acc of epidemics, and more satisfactory ed tional response to class room activitie For the HOME: Less anxiety, less apprelien- sion, fewer doctor bills, less work, mor health, happiness, and prosperity. : For the TAXPAYER: A saving by more efficient methods in school work, “and also a larger product of active, intelligent, capable indi- viduals, whose influence will be toward the improvement of every phase of comm life. Kor the community: Healthier and, th fore, more efficient and more prosperou citizens. For the NATION: Results measured in terms of the conservation of human life. Situated on a elevation, where a m HichView. New York Sullivan County ||... : bathing close at Swimming po shower baths now construction. Blooring- burgh Station an office are within utes walk. s for j ai lets and rate are ob ained New York Address: 5 Beekman Street, Room 705. Telephone : from I. A. BENNEQUIT, Prop. 7645 Courtland or 4985 Gramercy Have you sent in your Subscription P : Buy your Books thru The American Teacher.